Daily rhythm of locomotor and reproductive activity in the annual fish Garcialebias reicherti (Cyprinodontiformes: Rivulidae)

Andres Olivera¹, Carlos Passos¹, Juan I. Vazquez^1,2, Bettina Tassino^1,3 and Adriana Migliaro^1,2,4

PDF: EN    XML: EN | Supplementary: S1 S2 | Cite this article

Abstract​

---

Introduction​

---

Living organisms exhibit physiological and behavioral daily rhythms stemming from the oscillations of endogenous circadian clocks. These clocks are in turn synchronized with environmental cycles or zeitgebers, among which the light/dark cycle is the most widespread (Aschoff, 1978; Aschoff et al., 1982; Foster, Helfrich-Forster, 2001; Ashton et al., 2022). Synchronization allows for better energy allocation, prediction of changes in the environment and coordination of social activities. In this sense fitness is potentiated by biological rhythms (Kumar, 1997; Paranjpe, Sharma, 2005; Dardente, Cermakian, 2007; Nikhil, Sharma, 2017) through the coordination of metabolic processes (an intrinsic adaptive value) and by synchronizing physiology and behavior with environmental cycles (an extrinsic adaptive value) (Sharma, 2003).

Locomotor activity is a standardized reference for assessing circadian rhythmicity throughout a wide variety of species, as a single output reflecting the coordination of physiological and behavioral states (Hurd et al., 1998; Beale et al., 2013; Cascallares et al., 2018; Starnes, Jones, 2023). In this sense animals are classified as nocturnal, diurnal or crepuscular according to the moment of the daily cycle (i.e., the phase of the light/dark cycle) in which the species concentrates the greatest percentage of daily movement (Herrero et al., 2003; Schulz, Leuchtenberger, 2006). However, this classification might be hijacked by individual variation within a single species (Helfman, 1986; Phillips et al., 2019) by variations associated to seasonal cycles (Tomotani et al., 2012), or because of ontogeny (Roennemberg et al., 2007; Krylov et al., 2021). Moreover, unpredictable environmental events can produce changes in established cycles (Prokkola, Nikinnma, 2018; Amichai, Kronfeld-Schor, 2019). Social interactions also influence daily activity patterns, highlighting the importance of contextual factors in behavioral analysis (Davidson, Menaker, 2003; Favreau et al., 2009; Migliaro et al., 2018; Gascue et al., 2020). Since survival depends on the successful occupation of spatial and temporal niches the presence of conspecifics might modulate their value (Larson et al., 2004; Eban-Rothschild, Bloch, 2012; Fuchikawa et al., 2016; Mildner, Roces, 2017). Moreover, group formation in teleosts modifies the pattern of nocturnal or diurnal habits (Kavaliers, 1980). Physiological and behavioral synchronization is crucial during the reproductive season influencing reproductive success (Rad et al., 2006). Social synchronization might change as animals undergo hormonal changes that might affect the circadian system, through the modulation of sensitivity to social stimuli (Lumineau et al., 1998; Campos-Mendoza et al., 2004).

Annual fish have the shortest life cycle of all vertebrates, one that is synchronized with the wax and wane of the freshwater ponds in which they live. Eggs hatch when ponds are full of clear water (mid-autumn, April-May) and as life progresses water turbidity increases as water level decreases until complete dry-out (summer, December-January) (Passos et al., 2021). As a result, natural photoperiod changes with the seasons, not only in length and phase, but also in amplitude. This raises interesting questions on the role of this typical zeitgeber on the synchronization of natural behavior. Pioneer studies on daily activity patterns of annual fish have been carried out in African species of the genus Nothobranchius Peters, 1868, reporting peaks of locomotor and reproductive activity close to midday (Haas, 1976; Lucas-Sanchez et al., 2011, 2013, 2015; ŽáK et al., 2019). Until now, no studies have been published on daily rhythms in South American annual fish, even though animals living under extreme environmental cycles make great models to study the synchronization of biological rhythms (Kronfeld-Schor et al., 2013; Migliaro et al., 2018; Castillo et al., 2023). Garcialebias reicherti previously known as Austrolebias reicherti (Loureiro & García, 2004) by Alonso et al., 2023 is endemic to the seasonal wetlands of eastern Uruguay (ca. 32°55’S 53°54’W). Adult fish engage in continuous reproduction from sexual maturity to death. They exhibit both behavioral and morphological dimorphism characterized by visual signals and locomotor displays that highlight the importance of visual information for the species (García et al., 2008; Passos et al., 2015). Males are larger than females with dark vertical bands on their body flanks, with unpaired fins and a strongly pigmented opercular region. Females are cryptic, light brown and not aggressive (Passos et al., 2015). Fertilization in this species is external and the courtship entails the display of locomotor patterns of attraction and response in both males and females, ending with the partial or total burial of the pair and the laying of eggs in the substrate (García et al., 2008; Passos et al., 2015). As the natural pond dry-out becomes imminent and stress levels increase, reproduction remains a highly motivated activity, despite the deterioration of environmental conditions (Passos et al., 2021). The importance of this social behavior demands precise synchronization in order to maximize the probability of occurrence of reproductive events. Moreover, since energy expenditure needs to be tightly controlled it is tempting to consider if there is a preferred moment of the day for reproduction. With an extremely changing environment that exposes animals to intense variation of environmental cycles and a peculiar life cycle which demands a high synchronization of social interactions, this species presents an unique opportunity to study the environmental and social synchronization of biological rhythms.

Material and methods

---

Collection and maintenance conditions. Adult individuals of Garcialebias reicherti, male (n = 10, standard length = 4.35 cm, weight = 1.97 g) and female (n = 10; standard length = 2.75 cm, weight = 1.0 g) were collected with a hand net from temporary ponds located in Treinta y Tres, Uruguay, 32°58’56.89”S 53°52’13.02”W, in October 2015 and August 2016 to evaluate activity patterns in isolation and reproductive context, respectively. Length and weight were in the range reported for the species. Voucher specimens were deposited in the Fish Collection of Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay (ZVC-P 15708). Fish were kept in an indoor facility 15 days prior to activity trials under constant temperature (19ºC) and natural photoperiod (natural light through ample windows). Males were kept in individual aquariums (20 x 9 x 15 cm, length x width x height) to avoid harmful agonistic interactions, while females were kept in communal aquariums (40 x 13 x 15 cm) in groups of five individuals. Water was replaced every three days in a third of its volume. During both maintenance and trials fish were fed Tubifex sp., following a randomized schedule to avoid synchronization (Blanco-Vives, Sánchez-Vázquez, 2009; Sánchez et al., 2009).

Experimental procedures. The experimental setup consisted of aquariums (45 x 15 x 15 cm) divided transversely by external markings into three zones of equal size. To reduce any external disturbance and provide an uniform background, white screens were placed covering the walls of the aquarium. For continuous recordings, four infrared cameras (Protecta, model PTC-CI20B-65) connected to a digital video recorder were arranged for a top view of the aquarium. Fish were acclimated for five days to the experimental conditions before the beginning of the recordings. After completing the trials, all fish were kept as breeding stock.

Locomotor activity in isolation. To evaluate locomotor activity in isolation, females (n = 5) and males (n = 5) were individually placed in experimental aquariums with constant temperature (19°C) and a 13L:11D (13 h light: 11 h dark) photoperiod (lights on at 6:00), adjusted to the natural photoperiod at the moment of the experiment. Locomotor activity was recorded for eight days. Light intensity in the water surface during the light phase was 200 lux (consistent with values recorded in the natural habitat).

Locomotor activity and reproductive events in a reproductive context. To evaluate locomotor activity in reproductive context, dyads (n = 5) composed of a male and a female fish were placed in experimental aquariums with constant temperature (19°C) and a 12L:12D photoperiod (lights on at 09:00 h), adjusted to the natural photoperiod at the moment of the experiment. Locomotor activity was recorded for four days. Light intensity in the water surface during the light phase was 200 lux. In order to evaluate reproductive activity, each experimental aquarium was equipped with a circular container (12 x 3 cm, diameter x height) containing borosilicate pellets (Thomas Scientific beads 0.5 mm) as spawning substratum. Containers were placed at the center of the aquarium.

Data processing and statistical analysis. Video recordings were visually inspected to determine the locomotor activity during six days. Locomotor activity was measured as the number of crossings through the reference marks on the aquarium during the first 10 min of each hour. We calculated the daytime activity (summed diurnal activity of the eight days), night time activity (summed nocturnal activity of the eight days) and total activity (total locomotor activity of the whole trial period). In reproductive context trials, the locomotor activity of each individual of the dyad was quantified separately. An estimation of the reproductive activity was assessed by the recording of mating burials in the spawning substratum (García et al., 2008) during the first 10 min of each hour for the whole day.

In order to assess rhythmicity we performed a standardized chronobiological analysis consisting of the fitting of cosine function with a 24 h period on a time series containing locomotor activity data for each individual (Cornelissen, 2014). The time of maximum amplitude of the fitted curve (locomotor activity), known as acrophase, is the individual parameter used for statistical validation of rhythmicity among different experimental groups. Rayleigh test for circular statistics was used for testing rhythmicity among individuals while also calculating the mean acrophase value for the group. Circular statistics analysis (cosinor and Rayleigh) was performed using “El Temps” (Díez-Noguera, ​​1999) and ad-hoc Python routines (Van Rossum, Drake, 2009). Actograms (representation of locomotor activity variation in the time domain) were plotted for individual and paired fish. Locomotor activity synchronization in dyads was assessed by the Pearson correlation function.

The amount of locomotor activity was compared between the light and dark phases, sexes, and contexts. Data was checked for normality using Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests. We used nonparametric test (i.e., Wilcoxon signed-rank and Mann-Whitney tests), as data did not follow normality. Unless otherwise stated, reported values are mean ± standard error. Statistical analyses were performed using PAST software version 2.16. Differences were considered significant when p < 0.05.

Results​

---

Daily rhythm of individual locomotor activity. Locomotor activity in isolated individuals is mainly diurnal, although a certain amount of nocturnal activity is present. The Fig. 1 shows the analysis of daily rhythmicity as resulting from the individual actograms and cosinor analysis (Fig. 1A), followed by the Rayleigh test for circular statistics (Fig. 1B, see Tab. 1 for statistical summary). Representative actograms and cosinor diagrams of male and female fish (8 days, LD) show that locomotor activity is diurnal regardless of sex (individual actograms are shown in Fig. S1). Anticipation of lights-on for the onset of movement can be seen right before artificial sunrise in each of the plotted days. The average acrophase of males was at 18:06 (n = 5, Rayleigh test, p = 0.008) while that of females was at 17:44 (n = 5, Rayleigh test, p = 0.008). No sexual differences in acrophases were detected (male, n = 5 vs. female, n = 5; Mann-Whitney U test; p = 0.84), and so we performed a global analysis of daily rhythmicity that included all isolated fish. Locomotor activity shows maximum values in the peri-sunset hours (sunset at 19:00), in the range from 15:30 to 21:00, with a population acrophase (mean acrophase) at 17:55 (n = 10, Rayleigh test, p = 2.7E-5). This acrophase synchronization in isolated individuals responds to the stable phase locking of individual rhythms with the light/dark cycle.

FIGURE 1| Daily rhythm of locomotor activity in isolated fish of Garcialebias reicherti recorded during eight days in LD. A. Representative actograms and cosinor fit diagrams for a female (orange) and a male (green) fish. Amount of locomotor activity (number of events) is normalized for visualization purposes. Gray areas in the actogram represent the dark phase of each 24 h period. The cosinor representation for each individual is shown below the actogram. Black outlines represent the duration of the night. The internal circumference depicts the p = 0.05 confidence limit. Radial lines show the extreme values of the acrophases calculated for each of six days. B. Rayleigh test for all isolated individuals (5 males and 5 females) analyzed collectively. Triangles signal individual acrophases. The internal circumference depicts the p = 0.05 confidence limit and length of the black radial line marks the p value (external circumference is p = 0, see main text for p value). The black outline represents the duration of the night.

TABLE 1 | Locomotor activity of Garcialebias reicherti in relation to sex (males vs. females), social context (isolated, i vs. reproductive, r) and light/dark cycle phase (day vs. night). Values are shown as mean ± standard dev. (range between parentheses). P values of the respective Mann-Whitney U test are shown, and statistical significance is marked with an asterisk. Male (i) = isolated males; Female (i) = isolated females; Male (r) = males in reproductive context; Female (r) = females in reproductive context. Comparisons: All (i) = comparison among all isolated fish for each phase (day or night); All (r) = comparison among all reproductive fish for each phase (day or night).

	Male (i)	Female (i)	p	Male (r)	Female (r)	p	All (i)	All (r)	p
			Male (i) vs. female (i)			Male (r) vs. female (r)			Isolated vs. reproductive
Day	829.4±356.6 (496-1412)	714.2±334.4 (395-1246)	0.530	534.6±268.9 (309-992)	401.2±245.9 (206-826)	0.146	728.5±331.5 (395-1412)	393±252.9 (206-992)	0.022*
Night	320.4±76.7 (197-395)	515.4±336.2 (124-993)	0.532	263.2±44.1 (214-319)	213.6±132.1 (88-376)	0.680	353.5±251.8 (124-993)	244.5±96.4 (88-376)	0.053*
p	0.043*	0.043*		0.043*	0.043*		0.005*	0.005*

Daily rhythm of locomotor activity in reproductive context. In order to assess differences in locomotor activity induced by the reproductive context, female-male pairs housed in the same tank were recorded during four days. The Fig. 2 shows the analysis of the daily rhythms recorded in this condition. Superimposed actograms of two representative pairs in LD regime, and their respective individual cosinor diagrams, show that locomotor activity is allocated mainly during the day for both individuals of the pair (Fig. 2A, actograms for every pair are shown in Fig. S2). A global analysis of the locomotor activity of all reproductive individuals was performed using the Rayleigh test (Fig. 2B). Individual acrophases are close to sunset (19:00), and 8 out of 10 individual acrophases fall in a 3 h range from 18:00 to 21:00. The mean population acrophase occurs at 18:39 (n = 10, Rayleigh test, p = 1.30E-04). As in isolated fish, no sexual differences were detected in this analysis (male, n = 5 vs. female, n = 5; Mann-Whitney U test; p = 0.42). Furthermore, reproductive context had no effect on individual acrophases (Isolated, n = 10 vs. Reproductive, n = 10, Mann-Whitney U test; p = 0.28).

FIGURE 2| Daily rhythm of locomotor activity in paired fish of Garcialebias reicherti recorded during four days in LD. A. Representative time series (actograms) and cosinor fit diagrams for two female (orange) and a male (green) dyads. Amount of locomotor activity (number of events) is normalized for visualization purposes. Gray areas in the actogram represent the dark phase of each 24 h period. The cosinor representation for each individual of the dyad is shown next to the actogram. Black outlines represent the duration of the night. The internal circumference depicts the p = 0.05 confidence limit. Radial lines show the extreme values of the acrophases calculated for each of six days. B. Rayleigh test for all paired individuals (5 males and 5 females) analyzed collectively. Triangles signal individual male acrophases, diamonds signal individual female acrophases. Members of each dyad are presented in the same color. The internal circumference depicts the p = 0.05 confidence limit and length of the black radial line marks the p value (external circumference is p = 0, see main text for p value). The black outline represents the duration of the night.

Locomotor activity in individuals of the same pair seems to be relatively synchronized, both in terms of the daily phase of the locomotor rhythm as well as in terms of the initiation of movement throughout the whole period of recording. The former is evident in the proximity of the acrophases among the two members of the pair, since in four out of five pairs, the difference between the individual acrophases was less than 30 min (Fig. 2B, members of the same pair presented in the same color). As for the latter, the coordination of locomotor events among the members of the couple was measured by cross-correlation analysis of the respective time series. The Tab. 1 shows Pearson’s correlation values for the two individuals of the pair.

Influence of reproductive context on locomotor activity. Quantification and statistical analysis of locomotor activity according to sex, photoperiod phase (day vs. night) and reproductive context is presented in Tab. 2. Locomotor activity is higher during the day, regardless of sex and social context. Moreover, within each social context males and females show similar amounts of locomotor activity throughout the 24 h cycle. Although reproductive context had no effect on the rhythmicity of locomotor activity, it did have a modulatory effect on its magnitude (Fig. 3). A comparison between isolated and paired fish shows that the reproductive context induces a 40% decrease in the amount of locomotor activity (Isolated, n = 10 vs. Reproductive, n = 10, Mann-Whitney U test, p = 0.023).

TABLE 2 | Correlation indexes (r) of locomotor activities among the individuals of each dyad of Garcialebias reicherti. Asterisks signal statistical significance for each r value (* = p<0.001).

Dyad	r
1	0.7*
2	0.56*
3	0.49*
4	0.37*
5	0.47*

FIGURE 3| Contextual modulation of locomotor activity of Garcialebias reicherti. Total daily locomotor activity for isolated (n = 10) and paired fish (n = 10). Each dot represents the mean number of events for each fish. *shows statistical significance (see p value in the main text). Box height from upper to lower quartile, whiskers represent standard deviation, median shown by horizontal line.

Timming of reproductive events. Of the five couples analyzed, four showed reproductive activity. Reproductive events are conspicuous and have been extensively described previously. Event occurrence throughout the day was analyzed and is presented in Fig. 4. Reproductive activity is strictly diurnal covering a range from 9:00 to 19:00 with more than 70% of the events occurring before midday.

FIGURE 4| Number and allocation of reproductive events at different hours in Garcialebias reicherti. Bars show the occurrence of events at different timepoints for each dyad (see references). Concentric circumferences show the number of events at that hour throughout the 4-day period. Black outline signals the duration of the night.

Discussion​

---

In this work we show that Garcialebias reicherti is a diurnal species, as evidenced by the synchronization of the daily pattern of locomotor and reproductive activity with the light phase of the photoperiod. Moreover, we present evidence that a reproductive context modulates the pattern of diurnal locomotor activity promoting a decrease in total activity and the synchronization among the individuals of the pair.

Locomotor activity. Locomotor activity is higher during the light phase of the day. This holds true for both isolated and reproductive animals. Similar results have been reported for African annual fish of the genus Nothobranchius (Haas, 1976; Lucas-Sánchez et al., 2011, 2015). However, while Nothobranchius have acrophases close to midday, G. reicherti maximum locomotor activity is allocated closer to sunset. It is worth noticing that in the reports for Nothobranchius fish were routinely fed at a fixed time (midday). Feeding regimen is a potent zeitgeber which could be entraining locomotor activity and hence influencing acrophases (Mistlberger, 1993; Singh et al., 2016). Since the mean population acrophase is close to sunset it could be interesting to consider whether locomotor activity is diurnal or crepuscular. The term crepuscular refers to activity with maximum expression coinciding with twilight, the peri-sunrise and peri-sunset period characterized by an extremely dim light which occurs when the sun is between zero degrees (sunrise/sunset) and 18° below the horizon (Potts, 1990). Our experimental laboratory protocol, with lights on at 6:00 and off at 19:00 does not include a twilight period. In this sense we can not conclude that this rhythm is crepuscular. Instead, we conclude they are diurnal, since the mean population acrophase is diurnal (17:55). Locomotor activity recordings in the natural habitat (when animals are actually exposed to twilight) would be necessary and extremely interesting, to determine crepuscularity

The proportion of activity occurring during the day and the acrophase of locomotor rhythms are similar in both isolated and reproductive animals, showing a robust diurnal behavior. This diurnality is particularly advantageous for annual fish, as they possess strong visual acuity supported by the anatomical development of their visual system as well as extensive neural proliferation associated with visual structures (Casanova et al., 2015; Berrosteguieta et al., 2022). These characteristics suggest their reliance on visual information for various behavioral displays, such as the intensification of body pigmentation associated with courtship and hierarchical position (Passos et al., 2013), as well as locomotor displays and fin placement linked to courtship and aggression. Additionally, sympatric species differ exclusively in male pigmentation, indicating that visual information plays a critical role in species recognition and reproductive isolation (García et al., 2008; Passos et al., 2016). Mechanosensory and chemical information are also relevant and most likely participating in perception. For instance, in a hybridization context, females tell apart conspecific mates from heterospecific mates based upon chemical cues (Reyes-Blengini et al., 2018). The advantage of diurnality becomes particularly evident, especially at the beginning of the reproductive season when water is clear (Passos et al., 2021). The visual clarity provided by daylight facilitates the effective use of visual information for species recognition, courtship, and other social interactions. This opens an interesting question regarding changes in relative amounts of diurnal vs. nocturnal locomotor activity associated with changes in water turbidity, as a proxy of seasonal changes.

The impact of the reproductive context. Social reproductive context promotes two clear modulations on activity patterns: i) a decrease in the total amount of locomotor activity and ii) the synchronization of locomotor events among individuals sharing the same tank. Isolation of gregarious animals promotes stress as evidenced by the physiological and behavioral changes reported in mammals (Donovan et al., 2020, 2022), birds (Apfelbeck, Raess, 2008) and fish (Tunback, 2020). Stress is commonly associated with cortisol release, which has been linked to elevated levels of locomotor activity (Øverli et al., 2002). Moreover, a peak in blood cortisol concentration anticipates or coincides with the onset of daily activity in mammals (Mohawk, Lee, 2005; Passos et al., 2021) and other animal groups including fish (Oliveira et al., 2013). Increases in locomotor activity in isolated animals as different as birds or fruit-flies, have been previously reported (Apfelbeck, Raess, 2008; Lone, Sharma, 2011; Tunbak et al., 2020) and linked to stress induced by social deprivation (Mumtaz et al., 2018). In G. reicherti, reproductive behavior and stress are linked, as increased cortisol levels resulting from environmental stressors actually promote reproduction (Passos et al., 2021). Therefore, isolated animals, with elevated cortisol levels induced by stress, might be actively exploring the environment, driven by the necessity to reproduce. Although not gregarious, G. reicherti inhabits densely populated ponds and, throughout its short life cycle individuals engage in intense reproductive activity from sexual maturation until death (García et al., 2008). Males are territorial and frequently engage in aggressive encounters in defense of oviposition sites. Isolation is a very rare condition for the species (Passos, 2013). When animals are housed in male-female pairs, the need for extensive exploration to find a mate for reproduction is minimized. Furthermore, our results suggest a strong correlation between locomotor events in the two individuals of a pair. Actograms presented in Fig. 2 show superposition of locomotor events between the paired fish, particularly during periods of intense activity. This is further supported by the high correlation indexes for the time series containing locomotor activity data of both members of a pair. This coordination is also confirmed by cosinor and Rayleigh analysis, showing that even though the individual acrophases span a range of three hours, the difference between acrophases of the two members of a pair does not exceed 30 min.

Reproductive behavior. Garcialebias reicherti has a single reproductive season extending from sexual maturity to death. Our results show that reproductive events occurred mainly during the first four hours of the day, similarly to what has been reported for African annual fish (Vrtílek, Reichard, 2016). The fact that reproductive events occur during the day is indicative of the importance of visual communication for reproductive behavior in relation to morphological characters and behavioral displays.

Social context is emerging as a significant modulator of rhythmic behavior in the field of chronobiology, even rivaling the influence of light/dark cycle (Tomotani et al., 2016; Migliaro et al., 2018; Gascue et al., 2020; Siehler et al., 2021). We show here that pair housing does not modify the acrophase for locomotor activity, which is associated with the last hours of the day for both isolated and socially housed individuals. However, behavior displayed in reproductive context brings to light the modulatory effect of this particular social context on the rhythm of locomotor behavior. The daily rhythm of reproductive events evidences the coexistence of two rhythmic processes, a reproductive rhythmic behavior occurring in the morning, and the daily variation of locomotor activity which has maximum values towards the evening. These rhythms must coexist in a coordinated expression in nature, while keeping a synchronization with environmental variables. Contextual information, especially socially relevant settings appear to play a fundamental role in the fine tuning of circadian rhythms, particularly in the expression of adaptive social behavior (Davison, Menaker, 2003; Favreu et al., 2009; Bloch, 2010).

Acknowledgments​

---

We thank Grupo Cronobiología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República Uruguay (CSIC-Udelar) for financial support (CSIC I+D 2016, CSIC Grupos Cronobiología).

References​

---

Alonso F, Terán GE, Serra Alanís WS, Calviño P, Montes MM, García ID et al. From the mud to the tree: phylogeny of Austrolebias killifishes, new generic structure and description of a new species (Cyprinodontiformes: Rivulidae). Zool J Linn Soc. 2023; 199(1):280–309. https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlad032

Amichai E, Kronfeld-Schor N. Artificial light at night promotes activity throughout the night in nesting common swifts (Apus apus). Sci Rep. 2019; 9:11052. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47544-3

Apfelbeck B, Raess M. Behavioural and hormonal effects of social isolation and neophobia in a gregarious bird species, the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris). Horm Behav. 2008; 54(3):435–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2008.04.003

Aschoff J, Pohl H. Phase relations between a circadian rhythm and its zeitgeber within the range of entrainment. Naturwissenschaften. 1978; 65(2):80–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00440545

Aschoff JC, Daan S, Groos GA, editors. Vertebrate circadian systems: structure and physiology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin & Heidelberg, New York; 1982.

Ashton A, Foster RG, Jagannath A. Photic entrainment of the circadian system. Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(2):729. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23020729

Beale A, Guibal C, Tamai TK, Klotz L, Cowen S, Peyric E et al. Circadian rhythms in Mexican blind cavefish Astyanax mexicanus in the lab and in the field. Nat Commun. 2013; 4:2769. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3769

Berrosteguieta I, Rosillo JC, Herrera ML, Olivera-Bravo S, Casanova G, Herranz-Pérez V et al. Plasticity of cell proliferation in the retina of Austrolebias charrua fish under light and darkness conditions. Curr Res Neurobiol. 2022; 3:100042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crneur.2022.100042

Blanco-Vives B, Sánchez-Vázquez FJ. Synchronisation to light and feeding time of circadian rhythms of spawning and locomotor activity in zebrafish. Physiol Behav. 2009; 98(3):268–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2009.05.015

Bloch G. The social clock of the honeybee. J Biol Rhythms. 2010; 25(5):307–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748730410380149

Campos-Mendoza A, McAndrew BJ, Coward K, Bromage N. Reproductive response of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) to photoperiodic manipulation; effects on spawning periodicity, fecundity and egg size. Aquaculture. 2004; 231(1):299–314. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2003.10.023

Casanova G, Olivera-Bravo S, Fernández A. Comparative anatomy and proliferative zones of adult Austrolebias brain. In: Berois N, Garcia G, Sa RO, editors. Annual Fishes – Life history strategy, biodiversity, and evolution. CRC Press Boca Raton, USA; 2015. p.231–50. https://doi.org/10.1201/b19016-17

Cascallares G, Riva S, Franco DL, Risau-Gusman S, Gleiser PM. Role of the circadian clock in the statistics of locomotor activity in Drosophila. PLoS ONE. 2018; 13(8):e0202505. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202505

Castillo J, Tonon AC, Hidalgo MP, Silva A, Tassino B. Individual light history matters to deal with the Antarctic summer. Sci Rep. 2023; 13:12081. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-39315-y

Cornelissen G. Cosinor-based rhythmometry. Theor Biol Med Model. 2014; 11:16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4682-11-16

Dardente H, Cermakian N. Molecular circadian rhythms in central and peripheral clocks in mammals. Chronobiol Int. 2007; 24(2):195–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/07420520701283693

Davidson AJ, Menaker M. Birds of a feather clock together – sometimes: Social synchronization of circadian rhythms. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2003; 13(6):765–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2003.10.011

Díez-Noguera A. El Temps, software. Version 1. 1999. Available from: http://www.el-temps.com/principal.html

Donovan ML, Chun EK, Liu Y, Wang Z. Post-weaning Social Isolation in Male and Female Prairie Voles: Impacts on Central and Peripheral Immune System. Front Behav Neurosci. 2022; 15:1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2021.802569

Donovan M, Mackey CS, Platt GN, Rounds J, Brown AN, Trickey DJ et al. Social isolation alters behavior, the gut-immune-brain axis, and neurochemical circuits in male and female prairie voles. Neurobiol Stress. 2020; 13:100278. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ynstr.2020.100278

Eban-Rothschild A, Bloch G. Social influences on circadian rhythms and sleep in insects. Adv Genet. 2012; 77:1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387687-4.00001-5

Favreau A, Richard-Yris M-A, Bertin A, Houdelier C, Lumineau S. Social influences on circadian behavioural rhythms in vertebrates. Anim Behav. 2009; 77(5):983–89. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.01.004

Foster RG, Helfrich-Forster C. The regulation of circadian clocks by light in fruitflies and mice. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2001; 356(1415):1779–89. https://doi.org/10.1098%2Frstb.2001.0962

Fuchikawa T, Eban-Rothschild A, Nagari M, Shemesh Y, Bloch G. Potent social synchronization can override photic entrainment of circadian rhythms. Nat Commun. 2016; 7:11662. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11662

García D, Loureiro M, Tassino B. Reproductive behavior in the annual fish Austrolebias reicherti Loureiro & García, 2004 (Cyprinodontiformes: Rivulidae). Neotrop Ichthyol. 2008; 6(2):243–48. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-62252008000200012

Gascue V, Silva AC, Migliaro A. Social modulation on daily variability in electric behavior. Sleep Science. 2020; 13(suppl. 2):41–46.

Haas R. Behavioral biology of the annual killifish, Nothobranchius guentheri. Copeia. 1976; 1976(1):80–91. https://doi.org/10.2307/1443776

Helfman GS. Fish behaviour by day, night and twilight. In: Pitcher TJ, editor. The behaviour of Teleost fishes. Boston, MA: Springer US; 1986. p.366–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8261-4_14

Herrero MJ, Madrid JA, Sánchez-Vázquez FJ. Entrainment to light of circadian activity rhythms in tench (Tinca tinca). Chronobiol Int. 2003; 20(6):1001–17. https://doi.org/10.1081/CBI-120025246

Hurd MW, Debruyne J, Straume M, Cahill GM. Circadian rhythms of locomotor activity in zebrafish. Physiol Behav. 1998; 65(3):465–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9384(98)00183-8

Kavaliers M. Circadian activity of the white sucker, Catostomus commersoni: comparison of individual and shoaling fish. Can J Zool. 1980; 58(8):1399–403. https://doi.org/10.1139/z80-192

Kronfeld-Schor N, Bloch G, Schwartz WJ. Animal clocks: when science meets nature. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2013; 280(1765):20131354. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.1354

Krylov VV, Izvekov EI, Pavlova VV, Pankova NA, Osipova EA. Circadian rhythms in zebrafish (Danio rerio) behaviour and the sources of their variability. Biol Rev. 2021; 96(3):785–97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12678

Kumar V. Photoperiodism in higher vertebrates: an adaptive strategy in temporal environment. Indian J Exp Biol. 1997; 35(5):427–37.

Larson ET, Winberg S, Mayer I, Lepage O, Summers CH, Øverli Ø. Social stress affects circulating melatonin levels in rainbow trout. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2004; 136(3):322–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2004.01.005

Lone SR, Sharma VK. Circadian consequence of socio-sexual interactions in fruit flies Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS ONE. 2011; 6(12):e28336. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028336

Lucas-Sánchez A, Almaida-Pagán PF, Madrid JA, Costa J, Mendiola P. Age-related changes in fatty acid profile and locomotor activity rhythms in Nothobranchius korthausae. Exp Gerontol. 2011; 46(12):970–78. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2011.08.009

Lucas-Sánchez A, Almaida-Pagán PF, Martinez-Nicolas A, Madrid JA, Mendiola P, Costa J. Rest-activity circadian rhythms in aged Nothobranchius korthausae. The effects of melatonin. Exp Gerontol. 2013; 48(5):507–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2013.02.026

Lucas-Sánchez A, Martínez-Nicolás A, Madrid JA, Almaida-Pagán PF, Mendiola P, Costa J. Circadian activity rhythms during the last days of Nothobranchius rachovii life: A descriptive model of circadian system breakdown. Chronobiol Int. 2015; 32(3):395–404. https://doi.org/10.3109/07420528.2014.984040

Lumineau S, Guyomarc’h C, Boswell T, Richard J-P, Leray D. Induction of circadian rhythm of feeding activity by testosterone implantations in arrhythmic Japanese quail males. J Biol Rhythms. 1998; 13(4):278–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/074873098129000110

Migliaro A, Moreno V, Marchal P, Silva A. Daily changes in the electric behavior of weakly electric fish naturally persist in constant darkness and are socially synchronized. Biol Open. 2018; 7(12):bio036319. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.036319

Mildner S, Roces F. Plasticity of daily behavioral rhythms in foragers and nurses of the ant Camponotus rufipes: Influence of social context and feeding times. PLoS ONE. 2017; 12(1):e0169244. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169244

Mistlberger RE. Effects of scheduled food and water access on circadian rhythms of hamsters in constant light, dark, and light:dark. Physiol Behav. 1993; 53(3):509–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(93)90145-6

Mohawk JA, Lee TM. Restraint stress delays reentrainment in male and female diurnal and nocturnal rodents. J Biol Rhythms. 2005; 20(3):245–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748730405276323

Mumtaz F, Khan MI, Zubair M, Dehpour AR. Neurobiology and consequences of social isolation stress in animal model-A comprehensive review. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018; 105:1205–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2018.05.086

Nikhil KL, Sharma VK. On the origin and implications of circadian timekeeping: An evolutionary perspective. In: Kumar V, editor. Biological timekeeping: Clocks, rhythms and behaviour. New Delhi, Springer; 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3688-7_5

Oliveira CCV, Aparício R, Blanco-Vives B, Chereguini O, Martín I, Javier Sánchez-Vazquez F. Endocrine (plasma cortisol and glucose) and behavioral (locomotor and self-feeding activity) circadian rhythms in Senegalese sole (Solea senegalensis Kaup 1858) exposed to light/dark cycles or constant light. Fish Physiol Biochem. 2013; 39(3):479–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10695-012-9713-2

Øverli Ø, Kotzian S, Winberg S. Effects of cortisol on aggression and locomotor activity in rainbow trout. Horm Behav. 2002; 42(1):53–61. https://doi.org/10.1006/hbeh.2002.1796

Paranjpe DA, Sharma VK. Evolution of temporal order in living organisms. J Circadian Rhythms. 2005; 3(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1740-3391-3-7

Passos C. Austrolebias: un modelo para explorar la selección sexual. [PhD Thesis]. Montevideo: Universidad de la República Uruguay; 2013. Available from: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12008/37744

Passos C, Reyes F, Jalabert C, Quintana L, Tassino B, Silva A. Stress promotes reproduction in the annual fish Austrolebias reicherti. Anim Behav. 2021; 174:105–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2021.02.003

Passos C, Reyes F, Tassino B, Rosenthal GG, González A. Female annual killifish Austrolebias reicherti (Cyprinodontiformes, Rivulidae) attend to male chemical cues. Ethology. 2013; 119(10):891–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12129

Passos C, Tassino B, Rosenthal GG, Reichard M. Reproductive behavior and sexual selection in annual fishes. In: Berois N, Garcia G, Sa RO, editors. Annual Fishes – Life history strategy, biodiversity, and evolution. CRC Press Boca Raton, USA; 2015. p.207–30.

Phillips AJK, Vidafar P, Burns AC, McGlashan EM, Anderson C, Rajaratnam SMW et al. High sensitivity and interindividual variability in the response of the human circadian system to evening light. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2019; 116(24):12019–24. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1901824116

Potts GW. Crepuscular behaviour of marine fishes. In: Herring PJ, Campbell AK, Whitfield M, Maddock L, editors. Light and life in the sea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990. p.221–27.

Prokkola JM, Nikinmaa M. Circadian rhythms and environmental disturbances – underexplored interactions. J Exp Biol. 2018; 221(16):jeb179267. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.179267

Rad F, Bozaoğlu S, Ergene Gözükara S, Karahan A, Kurt G. Effects of different long-day photoperiods on somatic growth and gonadal development in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus L.). Aquaculture. 2006; 255(1):292–300. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.11.028

Reyes-Blengini F, Tassino B, Passos C. Females of the annual killifish Austrolebias reicherti (Cyprinodontiformes: Rivulidae) recognize conspecific mates based upon chemical cues. Behav Processes. 2018; 155:33–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2017.08.007

Sánchez JA, López-Olmeda JF, Blanco-Vives B, Sánchez-Vázquez FJ. Effects of feeding schedule on locomotor activity rhythms and stress response in sea bream. Physiol Behav. 2009; 98(1–2):125–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2009.04.020

Schulz UH, Leuchtenberger C. Activity patterns of South American silver catfish (Rhamdia quelen). Braz J Biol. 2006; 66(2A):565–74. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1519-69842006000300024

Sharma VK. Adaptive significance of circadian clocks. Chronobiol Int. 2003; 20(6):901–19. https://doi.org/10.1081/cbi-120026099

Siehler O, Wang S, Bloch G. Social synchronization of circadian rhythms with a focus on honeybees. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2021; 376(1835). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0342

Singh D, Trivedi N, Malik S, Rani S, Kumar V. Timed food availability affects circadian behavior but not the neuropeptide Y expression in Indian weaverbirds exposed to atypical light environment. Physiol Behav. 2016; 161:81–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.04.017

Starnes AN, Jones JR. Inputs and outputs of the mammalian circadian clock. Biology. 2023; 12(4):508. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12040508

Tomotani BM, Amaya JP, Oda GA, Valentinuzzi VS. Social modulation of the daily activity rhythm in a solitary subterranean rodent, the tuco-tuco (Ctenomys sp). Sleep Sci. 2016; 9(4):280–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.slsci.2016.06.001

Tomotani BM, Flores DEFL, Tachinardi P, Paliza JD, Oda GA, Valentinuzzi VS. Field and laboratory studies provide insights into the meaning of day-time activity in a subterranean rodent (Ctenomys aff. knighti), the tuco-tuco. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7(5):e37918. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037918

Tunbak H, Vazquez-Prada M, Ryan TM, Kampff AR, Dreosti E. Whole-brain mapping of socially isolated zebrafish reveals that lonely fish are not loners. Elife. 2020; 9:e55863. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.55863

Van Rossum G, Drake FL. Python 3 Reference Manual, Scotts Valley, CA: CreateSpace; 2009.

Vrtílek M, Reichard M. Female fecundity traits in wild populations of African annual fish: the role of the aridity gradient. Ecol Evol. 2016; 6(16):5921–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2337

ŽáK J, Vrtílek M, Reichard M. Diel schedules of locomotor, reproductive and feeding activity in wild populations of African annual killifish. Biol J Linn Soc. 2019; 128(2):435–50. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/blz108

Authors

---

Andres Olivera¹, Carlos Passos¹, Juan I. Vazquez^1,2, Bettina Tassino^1,3 and Adriana Migliaro^1,2,4

^[1]    Grupo Cronobiología, CSIC, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República Uruguay. Iguá, 4225, 11400 Montevideo, Uruguay. (AO) aolivera@fcien.edu.uy, (CP) 57naranja@gmail.com.

^[2]    Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas Clemente Estable, Departamento de Neurofisiología Celular y Molecular, IIBCE-MEC. Av. Italia 3318, 11600 Montevideo, Uruguay. (JIV) jvazquez1066@gmail.com.

^[3]    Sección Etología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República Uruguay. Iguá, 4225, 11400 Montevideo, Uruguay. (BT) tassino@fcien.edu.uy.

^[4]    Laboratorio de Neurociencias, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República Uruguay. Iguá, 4225, 11400 Montevideo, Uruguay. (AM) amigliaro@fcien.edu.uy (corresponding author).

Authors’ Contribution

---

Andres Olivera: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing-original draft.

Carlos Passos: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Writing-original draft.

Juan I. Vazquez: Formal analysis, Visualization, Writing-review and editing.

Bettina Tassino: Funding acquisition, Project administration, Validation, Writing-original draft.

Adriana Migliaro: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing-original draft, Writing-review and editing.

Ethical Statement​

---

Collection and experimental procedures were approved by the ethical committee of Universidad de la República, Uruguay (240011-000511-17-CEUA-Udelar).

Competing Interests

---

The author declares no competing interests.

How to cite this article

---

Olivera A, Passos C, Vazquez JI, Tassino B, Migliaro A. Daily rhythm of locomotor and reproductive activity in the annual fish Garcialebias reicherti (Cyprinodontiformes: Rivulidae). Neotrop Ichthyol. 2024; 22(1):e230100. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0224-2023-0100

Copyright​

---

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Distributed under

Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0

© 2024 The Authors.

Diversity and Distributions Published by SBI

Accepted November 16, 2023 by Eliane Gonçalves de Freitas

Submitted August 30, 2023

Epub February 19, 2024