Knowledge of natural history plays a key role in the protection and conservation of species (Dayton, 2003; Bury, 2006; Tewksbury et al., 2014). The intrinsic relationships of the animals within their natural habitats are useful to determine demography, nature, and geography of genetic and phenotypic variations, interactions with the environment and other species, priority areas for conservation, and enhancement of the cultural value of animals to human welfare (Greene, Losos, 1988). Although natural history studies date to the 18th century (Arnold, 2003), the high diversity of organisms worldwide remains a difficult challenge especially when considering diverse tropical freshwater ecosystems. Although these habitats represent 0.01% of the world’s surface, they harbor one-third of all living vertebrate species, most of it composed of Neotropical fishes (Balian et al., 2007).
Overall, instream fish populations are not randomly distributed, and dimensional stratifications are expected due to differences in species morphology, behavior or natural history. Moreover, the alteration or elimination of riparian forest cover is known as a main driver of habitat homogenization (Pusey, Arthington, 2003), and consequently the depauperating and homogenization of fish communities (Casatti et al., 2012; Dala-Corte et al., 2020). Hence, the knowledge of how fish communities are naturally distributed can help predict the impact and consequent loss of diversity according to the habitat alteration, as well as highlighting which species are more vulnerable to the impacts of the riparian vegetation loss. This approach is especially effective for small-bodied species, because body size is positively correlated to a high potential for species extinction (Ripple et al., 2017). An order-of-magnitude decrease of body mass in small bony fish species can increase up to 148% the odds of being threatened, considering worldwide vertebrates (Ripple et al., 2017). Nonetheless, smaller species tend to have restricted distribution ranges which, in turn, is a proxy for the risk of extinction due to habitat loss (Nogueira et al., 2010). At the population level, chronically disturbed populations tend to have increased average body size due to the decrease or total exclusion of recruitment, especially by the loss of spawning habitats, and the predominance of persistent older individuals (Murphy et al., 2013). In the Neotropics approximately 70% of the more than 4,000 species are under 15cm of standard length (Reis et al., 2003; Castro, Polaz, 2020). Because of their small size, direct observations of the horizontal stratification are needed for reliable data about the species dwelling at shallow marginal areas that directly depend on the allochthonous items from the riparian forest for food and shelter (Angermeier, Karr, 1983).
Fish species have a wide range of morphological diversity that results in a wide range of habitat use and food acquisition tactics (Matthews, 1998). A usual tool to determine trophic positions consists of classifying the species based on simplifying and synthesizing dietary information to define trophic guilds. Root (1967) defined the guild as ‘a group of species that exploit the same class of environmental resources in a similar way’. In this way, the clustering of species within guilds summarizes similarities, determining which species share the use of common resources regardless of their taxonomic identity. Functional relationships are the basis for the comparisons among communities (Simberloff, Dayan, 1991). Trophic guilds are useful in describing the functional roles of species within ecosystems (Franco et al., 2008), as well as in identifying the species most likely to compete for food resources (Specziár, Rezsu, 2009), simplifying complex food webs (Garrison, Link, 2000), and facilitating comparison across ecosystems (Elliott et al., 2007). Just as trophic guilds are useful for understanding which resources are consumed, the functional trophic group (FTG) aims to identify how the resources are obtained by the animals (Brejão et al., 2013). Species classification in FTGs summarizes behavioural relationships and food acquisition that sheds light on the natural history traits represented in the community (Uieda, 1984; Sazima, 1986; Sabino, Castro, 1990; Sabino, Zuanon, 1998; Casatti et al., 2001; Brejão et al., 2013). In this sense, naturalistic observations are easily applied in streams where water transparency is favorable in most of the year, like in clear-water karst streams.
Our study sites in central-western Brazil are in one of the most extensive continuous karst areas in Brazil, the Serra da Bodoquena. It consists of a north-south oriented plateau of about 200 km length whose waters drains into the Pantanal floodplain, making this region one of the most unique headwaters in the Upper Paraguay River basin (UPRB). Moreover, this region has numerous species of fishes with endemic or restricted ranges, such as Hypostomus basilisko, H. froehlichi, H. perdido and Oligosarcus perdido, which points out this region as a hotspot for conservation in the UPRB. Although the region is internationally known as a tourist destination due to its clear crystalline waters, the ecology of fishes that inhabit the streams (e.g., trophic, morphological and distributional attributes) is poorly known. Nonetheless, the rapid conversion in the last decade from livestock grazing pastures to monocultures, especially soybean production, caused significant environmental damage to the streams, such as siltation and the increase in the water turbidity after rainfalls (Chiaravalotti et al., 2022). The threat of increased turbidity and associated impacts of land conversion affect the region not only from the economic perspective but also as an unprecedent factor on the population dynamic of native fish.
As a contribution to the understanding of functional and trophic aspects of fishes from streams in the Bodoquena plateau, this study defines and characterizes the functional trophic structure of the stream ichthyofauna in the southern Brazilian portion of Upper Paraguay River basin. Through direct observations, our main goal was to define the spatial distribution of the fish species in their natural habitats, as well as their microhabitat use and the intra and inter-specific relationships. Also, we provide a comprehensive compilation of studies of functional trophic groups to discuss how conservative and consistent the classifications are among different biogeographical domains and taxonomical levels. FTGs are important tools to describe the foraging habits of stream fishes because they allow the comparison among different communities with distinct evolutionary histories and can provide evidence for the phylogenetic niche conservatism hypothesis. According to this hypothesis, phylogenetically related species tend to retain similar ecological niches over evolutionary time (Losos, 2008). Hence, due to the biological constraints shared among phylogenetically related species, we expect to find a consistent pattern between the FTGs classification and the fish families among Brazilian biomes. Alternatively, families that have large morphological plasticity among the species within this taxonomic level can have more representatives in a single FTG. In this sense, we aim to define how many families are clustered by a FTG and how many FTGs can be present in each family.
Material and methods
Study area. The Serra da Bodoquena is situated in the southwest of the state of Mato Grosso do Sul, in the Central-Western region of Brazil. This karst formation dates to the Precambrian (Sallun Filho, Karmann, 2007). The region still contains large remnants of its native vegetative cover, especially in the highland areas, that harbors headwater streams of the Upper Paraguay River basin (ICMBIO, 2013). The Serra da Bodoquena National Park (PNSB) is located on the western border of the Serra da Bodoquena. Created in 2000, the park is the only federal fully protected conservation unit in Mato Grosso do Sul. Covering 76,000 hectares, the PNSB is divided into Northern and Southern portions, each one containing a single main drainage. At the northern portion, the PNSB is drained by Salobra River that flows into Miranda River basin, the largest river basin in the region. Altitude of Salobra River ranges from 620 to 130 m.a.s.l. The Southern portion the PNSB is drained by the Perdido River, that occurs between 560 to 390 m.a.s.l. Perdido River flows into Apa River, the main watershed, and the southern limit of Upper Paraguay River basin (Fig. 1). Although most of the rivers are within the park limits, the headwaters of both rivers are outside the PNSB boundaries, without any protection. Besides these two major rivers, in its southern portion the PNSB also includes the headwaters from Formoso and Prata rivers, both flowing into the Miranda River basin.
FIGURE 1| Main drainages of Serra da Bodoquena. The Miranda River watershed (blue) and the Perdido River watershed (red). Highlighted lines represent Salobra River in the North and Perdido River in the South. In green, the Formoso River watershed, a tributary of Miranda drainage. Black dots represent the points of underwater observations of the fish species.
Underwater observations. Underwater observations of interactions were made from 2005 to 2018 during the day and night, totalizing 360 h of snorkeling (280 days and 80 nights), using ad libitum and focal animal techniques (Lehner, 1999) on 10 stream stretches ranging from 100 to 2,000 m in length (Fig. 1). Observations were done in the Miranda River basin tributaries (Salobrinha stream, Salobra River, Sucuri River, Prata River, Formoso River and Formosinho stream); and in the headwaters and main course of the Perdido River. During the nocturnal observations, waterproof flashlights with red filters were used to minimize disturbance of individuals. Information about day or night time period, behavioral characteristics, mesohabitat use, vertical (water column) and horizontal (margin or main channel) distributions were recorded for each individual or group of individuals. Due to the particular physical characteristics within and among streams, marginal habitats were considered as those shallow and near stream banks, with low current, abundant aquatic plants and deposition of allochthonous material, such as leaves, logs and branches. In contrast, the main channel category was the stretch between lateral marginal habitats, with faster current, greater depth and a more homogeneous bottom substrate. Mesohabitats were classified in three physiognomies following Bisson et al. (2007): pools, to deep, low current and fine substrate (like sand, silt and clay) environments; riffles to shallow, fast current water environment, with coarse substrate and partially submerged pebbles and boulders; and runs as the intermediate environments between pools and riffles, with submerged rocks and fine to coarse substrate. Confirmation of species determination was made through the comparison among voucher specimens previously collected by other projects developed in the region and deposited at the Coleção Zoológica da Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (ZUFMS-PIS; Tab. S1).
To characterize the body-length distribution of the assemblages and to test the horizonal stratification of fish species according to their size, standard lengths were compiled from Britski et al. (2007) or from the original descriptions of the species. Body size classes followed Castro (1999) and Castro, Polaz (2020), in which small species were defined as being up to 15 cm in length, medium sized were between 15.1 and 44.9 cm, and large were those above 45 cm. To test the horizontal stratification, size classes (small, medium and large) and habitat distribution (margin or main channel) were tested through a Pearson’s chi-square test performed in R software (R Development Core Team, 2020).
Functional trophic groups. Classification of functional trophic groups follows Sazima (1986), Sabino, Zuanon (1998), Casatti et al. (2001), and Brejão et al. (2013) according to foraging tactics and habitat use. The terms nektonic, nektobenthic and benthic follow the definitions of Lincoln et al. (1995): nektonic species swim freely in the water column, nektobenthic species are typically associated with the stream bottom and swim actively in the lower portion of the water column, and benthic species live on, in, or in close association with the stream bottom.
In order to compare our results within the Brazilian biomes context, a review of FTGs from Neotropical ichthyofauna is provided, based on the studies of Sazima (1986), Sabino, Zuanon (1998), Casatti et al. (2001), Brejão et al. (2013) and Freitas et al. (2021). The first study encompasses results from Pantanal, the next three from Amazon and the last from the Atlantic Forest.
A total of 83 species were observed and recorded, and were represented by Characiformes (with 47 species), followed by Siluriformes (23), Cichliformes (7), Gymnotiformes (3), Cyprinodontiformes (1), Beloniformes (1) and Synbranchiformes (1). The fish fauna is mostly composed of small species (N = 53, 64%), followed by medium sized (N = 20, 24%) and large species (N = 10, 12%). In terms of horizontal stratification, a significant difference was found between the richness of marginal and main channel habitats (X² = 11.66, p < 0.05) with small fish species predominantly occupying marginal habitats and large species associated with the main channel habitats (Fig. 2).
FIGURE 2| Distribution of sizes classes of fish from Serra da Bodoquena stream according to instream horizontal occupation.
The ichthyofauna was composed mainly of nektonic (N = 37; 44%), followed by benthic (N = 29; 35%) and nektobenthic species (N = 17; 20%). Seventeen feeding tactics were used by the species (Tab. S1) and are described below. The most common feeding tactics were Diurnal Backwater Drift Feeder, with 18% of the species (N = 15); followed by Grazers, with 14% (N = 11) and Crepuscular to Nocturnal bottom predators with 11% (N = 9). Characiformes showed the highest number of feeding tactics (11), followed by Siluriformes (5).
Functional trophic groups. Ambush and stalking predators:Nektonic or nektobenthic species that ambush and/or stalk prey (Sazima, 1986; Sabino, Zuanon, 1998). This FTG included five medium-sized representatives from Characiformes and Cichliformes and three families (Erythrinidae, Serrasalmidae and Cichlidae). Hoplerythrinus unitaeniatus (Spix & Agassiz, 1829) and Hoplias malabaricus (Bloch, 1794) were observed stationary on the bottom near the margins waiting to ambush prey during twilight and at night. Serrasalmus marginatus Valenciennes, 1837was observed alone during the day, facing the prey while hiding its compressed body that matches submersed branches and roots. The cichlids Crenicichla lepidota Heckel, 1840 and C. vittata Heckel, 1840 usually used backwaters, transiting between the margins near the bottom and ambushing small fishes or invertebrates; C. vittata was more common immediately upstream and downstream of riffles.
Browsers:Nektonic fishes that bite off small pieces of plants (Sazima, 1986). This FTG was represented by two small Cheirodontinae species. Although they have not been observed eating plants, Odontostilbe pequira (Steindachner, 1882) and Serrapinnus calliurus (Boulenger, 1900) formed large mixed shoals, foraging on filamentous algae on roots or rock surface or in high clusters of algae of about 3 m length that grow from the bottom to the surfaces in streams with small flow.
Crepuscular to nocturnal bottom predators:This group was represented bynight shift species that explore the bottom of the water courses looking for small prey (Sazima, 1986). This FTG was composed of nine benthic and nektobenthic small to large specimens of catfishes from the families Heptapteridae, Pimelodidae, Pseudopimelodidae, Trichomycteridae and Aspredinidae. Pseudoplatystoma reticulatum Eigenmann & Eigenmann, 1889, the larger representative of this FTG, remained stationary during the day under mats of floating macrophytes or inside naturally-formed holes in the margins, known as “locas”. During the night these individuals move along the bottom of the main channel exploring the environment with their barbels looking for prey, especially benthic fish species or tetras that remain stationary near the margins during the night. The same behavior and habitat use were observed for Pseudopimelodus mangurus (Valenciennes, 1835)that foraged exclusively alone. The other pseudopimelodid species, Rhyacoglanis paranensis Shibatta & Vari, 2017, actively foraged together in the stream beds in shoals of up to ten individuals. Imparfinis schubarti (Gomes, 1956) and Pimelodella taenioptera Miranda Ribeiro, 1914(Fig. 3D) move into shoals of up to 20 individuals, roving the streambed, looking for invertebrates among the pebbles by using their barbels to investigate the substrate wherever they locate prey. Although I. schubarti was more associated with fast-flowing waters, P. taenioptera used all mesohabitats, from riffles to pools (see Severo-Neto et al., 2015b). Rhamdia quelen (Quoy & Gaimard, 1824)was observed alone or in small shoals of up to five individuals. In isolated pools, where it occurred alone, R. quelen could be observed using the whole water column, capturing moths or adults of Ephemeroptera at the water surface during the night. Ituglanis herberti (Miranda Ribeiro, 1940) and Phenacorhamdia sp. are reophilic species that occurred in the interstices of the pebbles under fast flowing mesohabitats, commonly associated with submersed or floating leaf litter. Bunocephalus doriae Boulenger, 1902 remained stationary during the day on soft mud substrates and leaf litter, possibly to mimic dead plant fragments with its body shape. During the night this species became active on this same substrate, probing its snout in the soft mud and litter to capture small prey.
FIGURE 3| Representative images of the fish assemblage from Serra da Bodoquena streams. A. Farlowella paraguayensis among twigs and leaf litter in the substrate; B. Hypostomus froehlichi between boulders; C. Creagrutus meridionalis foraging near a sandy substrate; D. Pimelodella taenioptera and Astyanax lacustris foraging among leaf litter in the substrate; E. Hyphessobrycon eques and Jupiaba acanthogaster using marginal vegetation; F. Characidium zebra using the sit-and-wait tactics on the sandy substrate; G. Psalidodon marionae foraging near the rocky substrate; H. Salminus brasiliensis swimming in the water column; I. Prochilodus lineatus foraging near patches of vegetation. Photos: Renato M. Romero and Fabrício B. Teresa.
Crepuscular to nocturnal drift feeders:Species with crepuscular to nocturnal habits that capture drifting prey in the water column and surface (Casatti et al., 2001; Brejão et al., 2013). Tatia neivai (Ihering, 1930) was the only species representing this FTG and remained stationary during the day, notably inside hollow submerged branches, and in spite of having a siluriform body pattern, usually associated with bottom activity, they were observed actively foraging throughout the water column during the night, capturing prey from the substrate to the surface.
Diggers:Species that actively dig into the substrate to feed on benthic organisms (Sazima, 1986). This FTG was only composed of the small Loricariidae species Hemiodontichthys acipenserinus (Kner, 1853) that occurred on sand patches in the streams bed at night, using its laterally expanded snout to dig in the substrate and to stir the sediment while looking for benthic organisms.
Diurnal backwater drift feeder:These nektonic fish species occur close to the margins in backwaters and forage on items suspended in the water column or close to the substrate (Sazima, 1986; Casatti et al., 2001). This FTG contained 15 species, mainly the small Characidae fishes with laterally compressed body that occurred mainly in mixed shoals and were associated with roots or submersed macrophytes. Hyphessobrycon eques (Steindachner, 1882) (Fig. 3E)and Moenkhausia bonita Benine, Castro & Sabino, 2004 are the most conspicuous species in Salobra drainage due to their remarkable colors and were found next to the margins. Aphyocharax anisitsi Eigenmann & Kennedy, 1903 and Bryconamericus exodon Eigenmann, 1907 are active swimmers that were observed close to the margins and fed on autochthonous items. Jupiaba acanthogaster (Eigenmann, 1911) (Fig. 3E), Psellogrammus kennedyi (Eigenmann, 1903) and Moenkhausia oligolepis (Günther, 1864) were usually observed in shoals of about 20 individuals, using from the mid-water up to the upper surface areas for feeding. Phenacogaster tegatus (Eigenmann, 1911)and Poptella paraguayensis (Eigenmann, 1907) occurred in small shoals of conspecifics of up to six individuals and remained stationary at mid-water, investigating items that were sinking or at the surface. Hemigrammus lunatus Durbin, 1918was the less common tetra species, occurring in shaded areas upstream or downstream to riffles, next to the margins. Piabarchus analis (Eigenmann, 1914)and P. torrenticola Mahnert & Géry, 1988 occurred in conspecific shoals on shallow areas, next to fallen logs or roots. Creagrutus meridionalis Vari & Harold, 2001 occurred in shoals of up 30 individuals on sandy patches of low-flowing current (Fig. 3C). Astyanax sp. 2 and Deuterodon luetkenii (Boulenger, 1887)were the two tetras of this FTG found exclusively in Perdido River drainage, especially in calm water with dense vegetation near the margins.
Diurnal channel drift feeders:Nektonic species that mostly occupy the main channel during the day while foraging on food items drifting at the surface or mid-water (Sazima, 1986; Casatti et al., 2001; Brejão et al., 2013). This FTG was composed of 9 species, mainly of the small- to medium-sized tetra species with laterally compressed bodies and the larger “piraputangas” Brycon hilarii (Valenciennes, 1850). The most abundant species, Astyanax lineatus (Perugia, 1891), occurred in conspecific shoals up to 50 individuals. They foraged on items from the bottom to the surface of the streams, especially in shaded areas or next to fallen logs; Astyanax abramis (Jenyns, 1842) and A. lacustris (Lütken, 1875) (Fig. 3D)occurred in mixed shoals from mid water to the surface. Psalidodon marionae (Eigenmann, 1911)was the least common species of tetra, occurring alone or in small shoals of up to 5 individuals near the margins (Fig. 3G). Astyanax sp. 1 occurred in the midwater of runs. Brachychalcinus retrospina Boulenger, 1892was the only deep-bodied species of this FTG. It occurred in small conspecific groups of 5–10 individuals in small pools below waterfalls. Brycon hilarii was the largest species of this FTG and occurred from mid water to the surface, foraging on items that fall from the riparian forest, or jumping out of water to pick fruits from low level branches of the trees (Reys et al., 2009). Bryconops melanurus (Bloch, 1794) occurred in shoals of up to 10 individuals roving close to the surface of the water and actively capturing insects and fruits that felt from the surrounding riparian forest.
Diurnal surface pickers: Species that swim near the surface, especially in backwaters, picking floating organisms or particles of organic debris (Sazima, 1986). This FTG was composed of one small species of Lebiasinidae, Characidae and Poeciliidae that occupy shallow densely vegetated margins and feed on invertebrates and debris. Pyrrhulina australis Eigenmann & Kennedy, 1903was observed usually alone, next to surface on marginal habitats, swimming among the branches or roots of aquatic plants. Xenurobrycon macropus Myers & Miranda Ribeiro, 1945 was observed always in conspecific shoals up to 40 individuals, swimming in mid-water to the surface, along the periphery of aquatic vegetation mats. The guppy, Poecilia reticulata Peters, 1859, despite being an exotic species in this region, was observed in impacted drainages, such as urban stretches of the stream, where it occupied shallow pools next to the margins, picking debris at the water surface.
Grazers:Benthic species that graze on attached algae from the substrate (Sabino, Zuanon, 1998; Brejão et al., 2013). In this FTG were 11 small to large fishes, mostly represented by Loricariidae species, that have morphological adaptations such as dorso-ventrally flattened body and ventrally oriented mouth, for scraping their food from hard surfaces. Hypostomus basilisko Tencatt, Zawadzki & Froehlich, 2014, H. froehlichi Zawadzki, Nardi & Tencatt, 2021, H. perdido Zawadzki, Tencatt & Froehlich, 2014and Hypostomus sp. 2 were the largest grazers observed. These grazers occupied the bottom of pools during the day in shaded areas or attached upside down on fallen logs. During the night they move to shallow areas to graze on algae from boulders and flat limestone rock surfaces (Fig. 3C). Ancistrus sp. occurred in fast-flowing habitats, such as rapids or below waterfalls, attached to the rocky substrate. Although this species could be observed during the day, larger individuals were more active during the night. Loricaria luciae Thomas, Rodriguez, Carvallaro, Froehlich & Castro, 2013 and Rineloricaria lanceolata (Günther, 1868) occurred on the bottom of pools and runs, usually on rocky substrates, matching its color pattern with the natural patches of light and shade of the substrate. The twig catfish Farlowella paraguayensis Retzer & Page, 1997 (Fig. 3A), whiptail catfish Rineloricaria parva (Boulenger, 1895)and the Hypoptopomatinae Otocinclus vittatus Regan, 1904 mostly occupied soft leaf-litter substrates, where the first two species positioned their elongated stick-shaped body with submerged twigs and branches of submersed plant matter. The only non-loricariid grazer was the characiform Parodon nasus Kner, 1859 (Parodontidae) that occupied fast-flowing habitats, usually facing upstream while using its upper-jaw teeth to scrape algae and periphyton from flat limestone rocks.
Grubbers:Benthic species that feed on small benthic invertebrates through substrate probing while moving (Sazima, 1986). This FTG included two small Callichthyidae species that use their barbels to probe the uppermost layer of the substrate while foraging and eventually capturing prey. Callichthys callichthys (Linnaeus, 1758) and Corydoras aeneus (Gill, 1858) were observed in impacted stretches where erosive processes increased the amount of sand deposited in the bottom of the streams. Callichthys were observed alone during the night next to the margins and Corydoras occurred in shoals up to 20 individuals during the day, while exploring shallow low-flowing habitats.
Mud-eaters:Fish species that ingest soft substrate to feed on organic matter and minute organisms (Sazima, 1986). This FTG was composed of two small benthic Steindachnerina speciesand the large nektobenthic Prochilodus lineatus (Valenciennes, 1837), Steindachnerina brevipinna (Eigenmann & Eigenmann, 1889)and S. nigrotaenia (Boulenger, 1902). They are toothless species that occupy the bottom of the water courses in mixed shoals, picking mud using a head-standing position in pools and runs, especially over submerged leaf litter. Prochilodus lineatus was observed in large shoals of about 50 individuals, occupying the lower half of the water column and always foraging on rocky substrate or submerged logs, where they use the numerous small teeth implanted in their lips to scrape the surface (Fig. 3I).
Nibblers: Thesenektonic fishes forage by picking and biting food items on solid substrates (Sazima, 1986). In this FTG were five medium and large bodied-sized fishes, such as Leporinus friderici (Bloch, 1794)and Megaleporinus obtusidens (Valenciennes, 1837)(Anostomidae) thatoccupied from the midwater to the bottom of the water column, occurring with conspecifics or forming larger groups with Piaractus mesopotamicus (Holmberg, 1887) and Prochilodus lineatus shoals. They nibble fragments of fruits or invertebrates on the bottom or cut small pieces of aquatic macrophytes for food. Leporinus striatus Kner, 1858 and Leporellus vittatus (Valenciennes, 1850) moved alone exploring the bottom and the margins while picking invertebrates and fallen fruits from the streambed.
Nocturnal invertebrate pickers:Nektobenthic species that capture prey close to the substrate during the night (Brejão et al., 2013). In this FTG were three medium size Gymnotiformes from the Apteronotidae (Apteronotus caudimaculosus de Santana, 2003), Gymnotidae (Gymnotus carapo Linnaeus, 1758) and Sternopygidae (Sternopygus macrurus (Bloch & Schneider, 1801)). These knifefishes move near the margin and among the boulders and logs looking for aquatic invertebrates inside litter banks, such as Odonata and Megaloptera larvae and adult shrimps.
Pickers and browsers:Nektobenthic species that pick and browse food items dispersed on the substrate or in organic debris, selecting food through their gill rakers (Sabino, Zuanon, 1998; Brejão et al., 2013). In this FTG were five small and medium Cichliformes, with daytime activity in low-current and highly heterogeneous habitats. The cichlids Aequidens plagiozonatus Kullander, 1984, Australoheros sp., Bujurquina vittata (Heckel, 1840) and Cichlasoma dimerus (Heckel, 1840)were observed usually alone or in pairs, exploring and defending areas close to the margins and chasing off other cichlids that came nearby.The non-native tilapia Coptodon rendalli (Boulenger, 1897)occurred in the Perdido drainage, where adult individuals occupied the water column close to the margins. Shoals of juveniles of about 10 cm total length used densely vegetated margins to pick food from the substrate and among the submersed plants.
Pursuit predators:Nektonic species that capture prey through pursuing (Brejão et al., 2013). This FTG was composed of five species, from small to large Characidae and Belonidae fishes with elongated, torpedo-like bodies. Acestrorhynchus pantaneiro Menezes, 1992and Oligosarcus perdido Ribeiro, Cavallaro & Froehlich, 2007 occurred alone or in conspecific shoals, attacking small fishes next to the surface from the margins in the direction of the main channel. Aphyocharax dentatus Eigenmann & Kennedy, 1903was usually associated with runs, occurring alone or in shoals of 4 to 6 individuals and attacking fish even half their size; piscivory of this species was also demonstrated by Corrêa et al. (2009). Salminus brasiliensis (Cuvier, 1816) occurred in the main channel of the streams (Fig. 3H); adults usually alone and juveniles forming small shoals, mixed with Brycon hilarii adults, an example of predatory mimicry (Bessa et al., 2011). Potamorrhaphis eigenmanni Miranda Ribeiro, 1915 was observed alone or in up to five-individual shoals, hovering near the surface and striking fallen terrestrial invertebrates or small fish species, like Xenurobrycon macropus.
Sit-and-wait predators:Benthic species that remain still while observing the surroundings and foraging on the nearby prey (Sazima, 1986; Brejão et al., 2013). This FTG was composed of three species in two families (Crenuchidae and Synbranchidae) from two different orders (Characiformes and Synbranchiformes). The small Characidium species, C. borellii (Boulenger, 1895)and Characidium aff. zebra, remain stationary over a rock, faced towards the stream flow, searching the nearby substrate by moving only their head while looking for prey (Fig. 3F). Characidium borellii occupies the downstream stretches of shallow riffles. The second species was more often distributed over the entire stream bed. Synbranchus marmoratus Bloch, 1795uses its elongated finless body to move amidst the interstices of the rocks during the day, at twilight and during the night. It puts its head or half of its body out of the rock crevices (similarly to the behavior of marine eels) and waits for preys, especially benthic invertebrates and fish.
Surface strikers:Species that occupy the uppermost layer of the water column, quickly capturing prey, such as fish or invertebrates that fall from the riparian forest (Goulding, Carvalho, 1984; Brejão et al., 2013). This FTG was formed by the small nektonic Gasteropelecidae Thoracocharax stellatus (Kner, 1858). The species has hypertrophied pectoral fins and expansion of the coracoid bones, such as is observed in Carnegiella species, another Amazonian gasteropelecid species. Thoracocharax stellatus was observed during daylight periods, moving from the margins to the main channel and attacking invertebrates on the surface.
State-of-art of functional trophic groups among inland waters of Brazilian biomes. The compilation of FTGs defined in the available literature resulted in a total of 18 tactics represented in 31 families. Our study resulted in new data for the families Parodontidae, Pimelodidae, Prochilodontidae, Serrasalmidae; and two new FTGs to Characidae (browser and pursuit predator). The crepuscular to nocturnal bottom predator was the richest FTG with nine families (Fig. 4). Characidae was the family with more FTGs, with six tactics (Fig. 5). Nonetheless, 21 families (68%) were clustered in a single FTG regardless of biome (Fig. 4). Fourteen FTGs were shared between our results and those found for Amazonian species, and eight FTGs were shared with species from both Amazonian and Atlantic Forest streams (Fig. 4).
FIGURE 4| Compilation of number of families on each Functional Trophic Group among different biomes in Brazil. Bar colors represent the shared FTGs among biomes considering Sazima (1986), Sabino, Zuanon (1998), Casatti et al. (2001), Brejão et al. (2013), Freitas et al. (2021), and this work. Blue bar: FTGs registered in Pantanal+Amazon+Atlantic Forest; Red bar: FTGs registered in Pantanal+Amazon; Green bar: FTG registered only in Amazon. Silhouettes represent the families with more records on each FTG.
FIGURE 5| Number of accumulated Functional Trophic Groups by fish families considering Brazilian inland freshwaters works from Sazima (1986), Sabino, Zuanon (1998), Casatti et al. (2001), Brejão et al. (2013), Freitas et al. (2021), and this work.
Physical habitat structure is a major factor influencing behavior and ecology of stream fish (Gorman, Karr, 1978; Smokorowski, Pratt, 2007; Dias et al., 2010; Ortega et al., 2021). A karst terrain such as the Serra da Bodoquena provides a distinct pattern of physical environmental heterogeneity in the southern portion of Upper Paraguay River basin (UPRB). While the Pantanal floodplain is located at an altitude of about 100 m.a.s.l. and smooth declivity, Serra da Bodoquena reaches from 200 to 800 m.a.s.l. (Sallun Filho, Karmann, 2007). This range in altitude contributes to the presence of fast flowing rivers that are less often found in the UPRB, and, consequently, contains reophilic species, as Ancistrus, Phenacorhamdia and Parodon which rarely occur in the floodplain. The association of some of the fish species to fast flowing habitats result in the convergence of morphological traits shared by species from different FTGs and taxonomical families, i.e., expanded pectoral fins that deflects the water current and anchors the fish to the substrate. This feature has been described for the sit-and-wait predators Crenuchidae, the grazers Parodontidae (Casatti, Castro, 2006) and the crepuscular to nocturnal predators Heptapteridae. From a microhabitat perspective, the patches of sand, pebbles, boulders and limestone rocks in the substrate constitute a diverse mosaic of foraging and refuge sites for the fish fauna that are not available in the floodplain. The large surface areas of boulders and limestone rocks are conducive to the growth of periphyton and other algae, which are fundamental for the diet of about the 15% of the studied species, especially for grazers of the families Loricariidae and Parodontidae. Furthermore, pebbles act as perches for sit-and-wait predators (such as Characidium species)from where they observe the surroundings while looking for invertebrates, or as foraging sites to Heptapteridae species that actively probe among the small rocks for small prey. Nonetheless, the narrow spaces available among the pebbles acts as refuges for adults of slender catfishes, such as Trichomycterus and Phenacorhamdia, and Loricariidae fry.
Sand patches develop suitable habitats to psammophilous (sand-dwelling) species that tend to have a sand-color pattern to remain cryptic relative to the substrate, performing sit-and-wait tactics, such as Heptapteridae, Crenuchidae, or buried in the sand during daytime and acting as nocturnal invertebrate pickers tactics, such as Rhamphichthyidae, families cited to Amazonian streams (Zuanon et al., 2006). While sand patches are more common at higher-order streams and rivers, their presence in high the altitude streams from Serra da Bodoquena is associated with anthropogenic erosive processes, such as conversion of native vegetation to agriculture, urban influence or road construction outside the protected-conservation units. Due to the recent and unnatural sources of sand inputs to the stream beds, no true sand-dwelling species, such as those described by Zuanon et al. (2006) and their own tactics, were observed in Serra da Bodoquena streams. However, these patches were remarkably occupied by large shoals of Creagrutus meridionalis and the benthic-dwelling Corydoras aeneus. Indeed, the high abundance of C. aeneus has already been pointed out as an indicator of the loss of environmental quality in this region (Casatti et al., 2010). We suggest that abundances of C. meridionalis should be considered as a bioindicator of recent siltation in the streambed.
Riparian forests play a key role in sustaining the aquatic diversity in the Neotropics (Dala-Corte et al., 2020). Despite the anthropogenic influences in some reaches of the studied streams, riparian forests are present at different extents. Serra da Bodoquena streams have a diverse and well preserved riparian forest with high vegetation density within the conservation unit boundaries. Although we did not focus on gathering data about instream physical elements, the allochthonous input is an important factor shaping fish distribution and abundance in streams (Angermeier, Karr, 1983; Henry et al., 1994; Mazzoni, Iglesias-Rios, 2002; Kawaguchi et al., 2003; Perkins et al.,2018). From the FTGs perspective, the riparian forest provides an input of wood and leaves that form the litter accumulations that are used by small fish seeking for refuge and food. Physical elements such as tree roots provide shelter to small backwater drift-feeder fishes, as well as cover for ambush and stalking predators. Fallen trunks become feeding sites for grazers that scrap the periphyton and the hollow logs function as day-time shelters used by crepuscular to nocturnal bottom predators, such as the driftwood catfish Tatia neivai. Although the habit of hiding in logs during the daytime is known for auchenipterids (Rodriguez et al., 1990), there is evidence that Tatia abundance is related to streams with more forested cover in Meridional Amazon (Casatti et al., 2020). Taking one species as model, wood inputs are an essential component for Tatia species to persist. The environmental heterogeneity and habitats related to the presence of fallen trees and logs is critical for maintaining the diversity of species as a whole (Pusey, Arthington, 2003; Willis et al., 2005; Arrington, Winemiller, 2006; Pettit et al., 2013).
Along with the clear and well-recognized role of riparian forests for stream-dwelling fish communities, the instream vegetated margins are fundamental components to sustaining fish fauna diversity. Instream vegetation in Serra da Bodoquena streams is represented by a high specific richness of aquatic macrophytes with more than 40 species catalogued for the region (Scremin-Dias et al., 1999). These heterogeneous, densely vegetated patches constitute the main habitat of many fish species that use them for shelter and food, especially the small bodied-sized fish. These small fish associated with the aquatic plants corresponded to 40% of the ichthyofauna richness from Serra da Bodoquena streams and were predominantly associated to the marginal habitats. We acknowledge that our study focuses on adult fishes while juveniles of larger fishes can also occupy marginal habitats. Marginal habitats can also be an integral home range of small fish (Ceneviva-Bastos et al., 2010). The decrease in quality or total loss of marginal habitats can increase the extinction risk for small bodied-size fish, which already are the most threatened group of Neotropical ichthyofauna (Castro, Polaz, 2020). The streams in much of this region are a focus of ecotourism activities and tend to have protected riparian margins with strict rules about conserving vegetation. However, this riparian integrity is not typical in most of streams in the Formoso River basin, especially those historically used for livestock activities. In such areas, streams were used as source of water for cattle, that increased the trampling and siltation of the margins and totally suppressed aquatic macrophytes.
Our results reinforce the need for detailed knowledge of natural history of the tropical fish fauna to inform conservation policies and to sustain the future management and protection of stream-dwelling fishes. Also, this work provides a comprehensive comparison of functional trophic groups across Brazilian biomes. Despite the possible subjectivity associated with the categorization of species provided by different observers, the morphological constraints of the species limit the later categorization among FTGs. For example, the mouth orientation downwards of Loricariidae species is strictly associated with bottom foraging, typical for grazers. In contrast, the upwards mouth orientation in Lebiasinidae limits this family as surface pickers. Indeed, the two more consistent families regarding FTG classification across biomes were Heptapteridae and Sternopygidae (see Fig. 4), reflecting the biological features that constrains them from belonging to other groups, even among different drainages. On the other hand, the Characidae and Crenuchidae were the families with species belonging to the highest number of FTGs. The Characidae is one of the most diverse Neotropical families and has a wide range of species occupying several niches and, consequently, resulting in the highest number of functional groups. The Crenuchidae in turn have a notable differentiation between the Crenuchus and Characidium genera, in which the first is morphologically similar to midwater tetras and the second is a benthic species. In this way, the first can be considered as backwater or channel drift feeder while the second is more prone to use sit-and-wait or ambush tactics. In spite of these two cases, more than half of the Brazilian fish families belonged to only one FTG, indicating that the use of FTG can be useful tool, but also that this method of classification validates the phylogenetic niche conservatism through direct observation of the habits and foraging tactics employed by the fishes.
Data about species foraging and social behavior in their natural habitats can help elucidate distribution patterns and microhabitat preference that reinforce a posteriori inference of studies using functional traits. As an example, Rhamdia quelen and Tatia neivai would parsimoniously be categorized as bottom feeders considering only their ecomorphological attributes. However, our direct observation reveals that these species are able to use the whole water column during foraging. Nonetheless, our results sheds light over the distribution of the often-neglected small fish species and their association to the margins of streams. Serra da Bodoquena has the potential to become a landmark in terms of stream’s conservation and, from the ecosystem perspective, a source area to metapopulations across the entire basin, especially for small sized fish. During dry season in the Pantanal floodplain, most of the small-sized fish are retained in natural lagoons known as baías. In fact, a single baía can harbor more than a third of the amount of the species in the entire basin (Severo-Neto et al., 2015a). Therefore, these habitats are important repositories of diversity and genetic pool of fishes which, in turn, play essential roles in the ecosystem dynamics. However, consecutive dry seasons in the last years have dried a large number of baías, consequently driving the loss of diversity and fish abundance. The Pantanal domain has lost 74% of water surface from 1985 to 2020 (Watanabe, 2021), which represents the highest water loss among all Brazilian biomes. The maintenance of small streams, which tend to be perennial, can be a key to avoid the simplification of fish communities in the Pantanal as a whole. The knowledge of natural history of the fish fauna in the Serra da Bodoquena streams makes a fundamental contribution to better understanding of how to conserve this unique set of species from Upper Paraguay River basin. Moreover, we emphasize the need for future research to further develop the Functional Trophic Groups classification based on direct observation of the fishes in their natural habitats. This technique can provide reliable and comparable information about species distribution at low cost across many streams from diverse freshwater ecosystems to provide general concepts of food-web structure and function.
The authors are grateful for the reviewers’ considerations that enriched the work, as well as the considerations provided by Mônica Ceneviva-Bastos, Denise C. Rossa-Feres, Camilo Roa-Fuentes and Maurício Cetra in the manuscript development. To Renato Romero and Fabrício Teresa that obtained the photos of Fig. 3 during the project CNPq 555096/2006–8. To Alan Covich, for suggestions in the manuscript and English review. The authors are especially thankful for the efforts of Prof. Otávio Froehlich (in memoriam) that first initiated the works in Serra da Bodoquena that culminated in this article. LC receives grant from CNPq (304403/2021–0).
Angermeier PL, Karr JR. Fish communities along environmental gradients in a system of tropical streams. Environ Biol Fishes. 1983; 9:117–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00690857
Arnold SJ. Anniversary essay: Too much natural history, or too little? Animal Beh. 2003; 65(6):1065–68. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2003.2143
Arrington DA, Winemiller KO. Habitat affinity, the seasonal flood pulse, and community assembly in the littoral zone of a Neotropical floodplain river. J North Am Benthol Soc. 2006; 25(1):126–41. https://doi.org/10.1899/0887-3593(2006)25[126:HATSFP]2.0.CO;2
Balian EV, Segers H, Martens K, Lévéque C. The freshwater animal diversity assessment: an overview of the results. In: Balian EV, Lévêque C, Segers H, Martens K, editors. Freshwater animal diversity assessment. Developments in hydrobiology, vol 198. Springer, Dordrecht; 2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8259-7_61
Bessa E, Carvalho LN, Sabino J, Tomazzelli P. Juveniles of the piscivorous dourado Salminus brasiliensis mimic the piraputanga Brycon hilarii as an alternative predation tactic. Neotrop Ichthyol. 2011; 9(2):351–54. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-62252011005000016
Bisson PA, Montgomery DR, Buffington JM. Valley segments, stream reaches, and channel units. In: Hauer FR, Lamberti GA, editors. Methods in Stream Ecology. Academic Press; 2007. p.21–47.
Brejão GL, Gerhard P, Zuanon J. Functional trophic composition of the ichthyofauna of forest streams in eastern Brazilian Amazon. Neotrop Ichthyol. 2013; 11(2):361–73. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-62252013005000006
Britski HA, Silimon KZS, Lopes BS. Peixes do Pantanal. Manual de identificação. 2ed. Brasília: Embrapa; 2007.
Bury RB. Natural history, field ecology, conservation biology and wildlife management: time to connect the dots. Herpetol Conserv Biol. 2006; 1(1):56–61. Available from: https://www.herpconbio.org/volume_1/issue_1/Bury_2006.pdf
Casatti L, Brejão GL, Carvalho FR, Silva HP, Pérez-Mayorga MA, Manzotti AR et al. Stream fish from recently deforested basins in the Meridional Amazon, Mato Grosso, Brazil. Biota Neotrop. 2020; 20(1):e20190744. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1676-0611-BN-2019-0744
Casatti L, Castro RMC. Testing the ecomorphological hypothesis in a headwater riffles fish assemblage of the rio São Francisco, southeastern Brazil. Neotrop Ichthyol. 2006; 4(2):203–14. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-62252006000200006
Casatti L, Langeani F, Castro RMC. Peixes de riacho do Parque Estadual do Morro do Diabo, Bacia do Alto Rio Paraná, SP. Biota Neotrop. 2001; 1(1–2):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1676-06032001000100005
Casatti L, Romero RM, Teresa FB, Sabino J, Langeani F. Fish community structure along a conservation gradient in Bodoquena Plateau streams, central West of Brazil. Acta Limnol Bras. 2010; 22(1):50–59. https://doi.org/10.4322/actalb.02201007
Casatti L, Teresa FB, Gonçalves-Souza T, Bessa E, Manzotti AR, Gonçalves CS et al. From forests to cattail: How does the riparian zone influence stream fish? Neotrop Ichthyol. 2012; 10(1): 205–14. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-62252012000100020
Castro RMC. Evolução da ictiofauna de riachos sul-americanos: padrões gerais e possíveis processos causais. Oecol Brasil. 1999; 6(1):139–55. https://doi.org/10.4257/oeco.2021.2502.02
Castro RMC, Polaz CNM. Small-sized fish: the largest and most threatened portion of the megadiverse neotropical freshwater fish fauna. Biota Neotrop. 2020; 20(1):e20180683. https://doi.org/10.1590/1676-0611-BN-2018-0683
Ceneviva-Bastos M, Casatti L, Rossa-Feres DC. Meso and microhabitat analysis and feeding habits of small nektonic characins (Teleostei: Characiformes) in Neotropical stream. Zoologia. 2010; 27(2):191–200. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-46702010000200006
Chiaravalloti RM, Tomas WM, Uezu A, Shirai HY, Guaraldo E, Aoki C et al. Rapid land use conversion in the Cerrado has affected water transparency in a hotspot of ecotourism, Bonito, Brazil. Trop Conserv Sci. 2022; 15:19400829221127087. https://doi.org/10.1177/19400829221127087
Corrêa CE, Hahn NS, Delariva RL. Extreme trophic segregation between sympatric fish species: the case of small sized body Aphyocharax in the Brazilian Pantanal. Hydrobiologia. 2009; 635:57–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-009-9861-2
Dala-Corte RB, Melo AS, Siqueira T, Bini LM, Martins RT, Cunico AM et al. Thresholds of freshwater biodiversity in response to riparian vegetation loss in the Neotropical region. J Appl Ecol. 2020; 57(7):1391–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13657
Dayton PK. The importance of the natural sciences to conservation. Am Nat. 2003; 162(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1086/376572
Dias MS, Magnusson WE, Zuanon J. Effects of reduced-impact logging on fish assemblages in Central Amazonia. Conserv Biol. 2010; 24(1):278–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01299.x
Elliott M, Whitfield AK, Potter I, Blaber SJM, Cyrus DP, Nordlie FG et al. The guild approach the categorizing estuarine fish assemblages: a global review. Fish Fish. 2007. 8(3):241–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2679.2007.00253.x
Franco A, Elliott M, Franzoi P, Torricelli P. Life strategies of fishes in European estuaries: the functional guild approach. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2008; 354:219–28. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps07203
Freitas PV, Montag LFA, Ilha P, Torres NR, Maia C, Deegan L et al. Local effects of deforestation on stream fish assemblages in the Amazon Savannah transitional area. Neotrop Ichthyol. 2021; 19(3):e210098. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0224-2021-0098
Fricke R, Eschmeyer WN, Fong JD. 2022. Eschmeyer’s catalog of fishes: genera/species by family/subfamily [Internet]. Available from: http://researcharchive.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalog/SpeciesByFamily.asp
Garrison LP, Link JS. Dietary guild structure of the fish community in the northeast United States continental shelf ecosystem. Mar Ecol-Prog Ser. 2000; 202: 231–40. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24862776
Gorman OT, Karr JR. Habitat structure and stream fish communities. Ecology. 1978; 59(3):507–15. https://doi.org/10.2307/1936581
Goulding M, Carvalho ML. Ecology of Amazonian needlefishes (Belonidae). Rev Bras Zool. 1984; 2(3):99–111. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81751983000300002
Greene HW, Losos JB. Systematics, natural history, and conservation: Field biologists must fight a public-image problem. BioScience. 1988; 38(7):458–62. https://doi.org/10.2307/1310949
Henry R, Uieda VS, De O Afonso AA, Kikuchi RM. Input of allochthonous matter and structure of fauna in a Brazilian headstream. Int Ver Theor Angew Limnol. 1994; 25(3):1866–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/03680770.1992.11900510
Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBIO). Plano de manejo do Parque Nacional da Serra da Bodoquena. Encarte 3 – Análise do PNSB [Internet]. 2013. Available from: www.icmbio.gov.br/portal/images/stories/docs-planos-de-manejo/Encarte3_serra_da_bodoquena.pdf
Lehner PN. Handbook of ethological methods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996.
Lincoln RJ, Boxshall GA, Clark PF. Diccionario de ecología, evolución y taxonomía. Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Económica; 1995.
Losos JB. Phylogenetic niche conservatism, phylogenetic signal and the relationship between phylogenetic relatedness and ecological similarity among species. Ecol Lett. 2008; 11(10):995–1003. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01229.x
Kawaguchi Y, Taniguchi Y, Nakano S. Terrestrial invertebrate inputs determine the local abundance of stream fishes in a forested stream. Ecol. 2003; 84(3):701–08. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[0701:TIIDTL]2.0.CO;2
Matthews WJ. Patterns in freshwater fish ecology. Norwell, Chapman & Hall; 1998.
Mazzoni R, Iglesias-Rios R. Distribution pattern of two fish species in a coastal stream in southeast Brazil. Braz J Biol. 2002; 62(1):171–78. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-69842002000100019
Murphy CA, Casals F, Solà C, Caiola N, De Sostoa A, García-Berthou E. Efficacy of population size structure as a bioassessment tool in freshwaters. Ecol Indic. 2013; 34:571–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.06.007
Nogueira C, Buckup PA, Menezes NA, Oyakawa OT, Kasecker TP, Ramos Neto MB et al. Restricted-range fishes and the conservation of Brazilian freshwaters. PLoS ONE. 2010; 5(6):e11390. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011390
Ortega JCG, Bacani I, Dorado-Rodrigues TF, Strüssmann C, Fernandes IM, Morales J et al. Effects of urbanization and environmental heterogeneity on fish assemblages in small streams. Neotrop Ichthyol. 2021; 19(3):e210050. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0224-2021-0050
Perkins DM, Durance I, Edwards FK, Grey J, Hildrew AG, Jackson M et al. Bending the rules: exploitation of allochthonous resources by a top-predator modifies size-abundance scaling in stream food webs. Ecology. 2018; 21(12):1771–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13147
Pettit NE, Warfe DM, Kennard MJ, Pusey BJ, Davies PM, Douglas MM. Dynamics of in-stream wood and its importance as fish habitat in a large tropical floodplain river. River Res Appl. 2013; 29(7):864–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.2580
Pusey BJ, Arthington AH. Importance of riparian zone to the conservation and management of freshwater fishes: A review. Mar Freshw Res. 2003; 54(1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF02041
R Development Core Team. R: The R project for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2020. Available from: https://www.r-project.org/
Reis RE, Kullander SO, Ferraris CJ Jr. Check list of freshwater fishes of South and Central America. Porto Alegre: Edipucrs; 2003.
Reys P, Sabino J, Galetti M. Frugivory by the fish Brycon hilarii (Characidae) in western Brazil. Acta Oecol. 2009; 35(1):136–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2008.09.007
Ripple WJ, Wolf C, Newsome TM, Hoffmann M, Wirsing AJ, McCauley DJ. Extinction risk is most acute for the world’s largest and smallest vertebrates. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2017; 114(40):10678–83. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1702078114
Rodriguez MA, Richardson SE, Lewis WM. Nocturnal behavior and aspects of the ecology of a driftwood catfish, Entomocorus gameroi (Auchenipteridae). Biotropica. 1990; 22(4):435–38. https://doi.org/10.2307/2388565
Root RB. The niche exploitation pattern of the blue-grey gnatcatcher. Ecol Monogr. 1967; 37:317–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942327
Sabino J, Castro RMC. Alimentação, período de atividade e distribuição espacial dos peixes de um riacho da Floresta Atlântica (sudeste do Brasil). Rev Bras Biol. 1990; 50:23–26.
Sabino J, Zuanon JAS. A stream fish assemblage in Central Amazonia: distribution, activity patterns and feeding behavior. Ichthyol Explor Freshw. 1998; 8(3):201–10.
Sallun Filho W, Karmann I. Geomorphological map of the Serra da Bodoquena karst, west-central Brazil. J Maps. 2007; 2007:282–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/jom.2007.9710845
Sazima I. Similarities in feeding behavior between some marine and freshwater fishes in two tropical communities. J Fish Biol. 1986; 29:53–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1986.tb04926.x
Scremin-Dias E, Pott VJ, Souza PR, Hora RC. Nos jardins submersos da Bodoquena: Guia para identificação das plantas aquáticas de bonito e região de Bonito/MS. Editora da Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul; 1999.
Severo-Neto F, Tencatt LFC, Costa-Pereira R, Tavares LER. Fishes from Baía da Medalha, southern Pantanal, Brazil: A 20 years review. Biota Neotrop. 2015a; 15(2):e20140116. https://doi.org/10.1590/1676-06032015011614
Severo-Neto F, Teresa FB, Froehlich O. Ecomorphology and diet reflect the spatial segregation between two Siluriformes species inhabiting a stream of the Bodoquena Plateau, in Central Brazil. Iheringia Sér Zool. 2015b; 105(1):62–68. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766201510516268
Simberloff D, Dayan T. The guild concept and the structure of ecological communities. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 1991; 22:115–43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.22.110191.000555
Smokorowski KE, Pratt TC. Effect of a change in physical structure and cover on fish and fish habitat in freshwater ecosystems – a review and meta-analysis. Environ Rev. 2007; 15:15–45. https://doi.org/10.1139/a06-007
Specziár A, Rezsu ET. Feeding guilds and food resource partitioning in a lake fish assemblage: an ontogenetic approach. J Fish Biol. 2009; 75(1):247–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2009.02283.x
Tewksbury JJ, Anderson JG, Bakker JD, Billo TJ, Dunwiddie PW, Groom MJ et al. Natural history’s place in science and society. BioScience. 2014, 64(4):300–10. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biu032
Uieda VS. Ocorrência e distribuição dos peixes em um riacho de água doce. Rev Bras Biol. 1984; 44:203–13.
Watanabe P. Pantanal perde 74% da água desde 1985, e pesquisadores dizem que Brasil está secando [Internet]. Folha de São Paulo; 2021. Available from: https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/ambiente/2021/08/pantanal-perde-75-da-agua-desde-1985-e-pesquisadores-dizem-que-brasil-esta-secando.shtml
Willis SC, Winemiller KO, Lopez-Fernandez H. Habitat structural complexity and morphological diversity of fish assemblages in a neotropical floodplain river. Oecologia. 2005; 142:284–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1723-z
Zuanon J, Bockmann FA, Sazima I. A remarkable sand-dwelling fish assemblage from central Amazonia, with comments on the evolution of psammophily in South American freshwater fishes. Neotrop Ichthyol. 2006; 4(1):107–18. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-62252006000100012
Francisco Severo-Neto: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing-original draft, Writing-review and editing.
Gabriel L. Brejão: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing-review and editing.
Lilian Casatti: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing-review and editing.
The author declares no competing interests.
How to cite this article
Severo-Neto F, Brejão GL, Casatti L. Fish functional trophic groups in headwater karst streams from the Upper Paraguay River basin. Neotrop Ichthyol. 2023; 21(1):e220103. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0224-2022-0103
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0
© 2023 The Authors.
Diversity and Distributions Published by SBI
Accepted February 2, 2023 by Evelyn Habit
Submitted May 27, 2022
Epub March 20, 2023