Valter M. Azevedo-Santos1 , Marlene S. Arcifa2 , Marcelo F. G. Brito3 , Angelo A. Agostinho4 , Robert M. Hughe5,6 , Jean R.S. Vitule7 , Daniel Simberloff8 , Julian D. Olden9 and Fernando M. Pelicice10
The Neotropical realm supports the greatest known diversity of freshwater fish in the world, including over 6,000 described species (Albert et al., 2020). These fishes vary considerably in length, from mere centimeters to meters (Ferraris Jr., 2003; Castro, Polaz, 2020), and they display complex biogeographic patterns at multiple spatial extents. Freshwater fishes from the Neotropical region also display disproportionally high functional diversity (Toussaint et al., 2016), perform critical ecological functions (Reys et al., 2009), and provide many important ecosystem services, particularly artisanal and commercial fisheries (e.g., Isaac et al., 2015). Fish are also used in countless products such as jewelry and other objects (Olden et al., 2020), contribute to medicinal treatments (Alves, Rosa, 2006), and provide many other services. This rich biodiversity, however, has been eroded, degraded, or threatened with extinction (Reis et al., 2016; Pelicice et al., 2017; Vitule et al., 2017; ICMBio, 2018).
Mining is one of several activities that have affected Neotropical fish diversity (Pelicice et al., 2017). Mining extracts various materials (e.g., sand, oil, metals) and is conducted near or within waterbodies, generating a variety of wide-ranging negative consequences. For instance, successive oil spills from petroleum wells or pipelines in the Amazon basin (especially in Peru) have damaged fish assemblages in several rivers (Azevedo-Santos et al., 2016; Fraser, 2016). Another emblematic example was the recent rupture of tailings dams in southeastern Brazil, when toxic mine waste flowed into the Doce River and dramatically affected fish diversity (Fernandes et al., 2016; Weber et al., 2020). These are just a few examples of how mine operations and failures negatively affect freshwater ecosystems, including large-scale fish kills and biodiversity losses. Despite recent catastrophes that expose the dangers of mining operations (e.g., Fernandes et al., 2016; Olden et al., 2019), many Neotropical nations have largely downplayed the negative and pervasive impacts of mining. This is certainly the case for Brazil, where mining is widespread and plans exist for expansion and changes in legislation favoring the mining sector (Meira et al., 2016; Congresso Nacional, 2020).
The science to inform mining policy in the Neotropical region is available in published journals, grey literature (often internal mining company reports), and the news media, yet it has not been synthesized to facilitate an understanding of mining impacts on the Neotropical ichthyofauna. To address this knowledge gap, we systematically reviewed current knowledge regarding the main negative impacts of mining on Neotropical freshwater fishes. Several types of mining have related consequences. For example, gold mining results in input of toxic metals (e.g., Malm, 1998), which also occurs with petroleum production (e.g., Baqué, Doyle, 2017). Thus, we list the main impacts of mining of crude oil, gold, iron, copper, and bauxite. We chose these ores because there is more available information of negative impacts related to them. Although the negative effects of mining can be pervasive across taxonomic groups (e.g., Callisto et al., 1998a; Brosse et al., 2011), in this review we explore the impacts that can arise from inputs of crude oil and heavy metals and other pollutants, sediment erosion and siltation, deforestation practices, and road construction on Neotropical freshwater fishes.
Main consequences and negative impacts on fishes
Mining is a necessary activity for human societies. We depend on petroleum for transporting people and commodities, for example, and metals are a key component of human civilizations. However, mining has also proven to cause countless negative environmental impacts (e.g., Callisto et al., 1998a,b; Brosse et al., 2011; Hughes et al., 2016; Marrugo-Negrete et al., 2018; Albuquerque et al., 2020) that can be avoided or minimized. In this section, we review how different mining activities lead to detrimental impacts on Neotropical freshwater fishes.
Input of crude oil. Oil extraction and transportation are major economic activities, and oil spills resulting from poor mining practices are not uncommon (e.g., Sebastián, Hurtig, 2004; Hughes et al., 2016). Crude oil spills in Neotropical waterbodies have occurred repeatedly during or after the extraction (in the blocks) or in the transport via pipelines, latter associated with human actions (e.g., vandalism – including terrorism, poor maintenance) or environmental sources (i.e., natural catastrophes). In the Peruvian Amazon alone, more than 400 leaks were recorded over 19 years (León, Zúñiga, 2020), and many hundreds more occurred but were not reported or even discovered. The scenario is more complicated if we consider other countries (e.g., Ecuador) that extract oil in the region. Most instances of oil spills are poorly documented in the scientific literature, and effects on fish assemblages are substantially underreported. In addition to accidental spill events, crude oil was also intentionally released into ecosystems, likely reaching freshwater ones (Kimerling, 2006).
The environmental implications of oil spills on Neotropical freshwater fishes remain poorly documented (e.g., Fraser, 2016). However, in the Amazon basin, oil spills are frequent, resulting in dramatic impacts to fish assemblages (Fig. 1). Several oil spills have caused fish mortality (see Tab. 1) and have led to the accumulation of crude oil in organisms and in the freshwater environments (e.g., Fig. 1). The Marañón River basin, an important region for fishing (Coomes et al., 2010), has been the recipient of successive crude oil spills that have killed many fishes (Tab. 1).
The negative impacts of oil spills directly or indirectly related to petroleum activities extend beyond the Amazon River basin. A highly damaging case occurred in Brazil, where a crude oil spill was dumped in a stream, later reached the Barigui River, and flowed to the Iguaçu River (South Brazil), resulting in massive mortality (Tab. 1; see also Ostrensky et al., 2003). The Iguaçu River is the main waterbody of the Iguaçu River basin, where more than 50% of fish species are endemic (Zawadzki et al., 1999). Thus, oil spills in these Neotropical ecosystems (e.g., Iguaçu, Amazon basins) have probably impacted several endemic fish species, including those not described yet. Even in cases where there is no clear evidence of impacts on fish diversity (e.g., in Tab. 1), they possibly occurred at some level. For example, Short (2003) argued that oil contains the life-damaging chemicals “polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH)”, and that these compounds negatively affect salmonid embryogenesis. In general, exposure to crude oil can have different non-lethal effect, such as impairing swimming capacity, and can result in malformations (Carls et al., 1999). Studies also show that fish exposed to petroleum have become more susceptible to parasitism (Khan, 1990) and eye and cardiac dysfunctions (Cherr et al., 2017; Magnuson et al., 2020). Thus, oil spills will not always have immediately visible effects on fishes, but they can affect individuals and populations for a long time.
|Waterbodies||Country||Year of spill||Amount (liters)||Negative impacts on fish diversity|
|Andean River to Lake Titicaca||Bolivia||2000||~4,734,642||Yes|
|Stream to the Barigui and after to the Iguaçu River||Brazil||2000||~4,000,000||Yes|
|Catatumbo River to Lake Maracaibo||Colombia (effects in Venezuela)||2001||~2,861,771||Possibly|
|Catatumbo River to Lake Maracaibo||Colombia (effects in Venezuela)||2012||Unknown||Yes|
|Guarapiche River||Venezuela||2012||~10,175,204 to ~19,078,508||Yes|
|Coca River||Ecuador (effects in Peru)||2013||~1,825,174||Possibly|
|Lake – Unknown name||Peru||2014||Unknown||Yes|
|A tributary of the Marañón River basin||Peru||2014||~254,380||Yes|
|Stream – Unknown name||Peru||2014||Unknown||Yes|
|Stream – Unknown name||Brazil||2015||~600||Possibly|
|Chiriaco and Morona Rivers – 1||Peru||2016||~476,962||Possibly|
|Chiriaco and Morona Rivers – 2||Peru||2016||Unknown||Possibly|
|Stream – Unknown name||Peru||2016||Unknown||Possibly|
|Tepeyac stream and Coatzacoalcos River||Mexico||2018||Unknown||Yes|
|Streams, Sogamoso and Magdalena Rivers||Colombia||2018||~79,494 to ~87,443||Yes|
|Coca and Napo Rivers||Ecuador (effects in Peru)||2020||~2,384,809||Yes|
|Godineau River||Trinidad and Tobago||2020||Unknown||Possibly|
Negative impacts on fishes may substantially perturb food webs (Azevedo-Santos et al., 2016) and diminish environmental services (e.g., fish as food). For example, traditional human communities have reported that water bodies affected by crude oil experienced a notable decline in fish diversity (Sebastián, Hurtig, 2004), with subsequent but unstudied impacts on fishery production. As fishes disperse seeds (Correa et al., 2007; Reys et al., 2009), this is, for instance, another affected service. In fact, all consequences (e.g., input of metals,chlorides, cyanides, roads) of different mining activities reported here will affect food webs and ecosystem services.
Another common problem, especially in the Amazon basin, is oil extraction in headwater areas (Finer et al., 2008), implying that local spills can often extend downstream to other sites (Azevedo-Santos et al., 2016, 2019), pervasively affecting fish diversity and fisheries activities. This effect was recently observed in the Magdalena River in Colombia and in other Neotropical regions (Tab. 1).
FIGURE 1 | Dead fishes (characiforms, cichliforms, and siluriforms) after crude oil spilled in waterbody of the Amazon River basin. Credits to Barbara Fraser.
After the input of massive amounts of a substance, especially in flowing waters, recovering the substance is difficult. In this case, petroleum, in addition to reaching downstream areas, remains present in aquatic organisms and sediment (e.g., Fig. 1); this persistence was verified after the oil spill resulting from the Deepwater Horizon accident (Liu, Liu, 2013). Therefore, freshwater fish from Amazonia and other Neotropical regions where leaks have occurred can be exposed to the negative effects of crude oil for months or years.
Input of metals. Different metals associated with mining operations can leach directly into watersheds; the volume and rate of the leaching are often unknown. Activities involved in the extraction of crude oil, gold, iron, and copper cause input of minerals into waterbodies. Some minerals have contaminated or otherwise affected Neotropical freshwater fishes (Tab. 2) – including in Amazonian systems, where small-scale mining activities, many of them illegal, are widespread. The sources of minerals in freshwater ecosystems are well known and include the failure of tailings disposal facilities and the chronic release of minerals during mining operations.
Many mines have tailings disposal facilities (hereafter TDFs; see fig. 1 in Salvador et al., 2020) that are used when large volumes of metal ores are mined (Tab. 3). The tailings may include finely ground rock (silt, powder), metals (e.g., cadmium), and processing chemicals and slimes, some of which are toxic (e.g., cyanides). These facilities are vulnerable to various disruptions (Nazareno, Vitule, 2016). When they collapse, TDFs release huge masses of toxic tailings, silt, and very turbid water into downstream environments (e.g., streams, rivers, floodplains, estuaries), causing extensive environmental changes. Numerous collapses of TDFs are reported in Neotropical countries (e.g., Wise, 2020), some of which have been highly publicized in popular media – especially when people died. However, for many of these cases little is known about the true magnitude of the impact of the accident on fishes, especially for events occurring before the 1990s.
In Brazil, TDF failures have resulted in catastrophic biodiversity losses in important rivers. The best-known examples, because of their social impacts and biodiversity losses, were the ruptures of the Fundão and Brumadinho TDFs, both in the State of Minas Gerais (Lambertz, Dergam, 2015; Fernandes et al., 2016; Cionek et al., 2019). In the case of Fundão, the refuse flowed downstream in the Doce River, in the southeastern part of Brazil (Carmo et al., 2017). This single event may have killed endemic, threatened, and undescribed fish species (Fernandes et al., 2016). The Brumadinho TDF rupture affected another major waterbody, the Paraopeba River, in the São Francisco River basin (Cionek et al., 2019), killing a huge number of fish. These events immediately changed limnological conditions and imported high levels of toxic mud (i.e., metals were present; Fernandes et al., 2016), impacting fishes. For example, the fish Danio rerio (Hamilton, 1822), exposed to the water from an affected waterbody (i.e., Paraopeba River), manifested high percentages of dead embryos or specimens with abnormalities (Thompson et al., 2020). In both cases, metals but also mud and other compounds in the TDF may have played a central role in the massive fish kill (Fernandes et al., 2016; Vergilio et al., 2020). Despite these catastrophes, Brazil currently has > 500 TDFs (Nazareno, Vitule, 2016), which may substantially damage ecosystems and fish diversity if – or when – they fail.
Metal inputs into Neotropical freshwaters also occur via other routes, including the deliberate or accidental release of effluents into waterbodies. Many rivers of different nations (e.g., Bolivia, Ecuador, French Guiana, Peru) probably received mercury during gold mining (Tab. 2), including many watercourses in the Amazon basin. Most contamination is likely related to illegal mining, a frequent activity in many Neotropical nations. These actions have led to extensive contamination, with likely lethal and sub-lethal effects on organisms. For instance, considerable research points to mercury in fish and in the environment of many Amazon rivers (Tab. 2). Mercury can cause genetic modification (Porto et al., 2005), brain disorders (Peterson et al., 2007), and other toxic effects (Monteiro et al., 2017). Furthermore, because it is a toxic metal with bioaccumulation potential (Morel et al., 1998), mercury usually accumulates and, through the trophic transfer, may harm entire food webs, from smaller fish to top predators (e.g., Salminus spp., Hoplias spp., Cichla spp., Caiman crocodilus), including large mammals (e.g., Trichechus inunguis) and humans (Malm, 1998).
TABLE 2 | Neotropical freshwater fishes affected by metals in regions with records of mining activities (Methods in S2).
|Copper||Various metals||João Dias Stream||Brazil||Abril et al. (2018a,b)|
|Gold||Mercury||Tributaries of the Amazon basin||Brazil||Akagi et al. (1995)|
|Gold||Mercury||Magdalena River||Colombia||Alvarez et al. (2012)|
|Gold||Mercury||Piracicaba River||Brazil||Arantes et al. (2009)|
|Gold||Mercury||Paraíba do Sul River||Brazil||Azevedo et al. (2017)|
|Gold||Mercury||Madeira River||Brazil||Bastos et al. (2006, 2015); Bataglioli et al. (2019)|
|Gold||Mercury||Tartarugalzinho River basin||Brazil||Bidone et al. (1997a)|
|Gold||Mercury||Tapajós River||Brazil||Bidone et al. (1997b)|
|Gold||Mercury||Sinnamary River basin||French Guiana||Boudou et al. (2005)|
|Gold||Mercury||Tapajós River basin||Brazil||Brabo et al. (2000)|
|Gold||Mercury||Madeira River||Brazil||Dórea et al. (1998); Braga et al. (2015)|
|Gold||Mercury||Tapajós River basin||Brazil||Castilhos et al. (1998); Faial et al. (2015)|
|Gold||Mercury||Petit-Saut reservoir (Sinnamary River basin)||French Guiana||Durrieu et al. (2005)|
|Gold||Mercury||Madre de Dios River basin||Peru||Feingold et al. (2020)|
|Gold||Mercury||Paraguay River||Brazil||Ferreira et al. (2017)|
|Gold||Mercury||Upper Maroni River||French Guiana||Fréry et al. (2001)|
|Gold||Mercury||Lake Titicaca||Peru||Gammons et al. (2006)|
|Gold||Mercury||Several waterbodies||French Guiana||Gentès et al. (2019)|
|Gold||Mercury||Teles Pires River and Cristalino River||Brazil||Hacon et al. (2000)|
|Gold||Mercury||Paraguay River basin||Brazil||Hylander et al. (2000)|
|Gold||Mercury||Rivers of Amazon basin||Brazil||Kehrig, Malm (1999)|
|Gold||Mercury||Paraguay River basin||Brazil||Leady, Gottgens (2001)|
|Gold||Mercury||Piriá River and Grande Lake||Brazil||Lima et al. (2005)|
|Gold||Various metals||Cassiporé River basin||Brazil||Lima et al. (2015)|
|Gold||Mercury||Tapajós River basin||Brazil||Malm et al. (1995); Lino et al. (2019)|
|Gold||Mercury||Several tributaries of Amazon basin||Brazil||Malm (1998)|
|Gold||Mercury||Cauca and San Jorge River basins||Colombia||Marrugo-Negrete et al. (2018)|
|Gold||Mercury||Malinowski River||Peru||Martinez et al. (2018)|
|Gold||Mercury||French Guiana rivers||French Guiana||Maury-Brachet et al. (2020)|
|Gold||Mercury||Lake Managua||Nicaragua||McCrary et al. (2006)|
|Gold||Mercury||Coastal rivers||Suriname||Mol et al. (2001)|
|Gold||Mercury||Rivers of Cuyuní River basin||Venezuela||Nico, Taphorn (1994)|
|Gold||Mercury||Magdalena River||Colombia||Olivero, Solano (1998)|
|Gold||Mercury||Atrato River||Colombia||Palacios-Torres et al. (2018)|
|Gold||Various metals||Atrato River||Colombia||Palacios-Torres et al. (2020)|
|Gold||Mercury||Coastal rivers||Brazil||Palheta, Taylor (1995)|
|Gold||Mercury||Madeira and Paraíba do Sul River basins||Brazil||Pfeiffer et al. (1989); Pfeiffer et al. (1991)|
|Gold||Mercury||Tucuruí Reservoir and Moju River||Brazil||Porvari (1995)|
|Gold||Mercury||Iténez River||Bolivia||Pouilly et al. (2012, 2013)|
|Gold||Mercury||Mutum-Paraná and Madeira Rivers||Brazil||Reuther (1994)|
|Gold||Mercury||Tapajós River||Brazil||Santos et al. (2000, 2002)|
|Gold||Mercury||Solimões River basin||Brazil||Silva, Lima (2020)|
|Gold||Mercury||Solimões River||Brazil||Silva et al. (2019)|
|Gold||Mercury||Madeira River||Brazil||Soares et al. (2018)|
|Gold||Mercury||Bacajá River||Brazil||Souza-Araujo et al. (2016)|
|Gold||Mercury||Puyango River basin||Ecuador||Tarras-Wahlberg et al. (2001)|
|Gold||Mercury||Tapajós River basin||Brazil||Uryu et al. (2001)|
|Iron||Various metals||Doce River||Brazil||Fernandes et al. (2016); Ferreira et al. (2020); Macêdo et al. (2020); Weber et al. (2020)|
|Iron||Various metals||Paraopeba River||Brazil||Thompson et al. (2020); Vergilio et al. (2020)|
Another source of metal pollution, especially in the Amazon basin, is through oil extraction. In general, petroleum extraction involves the presence of water contaminated by heavy metals (Baqué, Doyle, 2017). Known as “produced water”, this refuse has been released directly into waterbodies (Ibáñez, 1997; see also next subsection), as has been recorded in rivers from Colombia (Avellaneda, 1990), Ecuador (Ibáñez, 1997), and Peru (Baqué, Doyle, 2017). It is likely that the same input occurs in other Neotropical countries with high oil extraction activity (e.g., Venezuela). According to León, Zúñiga (2020:39), in only two areas of oil production in the Amazon, “approximately 408 million barrels” were generated in a single year and likely reached nearby waterbodies. The impacts of this waste on fish are unclear, as they have not been adequately examined. It is known that in regions where this waste was released, fish assemblages were contaminated by “copper, lead, zinc and mercury” (Baqué, Doyle, 2017:61). Other reports indicate that aquatic life was devastated in the presence of this waste (Ibáñez, 1997). It is likely that part of these effects is related to the presence of metals in the water, but other substances (e.g, chloride) may also be involved.
As with spills of crude oil and other substances, the release of metals, especially in high quantities, permeates entire river systems and affects fishes in adjacent environments and downstream habitats. This process was well documented in the failure of the Mariana TDF, which first contaminated a small watercourse, then spread through the mainstem of the Doce River (Fernandes et al., 2016; Carmo et al., 2017) and reached estuarine and marine ecosystems (Andrades et al., 2020). In fact, the problem of propagation of disturbances from headwater to downstream pervades all consequences of mining activities, including input of chemicals, deforestation, erosion and siltation, and roads, because these disturbances may occur in the upper sections of the watershed.
TABLE 3 | Major tailings disposal facilities (TDFs) that collapsed – with reports of effects on Neotropical freshwater fishes (Methods in S3).
|Mining||Decade of collapse||River affected (country)||References|
|Lead and zinc||1990||Pilcomayo River (Bolivia)||Garcia-Guinea, Harffy (1998)|
|Gold||1990||Omai River (Guyana)||Vick (1996)|
|Bauxite||2000||Murucupi River (Brazil)||Silva et al. (2012)|
|Iron||2010||Doce River (Brazil)||Fernandes et al. (2016)|
|Iron||2010||Paraopeba River (Brazil)||Cionek et al. (2019); Thompson et al. (2020);|
Vergilio et al. (2020)
Input of cyanides. Gold mining activities in different Neotropical countries, for example, Argentina, Costa Rica, French Guiana, Guatemala, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, and Suriname, have been reported to use cyanide. In the Neotropical region, cyanide is used in both legal and/or illegal mining activities. For instance, in Minas Gerais (Brazil), the Mina do Engenho had dams with cyanide (S4). An example of the illegal use is the case of Costa Rica, in Central America. In this country, in 2019, an enforcement operation seized more than two tons of the product in an illegal mining area (S5).
When this pollutant reaches a water body – owing to the rupture of dams, rain, deliberate disposal, or other reasons – freshwater fishes are affected (Tab. 4). The main problem is that effluents containing the substance often end up in waterbodies (Caheté, 1998) – despite few scientific reports documenting occurrences. For example, a tributary of the Jáchal River basin in Argentina was contaminated by cyanide after a spill, but the effects on fish are still unclear. Other examples occurred in Mexico, where high cyanide concentrations reached the Piaxtla River and killed several immature fish (Tab. 4), and Honduras, where successive accidents introduced cyanide into the Lara River; in the latter case, there was a strong negative impact on the ichthyofauna (Tab. 4). These kills may occur for different reasons, including difficulty in breathing owing to the presence of the substance (Eisler, 1991).
Cyanides may affect fishes in different ways. As argued by Eisler (1991:27), “(…) adverse effects of cyanide on fish include delayed mortality, pathology, impaired swimming ability and relative performance, susceptibility to predation, disrupted respiration, osmoregulatory disturbances, and altered growth patterns”. These problems may also have afflicted assemblages of the recorded disasters (Tab. 4). Immature forms may suffer the effects of these substances. For example, Leduc (1978) exposed Salmo salar Linnaeus, 1758, to hydrogen cyanide (HCN), a compound that may be also present in the mining. This author observed external changes in egg color and delayed hatching. For larvae, Leduc (1978) observed that the exposure to hydrogen cyanide resulted in morphological changes. This suggests that, in environments affected by cyanide, the recruitment of fish populations was also severely affected. In addition, the impact may propagate along the food chain, because cyanides also affect plants and macroinvertebrates (Eisler, 1991). Thus, the trophic structure of the entire community may be affected.
Input of chlorides, salts, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH). Produced waters extracted during oil extraction – in addition to metals (see subsection “Input of metals”) – also contain other substances (Neff et al., 2011;Baqué, Doyle, 2017; Yusta-García et al., 2017). As mentioned, produced waters were dumped into many tributaries in the Amazon basin; for instance, the Corrientes, Pucacungayacu, Manchari, and Tigre Rivers (Yusta-García et al., 2017; see figures in Baqué, Doyle, 2017:59 and 61). There are reports of losses of Neotropical fish diversity from produced water (Ibáñez, 1997). Chloride, high levels of salts, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH)(Neff et al., 2011) may play a role in the negative impacts on freshwater organisms. One impact may be due to the “chlorinity” effect in areas where produced waters are dumped (Kimerling, 2006:453). Ibáñez (1997) and Kimerling (2006) argued that this phenomenon may chemically block ecosystems and affect the routes used by the ichthyofauna during migration and spawning events. However, we emphasize that these effects (barriers) should be better evaluated.
The saline compounds, according to Neff et al. (2011), probably include sodium chloride (NaCl). Hintz, Relyea (2017) exposed rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum, 1792) to this substance. Among their results, the authors showed that, depending on the concentrations of sodium chloride, individual growth was negatively affected. Similarly, PAHis expected to be highly damaging to freshwater fishes in both the short and long terms (see subsection “Input of crude oil”).
Erosion and siltation. Mining activities (iron, bauxite, gold, and copper) cause erosion and/or siltation in nearby waterbodies (e.g., Lin, Caramaschi, 2005; Nascimento et al., 2012; Verbete, 2012; Wantzen, Mol, 2013; Lobo et al., 2016; Melo et al., 2018), and in some cases the sediment may be contaminated by metals and other pollutants (Lopes et al., 2019). The extraction of other ores, like crude oil, may play a role in erosion and siltation (especially through deforestation and roads). These processes can have direct or indirect negative effects on fish. Erosion and siltation affect fish physiology, such as gill functioning (Wantzen, Mol, 2013). Other impacts include reduced water quality, loss of environmental heterogeneity, and altered habitats for fish feeding, refuge, reproduction, and development (Mol, Ouboter, 2004; Wantzen, Mol, 2013), especially through impacts on substrate interstices, leaf pack sedimentation, and aquatic plants. In a study evaluating the effects of erosion from a gold mine in Suriname, Mol, Ouboter (2004) showed that mining increased water turbidity with eroded material released from the mine. In addition, they reported “low habitat diversity, and a fish community with reduced diversity, few young fishes, and many fishes adapted to low light” (Mol, Ouboter, 2004:210). Erosion also contributes to the entry of mercury present in soil into the aquatic ecosystem, causing fish contamination (Richard et al., 2000). Another important case of siltation occurred in a lake in the Brazilian Amazon. Bauxite mining effluents, which include clay, were deposited for a decade in Lake Batata, in the Trombetas River basin (Bozelli, 1994; Lin, Caramaschi, 2005), and likely caused effects on fish diversity (Lin, Caramaschi, 2005).
In general, additional research is needed to better elucidate the negative impacts of siltation resulting from different mining activities on Neotropical fishes. However, silting from other human activities (Tab. 5) may serve as a baseline to predict the impacts of silting from mining. Inputs of sediments into aquatic environments resulting from anthropogenic actions have been incorporated into species extinction risk assessments (ICMBio, 2018). For example, silting is among the negative impacts listed to justify the classification of Brycon vermelha Lima & Castro, 2000, an endemic Brazilian fish, as endangered on the Brazilian red list (Santos et al., 2018). We emphasize that sediments from mining may carry metals (Lopes et al., 2019), which further increases the likelihood of adverse effects on freshwater fishes.
Deforestation. Mining activities (crude oil, gold, iron, copper, and bauxite) are also responsible for expanding deforestation (Kimerling, 2006; Swenson et al., 2011; Sonter et al., 2017; Espejo et al., 2018; Melo et al., 2018; Dethier et al., 2019; Diringer et al., 2020), directly or indirectly. For example, after a global crisis in the 2000s that affected several economies, the value of gold increased and, consequently, deforestation increased also in several Neotropical countries (Alvarez-Berríos, Aide, 2015) – indicating a strong correlation between mining and removal of vegetation.
|Waterbodies||Country||Year of spill||Amount (liters)||Negative impacts on fish diversity|
|Omai and Essequibo Rivers||Guyana||1995||~1,230,258,830 to ~3,000,000,000||Yes|
|San Sebastián River||El Salvador||Unknown||Unknown||Possibly|
|Tributary of Velhas River||Brazil||2011||Unknown||Yes|
TABLE 5 | Examples of negative effects of siltation on Neotropical freshwater fishes (Methods in S7).
|Pasture||Decrease of the integrity of fish assemblages||Brazil||Casatti (2004)|
|Agriculture||Affect negatively the functional diversity||Brazil||Dala-Corte et al. (2016)|
|Mining||Decrease in fish diversity||Brazil||Lin, Caramaschi (2005)|
|Mining||Reduction of fish diversity||Suriname||Mol, Ouboter (2004)|
The negative impact of deforestation from other activities (e.g., conversion to pasture) on fish diversity is known (Tab. 6). However, negative effects of deforestation arising from mining require more research in Neotropical regions. In general, deforestation of riparian vegetation has resulted in strong changes in the ichthyofauna (e.g., Tab. 6). The negative effects include, for instance, changes in taxonomic and functional features (Casatti et al., 2012) and losses of species, especially those sensitive to impacts (Dala-Corte et al., 2016). These same effects – or perhaps worse, because of contamination by metals – may occur on fishes in areas deforested owing to mining activities.
Roads. Virtually all types of mining (including crude oil, gold, iron, copper, and bauxite) need roads to transport the extracted ores or inputs (e.g., cyanide).Therefore, the maintenance, rehabilitation, and construction of new roads are common processes in mining areas (Kimerling, 2006; Edwards et al., 2014). Construction of new roads is especially common in remote regions. For example, Texaco, the oil company, constructed long roads (> 600 km) in the Amazonian forest (Kimerling, 2006). New roads precipitate a sequence of disturbances from deforestation (e.g., Barber et al., 2014) to erosion process and silting (Kimerling, 2006), besides introducing barriers to fish dispersal in small waterbodies (Leitão et al., 2018). The reasons for road construction are varied (Edwards et al., 2014), but their impacts are similar. The most important aspect is that roads fuel mining and other activities, including illegal ones.
New roads cause direct deforestation and open opportunities for ancillary activities, such as logging, construction of settlements, and other types of occupation (Barber et al., 2014). In addition, they cause direct and indirect erosion (Smith et al., 2018). New roads also fragment aquatic habitats, and many studies (e.g., Belford, Gould, 1989; Mariano et al., 2012; Brejão et al., 2020) have demonstrated that road culverts hinder hinder the movement of fishes. For example, Makrakis et al. (2012) evaluated the negative impacts of culverts, showing that 90% of them seriously threat fish movements. Brejão et al. (2020), studying Amazonian streams, found that roads crossing these small waterbodies affected the distribution of ichthyofauna by fragmenting habitats. A case of roads constructed for mining that generated negative impacts on fishes was reported for the Amazon. Kimerling (2001:330) described how the company Occidental Petroleum constructed a road in the El Eden region, in Ecuador, that “blocked the migration of fish from a lake into seasonally flooded forest”.
Roads also directly or indirectly pollute aquatic ecosystems. For example, exploration for crude oil in Ecuadorian Amazonia resulted in roads coated with oil that, in turn, polluted several waterbodies with high fish diversity (Kimerling, 2006). Run-off may have generated several negative effects, lethal and non-lethal, on fishes (see subsection “Input of crude oil”). Another type of pollution may come from the usage of these roads for mining. An event that received prominence was the contamination of the Yaqui River, in Mexico (near the Neotropical limits), with cyanide (S9). The pollution occurred after an accident with a truck transporting the substance to a mine (S9). Cases like these are likely to occur frequently in the Neotropical region, but they are not reported to authorities and do not receive the attention of the media. Other types of pollution arising from roads are eutrophication processes (Smith et al., 2018), plastics (Windsor et al., 2019), and solid and liquid waste from traffic. These disturbances harm the aquatic biota.
A growing threat
Currently, political forces work to expand mining activities across Neotropical countries. In Brazil, particularly, plans are afoot to expand the activity across the country, especially in the Amazon, Southeast, and Northeast regions (Ferreira et al., 2014; Villén-Perez et al., 2017). The strong lobby of the mining sector has spurred revisions in Mining Code legislation (Meira-Neto, Neri, 2017). A direct result of this movement has been the creation of the National Mining Agency in 2017, which has increased the sector’s autonomy and political power against environmental restrictions. Moreover, the Brazilian Congress is currently analyzing bills that propose mining in protected areas and indigenous lands, in addition to a constitutional amendment that proposes simplifying the environmental licensing system (El Bizri et al., 2016; Villén-Perez et al., 2017; Congresso Nacional, 2020). Such simplification, if approved, will enable the construction/operation of large-scale projects, including mining, without the need for rigorous environmental assessments (Fearnside, 2016). The mining lobby strengthened after the election of President Jair Bolsonaro, who has defended a “development” agenda with little regard for the environment and sustainability (Azevedo-Santos et al., 2021; Thomaz et al., 2020; Pelicice, Castello, 2021) and with political and legal incentives for the agrarian and mining sectors (Campo-Silva, Peres, 2019). The president himself has expressed his desire to allow the exploration for mineral resources in protected areas and indigenous lands of the Amazon. Rather than these current activities, Brazil should play an important role in avoiding policies that erode the Neotropical ichthyofauna. This is because, based on recent publications on described species (ICMBio, 2018; Albert et al., 2020), we estimate that the country holds a little more than 50% of species richness of freshwater fishes of the Neotropics. Using other sources of information (ICMBio, 2018; Fricke, Eschmeyer, 2021), we suggest that Brazil harbors between 16 to 18% of the species richness of freshwater fishes of the planet. This is an extraordinarily high diversity for a single jurisdiction. This outsize role suggests that political action, for example, at the federal level to expand mining at any cost, can affect a considerable portion of the Neotropical freshwater fishes.
TABLE 6 | Examples of negative impacts of deforestation on Neotropical freshwater fishes (Methods in S8).
|Agriculture and pasture||Changes in density||Ecuador||Bojsen, Barriga (2002)|
|Pasture||“Negative threshold responses”||Brazil||Brejão et al. (2018)|
|Pasture and agriculture||Alterations in both taxonomic and functional features||Brazil||Casatti et al. (2012)|
|Pasture||Changes in species composition||Brazil||Costa et al. (2020)|
|Pasture and agriculture||Alterations in the size of fishes||Brazil||Ilha et al. (2018)|
|Agriculture||Increase of abundance of some species||Brazil||Ilha et al. (2019)|
|Agriculture||Change in functional composition||Brazil||Leitão et al. (2018)|
|Pasture and grassland||“Functional changes”||Brazil||Lobón-Cerviá et al. (2016)|
|Pasture||Changes in abundance||Costa Rica||Lorion, Kennedy (2009)|
|Pasture||Change in functional groups||Brazil||Teresa et al. (2015)|
|Pasture||Changes in richness and abundance||Brazil||Virgilio et al. (2018)|
The trend of expanded mining activity has been observed in many other countries of the Neotropical region (Hammond et al., 2013) and will complicate the current scenario. Small-scale mining is widespread in Neotropical nations (Harlow et al., 2019), and many mines are located within protected areas (Kamino et al., 2020). In addition, illegal activities are frequent in remote regions, for example, in parts of Amazonia. Currently, inspection and monitoring of mining activities have been insufficient, while fines and sanctions for environmental damage have rarely been paid (especially in large-scale catastrophes), and emergency, management, and environmental restoration plans have been negligent, precarious, or absent (Cionek et al., 2019; Salvador et al., 2020). Further weakening legislation will reduce environmental restrictions and fuel the expansion of the activity, including in protected areas, where more than 10,000 projects await authorization (Villén-Perez et al., 2017). One important concern is the political influence of the mining sector, because mining companies have traditionally financed political campaigns, which has fueled corruption (Meira-Neto, Neri, 2017).
As mining activities – together with hydroelectric power plans (Winemiller et al., 2016) and other human actions (Pelicice et al., 2017, 2021; Tófoli et al., 2017; Daga et al., 2020; Mezzaroba et al., 2021) – expand in different nations, impacts on Neotropical biodiversity will become increasingly prominent. The maintenance of freshwater fish diversity in the region will depend on policies that regulate mining activities so that their expansion is balanced with the protection of ecosystems and biodiversity.
The diversity of Neotropical fishes, together with their ecosystem services, have been affected in different ways by mining activities. The main negative impacts come from input of crude oil, contamination by metals and other pollutants, erosion, silting, deforestation, and road construction. Some consequences, especially crude oil spills and the rupture of tailing dams, have brutal and long-lasting negative impacts on aquatic ecosystems. Although impacts are undisputable, there is a clear need for more scientific research. The present review demonstrated that the number of studies is still relatively small, and some impacts remain largely uninvestigated. The unpredictable nature of accidents, in particular, makes it difficult to plan studies, indicating the need for continuous and long-term monitoring of the fish fauna, especially in large or risky mining operations. Experimental and field studies are needed to fill important gaps concerning the response of fish to different consequences of mining activities.
The fact that mining activities damage the fish fauna should guide Neotropical countries to review their mining plans to establish more rigorous regulations and to adopt measures to contain illegal developments. We emphasize that some activities cause acute impacts in particular conditions (i.e., TDS spills), whereas others affect the environment continuously (e.g., gold mining), making it difficult to mitigate their effects. This fact increases the need for advances in inspection and monitoring programs, especially in areas where impacts have been reported and where they are likely to occur.
We thank Barbara Fraser, for providing the Fig. 1. We are grateful to two anonymous reviewers and the editor for the suggestions that significantly improved this article. Fernando M. Pelicice, Marcelo F. G. Brito and Angelo A. Agostinho received research grants from CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico). Robert M. Hughes received a Fulbright Brasil grant.
Abril SIM, Costa PG, Bianchini A. Metal accumulation and expression of genes encoding for metallothionein and copper transporters in a chronically exposed wild population of the fish Hyphessobrycon luetkenii. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2018a; 211:25–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpc.2018.05.008
Abril SIM, Dalmolin C, Costa PG, Bianchini A. Expression of genes related to metal metabolism in the freshwater fish Hyphessobrycon luetkenii living in a historically contaminated area associated with copper mining. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2018b; 60:146–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2018.04.019
Akagi H, Malm O, Kinjo Y, Harada M, Branches FJ, Pfeiffer WC, Kato H. Methylmercury pollution in the Amazon, Brazil. Sci Total Environ. 1995; 175(2):85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(95)04905-3
Albert JS, Tagliacollo VA, Dagosta F. Diversification of Neotropical freshwater fishes. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2020; 51:27–53. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-011620-031032
Albuquerque FEA, Minervino AHH, Miranda M, Herrero-Latorre C, Júnior RAB, Oliveira FLC et al. Toxic and essential trace element concentrations in the freshwater shrimp Macrobrachium amazonicum in the Lower Amazon, Brazil. J Food Compos Anal. 2020; 86:103361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2019.103361
Alvarez S, Kolok AS, Jimenez LF, Granados C, Palacio JA. Mercury concentrations in muscle and liver tissue of fish from marshes along the Magdalena River, Colombia. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2012; 89(4):836–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-012-0782-9
Alvarez-Berríos NL, Aide TM. Global demand for gold is another threat for tropical forests. Environ Res Lett. 2015; 10(1):029501. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/1/014006
Alves RRN, Rosa IL. From cnidarians to mammals: The use of animals as remedies in fishing communities in NE Brazil. J Ethnopharmacol. 2006; 107(2):259–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2006.03.007
Andrades R, Guabiroba HC, Hora MSC, Martins RF, Rodrigues VLA, Vilar CC et al. Early evidences of niche shifts in estuarine fishes following one of the world’s largest mining dam disasters. Mar Pollut Bull. 2020; 154:111073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111073
Arantes IA, Pinto MTC, Mangabeira PA, Grenier-Loustalot MF, Veado MARV, Oliveira AH. Mercury concentration in fish from Piracicaba River (Minas Gerais, Brazil). Environ Monit Assess. 2009; 156(1–4):119–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0468-2
Avellaneda A. Petróleo e impacto ambiental en Colombia. Revista de la Universidad Nacional. 1990; 6(24):21–28.
Azevedo LS, Almeida MG, Bastos WR, Suzuki MS, Recktenvald MCNN, Bastos MTS et al. Organotropism of methylmercury in fish of the southeastern of Brazil. Chemosphere. 2017; 185:746–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.07.081
Azevedo-Santos VM, Garcia-Ayala JR, Fearnside PM, Esteves FA, Pelicice FM, Laurance WF et al. Amazon aquatic biodiversity imperiled by oil spills. Biodivers Conserv. 2016; 25:2831–834. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1192-9
Azevedo-Santos VM, Frederico RG, Fagundes CK, Pompeu PS, Pelicice FM, Padial AA et al. Protected areas: A focus on Brazilian freshwater biodiversity. Divers Distrib. 2019; 25(3):442–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12871
Azevedo-Santos VM, Rodrigues-Filho JL, Fearnside PM, Lovejoy TE, Brito MFG. Conservation of Brazilian freshwater biodiversity: Thinking about the next 10 years and beyond. Biodivers Conserv. 2021; 30:235–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-020-02076-5
Baqué YC, Doyle C. El daño no se olvida. Impactos socioambientales en territorios de pueblos indígenas de la Amazonía norperuana afectados por las operaciones de la empresa Pluspetrol. Perú: Centro de Políticas Públicas y Derechos Humanos; 2017.
Barber CP, Cochrane MA, Souza CM, Laurance WF. Roads, deforestation, and the mitigating effect of protected areas in the Amazon. Biol Conserv. 2014; 177:203–09. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.07.004
Bastos WR, Dórea JG, Bernardi JVE, Lauthartte LC, Mussy MH, Lacerda LD et al. Mercury in fish of the Madeira River (temporal and spatial assessment), Brazilian Amazon. Environ Res.2015; 140:191–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2015.03.029
Bastos WR, Gomes JPO, Oliveira RC, Almeida R, Nascimento EL, Bernardi JVE et al. Mercury in the environment and riverside population in the Madeira River Basin, Amazon, Brazil. Sci Total Environ. 2006; 368(1):344–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.09.048
Bataglioli IC, Vieira JCS, Queiroz JV, Fernandes MS, Bittarello AC, Braga CP et al. Physiological and functional aspects of metal binding protein associated with mercury in the liver tissue of pirarucu (Arapaima gigas) from the Brazilian Amazon. Chemosphere. 2019; 236:124320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.07.051
Belford DA, Gould WR. An evaluation of trout passage through six highway culverts in Montana. N Am J Fish Manag. 1989; 9(4):437–45. Bidone ED, Castilhos ZC, Santos TJS, Souza TD, Lacerda LD. Fish contamination and human exposure to mercury in Tartarugalzinho River, Amapa State, Northern Amazon, Brazil. A screening approach. Water Air Soil Pollut.1997a; 97(1–2):9–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02409640
Bidone ED, Castilhos ZC, De Souza TC, Lacerda LD. Fish contamination and human exposure to mercury in the Tapajós River Basin, Pará State, Amazon, Brazil: a screening approach. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 1997b; 59(2):194–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001289900464
El Bizri HR, Macedo JCB, Paglia AP, Morcatty TQ. Mining undermining Brazil’s environment. Science. 2016; 353(6296):228. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aag1111
Bojsen BH, Barriga R. Effects of deforestation on fish community structure in Ecuadorian Amazon streams. Freshw Biol. 2002; 47(11):2246–260. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00956.x
Boudou A, Maury-Brachet R, Coquery M, Durrieu G, Cossa D. Synergic effect of gold mining and damming on mercury contamination in fish. Environ Sci Technol.2005; 39(8):2448–454. https://doi.org/10.1021/es049149r
Bozelli RL. Zooplankton community density in relation to water level fluctuations and inorganic turbidity in an Amazonian lake, “Lago Batata”, State of Pará, Brazil. Amazoniana. 1994;13(1/2):17–32.
Brabo ES, Oliveira Santos E, Jesus IM, Mascarenhas AFS, de Freitas Faial K. Mercury contamination of fish and exposures of an indigenous community in Para state, Brazil. Environ Res.2000; 84(3):197–203. https://doi.org/10.1006/enrs.2000.4114
Braga CP, Bittarello AC, Padilha CCF, Leite AL, Moraes PM, Buzalaf MAR et al. Mercury fractionation in dourada (Brachyplatystoma rousseauxii) of the Madeira River in Brazil using metalloproteomic strategies. Talanta. 2015; 132:239–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2014.09.021
Brejão GL, Hoeinghaus DJ, Pérez-Mayorga MA, Ferraz SFB, Casatti L. Threshold responses of Amazonian stream fishes to timing and extent of deforestation. Conserv Biol. 2018; 32(4):860–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13061
Brejão GL, Teresa FB, Gerhard P. When roads cross streams: fish assemblage responses to fluvial fragmentation in lowland Amazonian streams. Neotrop Ichthyol. 2020; 18(3):e200031. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0224-2020-0031
Brosse S, Grenouillet GI, Gevrey M, Khazraie K, Tudesque L. Small-scale gold mining erodes fish assemblage structure in small neotropical streams. Biodivers Conserv. 2011; 20:1013–026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-011-0011-6
Caheté FLS. A extração de ouro na Amazônia e suas implicações para o meio ambiente. Novos Cad do Naea. 1998; 1(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.5801/ncn.v1i2.14
Callisto M, Esteves FA, Gonçalves JJF, Fonseca JJL. Benthic macroinvertebrates as indicators of ecological fragility of small rivers (“igarapés”) in a bauxite mining region of Brazilian Amazonia.Amazoniana. 1998a; 15(1/2):1–9. http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0004-916E-D
Callisto M, Esteves FA, Gonçalves JJF, Leal JJF. Impact of bauxite tailing on the distribution of benthic macrofauna in a small river (“igarapé”) in Central Amazonia, Brazil. J Kans Entomol Soc.1998b; 71(4):447–55. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25085861
Campo-Silva JV, Peres CA. Brazil’s policies stuck in the mud. Science. 2019; 363(6431):1046. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw8293
Carls MG, Rice SD, Hose JE. Sensitivity of fish embryos to weathered crude oil: Part I. Low-level exposure during incubation causes malformations, genetic damage, and mortality in larval Pacific herring (Clupea pallasi). Environ Toxicol Chem. 1999; 18(3):481–93.
Carmo FF, Kamino LHY, Junior RT, Campos IC, Carmo FF, Silvino G et al. Fundão tailings dam failures: the environment tragedy of the largest technological disaster of Brazilian mining in global context. Perspect Ecol Conserv. 2017; 15(3):145–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2017.06.002
Casatti L. Ichthyofauna of two streams (silted and reference) in the upper Paraná River basin, southeastern Brazil. Braz J Biol. 2004; 64(4):757–65. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-69842004000500004
Casatti L, Teresa FB, Gonçalves-Souza T, Bessa E, Manzotti AR, Gonçalves CS, Zeni JO. From forests to cattail: how does the riparian zone influence stream fish? Neotrop Ichthyol. 2012; 10(1):205–14. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-62252012000100020
Castilhos ZC, Bidone ED, Lacerda LD. Increase of the background human exposure to mercury through fish consumption due to gold mining at the Tapajós River region, Pará State, Amazon. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol.1998; 61(2):202–09. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001289900749
Castro RMC, Polaz CNM. Small-sized fish: the largest and most threatened portion of the megadiverse neotropical freshwater fish fauna. Biota Neotrop. 2020; 20(1):e20180683. https://doi.org/10.1590/1676-0611-bn-2018-0683
Cherr GN, Fairbairn E, Whitehead A. Impacts of petroleum-derived pollutants on fish development. Annu Rev Anim Biosci. 2017; 5:185–203. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-animal-022516-022928
Cionek VM, Alves GHZ, Tófoli RM, Rodrigues-Filho JL, Dias RM. Brazil in the mud again: lessons not learned from Mariana dam collapse. Biodivers Conserv. 2019; 28:1935–938. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-019-01762-3
Congresso Nacional. PL 191/2020 [Internet]. Brasília, DF, Brazil: Câmara dos Deputados; 2020. Available from: https://www.camara.leg.br/proposicoesWeb/fichadetramitacao?idProposicao=2236765
Coomes OT, Takasaki Y, Abizaid C, Barham BL. Floodplain fisheries as natural insurance for the rural poor in tropical forest environments: evidence from Amazonia. Fish Manag Ecol. 2010; 17(6):513–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2400.2010.00750.x
Correa SB, Winemiller KO, López-Férnandez H, Galetti M. Evolutionary perspectives on seed consumption and dispersal by fishes. Bioscience. 2007; 57(9):748–56. https://doi.org/10.1641/B570907
Costa ID, Petry AC, Mazzoni R. Fish assemblages respond to forest cover in small Amazonian basins. Limnologica. 2020; 81:125757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.limno.2020.125757
Daga VS, Azevedo-Santos VM, Pelicice FM, Fearnside FM, Perbiche-Neves G, Paschoal LRP et al. Water diversion in Brazil threatens biodiversity. Ambio. 2020; 49:165–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01189-8
Dala-Corte RB, Giam X, Olden JD, Becker FG, Guimarães TF, Melo AS. Revealing the pathways by which agricultural land-use affects stream fish communities in South Brazilian grasslands. Freshw Biol. 2016; 61(11):1921–934. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12825
Dethier EN, Sartain SL, Lutz DA. Heightened levels and seasonal inversion of riverine suspended sediment in a tropical biodiversity hotspot due to artisanal gold mining. PNAS. 2019; 116(48):23936–941. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1907842116
Diringer SE, Berky AJ, Marani M, Ortiz EJ, Karatum O, Plata DL et al. Deforestation due to artisanal and small-scale gold mining exacerbates soil and mercury mobilization in Madre de Dios, Peru. Environ Sci Technol. 2020; 54(1):286–96. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b06620
Dórea JG, Moreira MB, East G, Barbosa AC. Selenium and mercury concentrations in some fish species of the Madeira River, Amazon Basin, Brazil. Biol Trace Elem Res.1998; 65(3):211–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02789097
Durrieu G, Maury-Brachet R, Boudou A. Goldmining and mercury contamination of the piscivorous fish Hoplias aimara in French Guiana (Amazon basin). Ecotox Environ Safe. 2005; 60(3):315–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2004.05.004
Edwards DP, Sloan S, Weng L, Dirks P, Sayer J, Laurance WF. Mining and the African Environment. Conserv Lett. 2014; 7(3):302–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12076
Eisler R. Cyanide hazards to fish, wildlife, and invertebrates: a synoptic review. Laurel, MD: US Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service; 1991.
Espejo JC, Messinger M, Román-Dañobeytia F, Ascorra C, Fernandez LE, Silman M. Deforestation and forest degradation due to gold mining in the Peruvian Amazon: a 34-year perspective. Remote Sens. 2018; 10(12):1903. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10121903
Faial K, Deus R, Deus S, Neves R, Jesus I, Santos E, Alves CN, Brasil D. Mercury levels assessment in hair of riverside inhabitants of the Tapajós River, Pará State, Amazon, Brazil: Fish consumption as a possible route of exposure. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2015; 30:66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtemb.2014.10.009
Fearnside PM. Brazilian politics threaten environmental policies. Science. 2016; 353(6301):746–48. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aag0254
Feingold BJ, Berky A, Hsu-Kim H, Jurado ER, Pan WK. Population-based dietary exposure to mercury through fish consumption in the Southern Peruvian Amazon. Environ Res. 2020; 183:108720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.108720
Fernandes GW, Goulart FF, Ranieri BD, Coelho MS, Dales K, Boesche N et al. Deep into the mud: ecological and socio-economic impacts of the dam breach in Mariana, Brazil. Nat Conserv. 2016; 14(2):35–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ncon.2016.10.003
Ferraris CJ, Jr. Family Arapaimatidae. In: Reis RE, Kullander SO, Ferraris CJ, Jr., editors. Check list of the freshwater fishes of South and Central America. Porto Alegre: Edipucrs; 2003. p.31.
Ferreira J, Aragão LEOC, Barlow J, Barreto P, Berenguer E, Bustamante M et al. Brazil’s environmental leadership at risk. Science. 2014; 346(6210):706–07. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1260194
Ferreira CMA, Egler SG, Yallouz AV, Ignácio ÁRA. Semiquantitative determination of total mercury in Pygocentrus nattereri Kner, 1858 and sediment at the plateau of Upper Paraguai River, Brazil. Chemosphere. 2017; 174:604–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.01.059
Ferreira FF, Freitas MBD, Szinwelski N, Vicente N, Medeiros LCC, Schaefer CEGR et al. Impacts of the Samarco tailing dam collapse on metals and arsenic concentration in freshwater fish muscle from Doce River, Southeastern Brazil. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2020; 16(5):622–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4289
Finer M, Jenkins CN, Pimm SL, Keane B, Ross C. Oil and gas projects in the western Amazon: threats to wilderness, biodiversity, and indigenous peoples. PLoS ONE. 2008; 3(8):e2932. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002932
Fraser B. Oil in the forest. Science. 2016; 353(6300):641–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.353.6300.641
Fréry N, Maury-Brachet R, Maillot E, Deheeger M, De Merona B, Boudou A. Gold-mining activities and mercury contamination of native Amerindian communities in French Guiana: key role of fish in dietary uptake. Environ Health Perspect.2001; 109(5):449–56. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.109-1240303
Fricke R, Eschmeyer WN, Van der Laan R. Eschmeyer’s catalog of fishes: genera, species, references [Internet]. San Francisco: California Academy of Science; 2021. Available from: https://www.calacademy.org/scientists/projects/eschmeyers-catalog-of-fishes
Gammons CH, Slotton DG, Gerbrandt B, Weight W, Young CA, McNearny RL et al. Mercury concentrations of fish, river water, and sediment in the Río Ramis-Lake Titicaca watershed, Peru. Sci Total Environ.2006; 368(2-3):637–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.09.076
Garcia-Guinea J, Harffy M. Bolivian mining pollution: past, present and future. Ambio. 1998; 27:251–53
Gentès S, Coquery M, Vigouroux R, Hanquiez V, Allard L, Maury-Brachet R. Application of the European Water Framework Directive: Identification of reference sites and bioindicator fish species for mercury in tropical freshwater ecosystems (French Guiana). Ecol Indic. 2019; 106:105468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105468
Hacon S, Yokoo E, Valente J, Campos RC, Da Silva VA, De Menezes ACC et al. Exposure to mercury in pregnant women from Alta Floresta – Amazon Basin, Brazil. Environ Res.2000; 84(3):204–10. https://doi.org/10.1006/enrs.2000.4115
Hammond DS, Rosales J, Ouboter PE. Managing the freshwater impacts of surface mining in Latin America. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank; 2013.
Harlow DE, Hurley K, Fox A, Vargas-Guerra A, Gibson J. Small-scale & artisanal mining impacts on biodiversity in Latin America. Washington, DC: The Cadmus Group and USAID; 2019.
Hintz WD, Relyea RA. Impacts of road deicing salts on the early-life growth and development of a stream salmonid: salt type matters. Environ Pollut. 2017; 223:409–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.01.040
Hughes RM, Amezcua F, Chambers DM, Daniel WM, Franks JS, Franzin W et al. AFS position paper and policy on mining and fossil fuel extraction. Fisheries. 2016; 41(1):12–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/03632415.2016.1121742
Hylander LD, Pinto FN, Guimaraes JR, Meili M, Oliveira LJ, Silva EDC. Fish mercury concentration in the Alto Pantanal, Brazil: influence of season and water parameters. Sci Total Environ. 2000; 261(1–3):9–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(00)00591-X
Ibáñez LP. Efectos devastadores de las multinacionales del petroleo en la Amazonia Ecuatoriana. Africa América Latina, cuadernos: Revista de análisis sur-norte para una cooperación solidaria. 1997; 26:77–82. Available from: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=2310881
ICMBio. Livro Vermelho da Fauna Brasileira Ameaçada de Extinção: Volume VI – Peixes [Internet]. Brasília, DF: ICMBio/MMA; 2018. Available from: http://www.icmbio.gov.br/portal/component/content/article/10187
Ilha P, Schiesari L, Yanagawa FI, Jankowski K, Navas CA. Deforestation and stream warming affect body size of Amazonian fishes. PLoS ONE. 2018; 13(5):e0196560. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196560
Ilha P, Rosso S, Schiesari L. Effects of deforestation on headwater stream fish assemblages in the Upper Xingu River Basin, Southeastern Amazonia. Neotrop Ichthyol. 2019; 17(1):e180099. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0224-20180099
Isaac VJ, Almeida MC, Cruz REA, Nunes LG. Artisanal fisheries of the Xingu River basin in Brazilian Amazon. Braz J Biol. 2015; 75(3):125–37. https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.00314BM
Kamino LHY, Pereira EO, Carmo FF. Conservation paradox: Large-scale mining waste in protected areas in two global hotspots, southeastern Brazil. Ambio. 2020; 49:1629–638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01326-8
Kehrig HDA, Malm O. Methylmercury in fish as a tool for understanding the Amazon mercury contamination. Appl Organomet Chem. 1999; 13(10):689–96. Khan RA. Parasitism in marine fish after chronic exposure to petroleum hydrocarbons in the laboratory and to the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 1990; 44(5):759–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01701799
Kimerling J. IInternational standards in Ecuador’s Amazon oil fields: the privatization of environmental law. Colum J Envtl L. 2001; 26:289–397.
Kimerling J. Indigenous people and the oil frontier in Amazonia: The case of Ecuador, ChevronTexaco and Aguinda vs Texaco. International Law Politics. 2006; 38:413–664.
Lambertz M, Dergam JA. Mining disaster: Huge species impact. Nature. 2015; 528:39. https://doi.org/10.1038/528039b
Leady BS, Gottgens JF. Mercury accumulation in sediment cores and along food chains in two regions of the Brazilian Pantanal. Wetl Ecol Manag. 2001; 9:349–61. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011856517552
Leduc G. Deleterious effects of cyanide on early life stages of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). J Fish Res Board Can. 1978; 35(2):166–74.
Leitão RP, Zuanon J, Mouillot D, Leal CG, Hughes RM, Kaufmann PR et al. Disentangling the pathways of land use impacts on the functional structure of fish assemblages in Amazon streams. Ecography. 2018; 41:219–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ecog.02845
León A, Zúñiga M. La sombra del petróleo Informe de los derrames petroleros en la Amazonía peruana entre el 2000 y el 2019. Perú: Tarea Asociación Gráfica Educativa; 2020.
Lima DPD, Santos C, Silva RDS, Yoshioka ETO, Bezerra RM. Contaminação por metais pesados em peixes e água da bacia do rio Cassiporé, Estado do Amapá, Brasil. Acta Amazonica. 2015; 45(4):405–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1809-4392201403995
Lima APS, Sarkis JES, Shihomatsu HM, Müller RCS. Mercury and selenium concentrations in fish samples from Cachoeira do Piria Municipality, Para State, Brazil. Environ Res. 2005;97(3):236–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2004.05.005
Lin DSC, Caramaschi EP. Responses of the fish community to the flood pulse and siltation in a floodplain lake of the Trombetas River, Brazil. Hydrobiologia. 2005; 545:75–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-005-2186-x
Lino AS, Kasper D, Guida YS, Thomaz JR, Malm O. Total and methyl mercury distribution in water, sediment, plankton and fish along the Tapajós River basin in the Brazilian Amazon. Chemosphere. 2019; 235:690–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.06.212
Liu Z, Liu J. Evaluating bacterial community structures in oil collected from the sea surface and sediment in the northern Gulf of Mexico after the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Microbiologyopen. 2013; 2(3):492–504. https://doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.89
Lobo F, Costa M, Novo E, Telmer K. Distribution of artisanal and small-scale gold mining in the Tapajós River Basin (Brazilian Amazon) over the past 40 Years and relationship with water siltation. Remote Sens. 2016; 8(7):579. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8070579
Lobón-Cerviá J, Mazzoni R, Rezende CF. Effects of riparian forest removal on the trophic dynamics of a Neotropical stream fish assemblage. J Fish Biol. 2016; 89(1):50–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.12973
Lopes FA, Lana CE, Castro PTA. Sedimentologia e geocronologia aplicadas a investigação da influência da mineração de ferro no assoreamento de afluentes do rio Paraopeba, oeste do quadrilátero ferrífero, MG, Brasil. Anuário IGEO. 2019; 42(2):149–58. https://doi.org/10.11137/2019_2_149_158
Lorion CM, Kennedy BP. Riparian forest buffers mitigate the effects of deforestation on fish assemblages in tropical headwater streams. Ecol Appl. 2009; 19(2):468–79. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-0050.1
Macêdo AKS, Dos Santos KPE, Brighenti LS, Windmöller CC, Barbosa FAR, de Azambuja Ribeiro RIM et al. Histological and molecular changes in gill and liver of fish (Astyanax lacustris Lütken, 1875) exposed to water from the Doce basin after the rupture of a mining tailings dam in Mariana, MG, Brazil. Sci Total Environ.2020; 735:139505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139505
Magnuson JT, Bautista NM, Lucero J, Lund AK, Xu EG, Schlenk D et al. Exposure to crude oil induces retinal apoptosis and impairs visual function in fish. Environ Sci Technol. 2020; 54(5):2843–850. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b07658
Makrakis S, Castro-Santos T, Makrakis MC, Wagner RL, Adames MS. Culverts in paved roads as suitable passages for Neotropical fish species. Neotrop Ichthyol. 2012; 10(4):763–70. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-62252012000400009
Malm O. Gold mining as a source of mercury exposure in the Brazilian Amazon. Environ Res. 1998; 77(2):73–78. https://doi.org/10.1006/enrs.1998.3828
Malm O, Branches FJ, Akagi H, Castro MB, Pfeiffer WC, Harada M et al. Mercury and methylmercury in fish and human hair from the Tapajós River basin, Brazil. Sci Total Environ 1995; 175(2):141–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(95)04910-X
Mariano JR, Makrakis MC, Kashiwaqui EAL, Celestino EF, Makrakis S. Longitudinal habitat disruption in Neotropical streams: fish assemblages under the influence of culverts. Neotrop Ichthyol. 2012; 10(4):771–84. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-62252012000400010
Marrugo-Negrete JL, Ruiz-Guzmán JA, Ruiz-Fernández AC. Biomagnification of mercury in fish from two gold mining-impacted tropical marshes in northern Colombia. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2018; 74(1):121–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-017-0459-9
Martinez G, McCord SA, Driscoll CT, Todorova S, Wu S, Araújo JF et al. Mercury contamination in riverine sediments and fish associated with artisanal and small-scale gold mining in Madre de Dios, Peru. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(8):1584. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15081584
Maury-Brachet R, Gentes S, Dassié EP, Feurtet-Mazel A, Vigouroux R, Laperche V et al. Mercury contamination levels in the bioindicator piscivorous fish Hoplias aimara in French Guiana rivers: mapping for risk assessment. Environ Sci Pollut Res.2020; 27(4):3624–636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3983-x
McCrary JK, Castro M, McKaye KR. Mercury in fish from two Nicaraguan lakes: a recommendation for increased monitoring of fish for international commerce. Environ Pollut.2006; 141(3):513–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2005.08.062
Meira RMSA, Peixoto AL, Coelho MAN, Ponzo APL, Esteves VGL, Silva MC et al. Brazil’s mining code under attack: giant mining companies impose unprecedented risk to biodiversity. Biodivers Conserv. 2016; 25:407–09. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1050-9
Meira-Neto JAA, Neri AV. Appealing the death sentences of the Doce, São Francisco and Amazonas rivers: stopping the Mining Lobby and creating ecosystem services reserves. Perspect Ecol Conserv. 2017; 15(3):199–201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2017.06.008
Melo MGG, Medeiros RS, Sampaio PTB, Vieira G. Sustainability issues: riparian vegetation and its importance in the hydrological cycle in Amazonian ecosystems. J Secur Sustain Issues. 2018; 7(4):861–68. http://www.tb.lt/Leidiniai/SSI/7-4/7_4_21.pdf
Mezzaroba L, Debona T, Frota A, Graça WJ, Gubiani ÉA. From the headwaters to the Iguassu Falls: Inventory of the ichthyofauna in the Iguassu River basin shows increasing percentages of nonnative species. Biota Neotrop. 2021; 21(2):e20201083. https://doi.org/10.1590/1676-0611-BN-2020-1083
Mol JH, Ouboter PE. Downstream effects of erosion from small-scale gold mining on the instream habitat and fish community of a small Neotropical rainforest stream. Conserv Biol. 2004; 18(1):201–14. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3589131
Mol JH, Ramlal JS, Lietar C, Verloo M. Mercury contamination in freshwater, estuarine, and marine fishes in relation to small-scale gold mining in Suriname, South America. Environ Res. 2001; 86(2):183–97. https://doi.org/10.1006/enrs.2001.4256
Monteiro DA, Taylor EW, Rantin FT, Kalinin AL. Impact of waterborne and trophic mercury exposures on cardiac function of two ecologically distinct Neotropical freshwater fish Brycon amazonicus and Hoplias malabaricus. Comp Biochem Phys Part C. 2017; 201:26–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpc.2017.09.004
Morel FMM, Kraepiel AML, Amyot M. The chemical cycle and bioaccumulation of mercury. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 1998; 29(1):543–66. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.543
Nascimento FL, Boëchat IG, Teixeira AO, Gücker B. High variability in sediment characteristics of a Neotropical stream impacted by surface mining and gully erosion. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2012; 223:389–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-011-0866-x
Nazareno A, Vitule J. Too many mining disasters in Brazil. Nature. 2016; 531:580. https://doi.org/10.1038/531580e
Neff J, Lee K, DeBlois EM. Produced Water: Overview of Composition, Fates, and Effects. In: Lee K, Neff J, editors. Produced Water. New York, NY: Springer; 2011. p.3–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0046-2_1
Nico LG, Taphorn DC. Mercury in fish from gold-mining regions in the upper Cuyuni river system, Venezuela. Fresenius Environ Bull.1994; 3(5):287–92.
Olden JD, Vitule JRS, Cucherousset J, Kennard MJ. There’s more to fish than just food: Exploring the diverse ways that fish contribute to human society. Fisheries. 2020; 45(9):453–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsh.10443
Olden JD, Vitule J, Pompeu PS, Couto TBA, Occhi T. 2019. Dam collapse at Brazilian mine exposes grave safety problems [Internet]. The Conversation; 2019. Available from: https://theconversation.com/dam-collapse-at-brazilian-mine-exposes-grave-safety-problems-110666
Olivero J, Solano B. Mercury in environmental samples from a waterbody contaminated by gold mining in Colombia, South America. Sci Total Environ.1998; 217(1–2):83–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(98)00175-2
Ostrensky A, Boeger WA, Duboc LF, Wegbecher FX, Pilchowski RW, Zamberlan E. Effect of the oil spill from the Presidente Getúlio Vargas Refinery, Brazil, in July of 2000, on the populations of fishes of the Rivers Saldanha, Barigüi, and Iguaçu. Internat Oil Spill Conf Proceed. 2003; 1:971–76. https://doi.org/10.7901/2169-3358-2003-1-971
Palacios-Torres Y, Caballero-Gallardo K, Olivero-Verbel J. Mercury pollution by gold mining in a global biodiversity hotspot, the Choco biogeographic region, Colombia. Chemosphere. 2018; 193:421–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.10.160
Palacios-Torres Y, Rosa JD, Olivero-Verbel J. Trace elements in sediments and fish from Atrato River: an ecosystem with legal rights impacted by gold mining at the Colombian Pacific. Environ Pollut.2020; 256:113290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113290
Palheta D, Taylor A. Mercury in environmental and biological samples from a gold mining area in the Amazon region of Brazil. Sci Total Environ. 1995; 168(1):63–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(95)04533-7
Pelicice FM, Azevedo-Santos VM, Vitule JRS, Orsi ML, Lima Junior DP, Magalhães ALB et al. Neotropical freshwater fishes imperilled by unsustainable policies. Fish Fish. 2017; 18(6):1119–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12228
Pelicice FM, Agostinho AA, Akama A, Andrade Filho JD, Azevedo-Santos VM, Barbosa MVM et al. Large-scale degradation of the Tocantins-Araguaia River basin. Environ Manage. 2021; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01513-7
Pelicice FM, Castello L. A political tsunami hits Amazon conservation. Aquatic Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst. 2021; 31:1221–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3565
Peterson SA, Van Sickle J, Herlihy AT, Hughes RM. Mercury concentration in fish from streams and rivers throughout the western United States. Environ Sci Technol. 2007; 41:58–65. https://doi.org/10.1021/es061070u
Pfeiffer WC, de Lacerda LD, Malm O, Souza CMM, da Silveira EG, Bastos WR. Mercury concentrations in inland waters of gold-mining areas in Rondonia, Brazil. Sci Total Environ. 1989; 87:233–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(89)90238-6
Pfeiffer WC, Malm O, Souza CMM, de Lacerda LD, Silveira EG, Bastos WR. Mercury in the Madeira River ecosystem, Rondônia, Brazil. Forest Ecol Manag. 1991; 38(3–4):239–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(91)90145-L
Porto JIR, Araujo CSO, Feldberg E. Mutagenic effects of mercury pollution as revealed by micronucleus test on three Amazonian fish species. Environ Res. 2005; 97(3):287–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2004.04.006
Porvari P. Mercury levels of fish in Tucurui hydroelectric reservoir and in River Moju in Amazonia, in the state of Para, Brazil. Sci Total Environ.1995; 175(2):109–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(95)04907-X
Pouilly M, Pérez T, Rejas D, Guzman F, Crespo G, Duprey JL et al. Mercury bioaccumulation patterns in fish from the Iténez river basin, Bolivian Amazon. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2012; 83:8–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2012.05.018
Pouilly M, Rejas D, Pérez T, Duprey JL, Molina CI, Hubas C, Guimarães JRD. Trophic structure and mercury biomagnification in tropical fish assemblages, Iténez River, Bolivia. PLoS One. 2013; 8(5):e65054. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065054
Reis RE, Albert JS, Di Dario F, Mincarone MM, Petry P, Rocha LA. Fish biodiversity and conservation in South America. J Fish Biol. 2016; 89(1):12–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.13016
Reuther R. Mercury accumulation in sediment and fish from rivers affected by alluvial gold mining in the Brazilian Madeira River basin, Amazon. Environ Monit Assess.1994; 32(3):239–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00546279
Reys P, Sabino J, Galetti M. Frugivory by the fish Brycon hilarii (Characidae) in western Brazil. Acta Oecol. 2009; 35(1):136–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2008.09.007
Richard S, Arnoux A, Cerdan P, Reynouard C, Horeau V. Mercury levels of soils, sediments and fish in French Guiana, South America. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2000; 124:221–44. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005251016314
Salvador GN, Leal CG, Brejão GL, Pessali TC, Alves CBM, Rosa GR et al. Mining activity in Brazil and negligence in action. Perspect Ecol Conserv. 2020; 18(2):139–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2020.05.003
Santos EC, Jesus IMD, Câmara VDM, Brabo E, Loureiro ECB, Mascarenhas A et al. Mercury exposure in Munduruku Indians from the community of Sai Cinza, State of Pará, Brazil.Environ Res.2002; 90(2):98–103. https://doi.org/10.1006/enrs.2002.4389
Santos LDS, Müller RC, de Sarkis JES, Alves CN, Brabo ES, Santos EO et al. Evaluation of total mercury concentrations in fish consumed in the municipality of Itaituba, Tapajos River Basin, Pará, Brazil. Sci Total Environ.2000; 261(1–3):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(00)00590-8
Santos ACA, Silva AT, Zanata AM, Chamon CC, Pavanelli CS, Oliveira CAM et al. Brycon vermelha Lima & Castro, 2000. In: ICMBio. Livro Vermelho da Fauna Brasileira Ameaçada de Extinção: Volume VI – Peixes. Brasília, DF: ICMBio/MMA; 2018. p.95–97. Available from: http://www.icmbio.gov.br/portal/component/content/article/10187
Sebastián MS, Hurtig AK. Oil exploitation in the Amazon basin of Ecuador: a public health emergency. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2004; 15(3):205–11. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1020-49892004000300014
Short J. Long-term effects of crude oil on developing fish: lessons from the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Energy Sources. 2003; 25:509–17.
Silva SF, Lima MO. Mercury in fish marketed in the Amazon triple frontier and health risk assessment. Chemosphere. 2020; 248:125989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.125989
Silva CS, Pereira SFP, Santos DC, Miranda RG, Rocha RM, Oliveira GR et al. The statistical application on assessment of the balance environmental restoration of the river Murucupi – Barcarena – PA –After the release of red mud. Proceed Safety Health Environment World Congress. 2012; 12:59–63.
Silva SF, Oliveira DC, Pereira JPG, Castro SP, Costa BNS, de Oliveira Lima M. Seasonal variation of mercury in commercial fishes of the Amazon Triple Frontier, Western Amazon Basin. Ecol Indic. 2019; 106:105549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105549
Smith WS, Lima RCR, Silva LCM, Corrêa CS, Teodoro CC, Soinski TA et al. A duplicação de rodovias no Brasil sob o olhar da Ictiofauna. Bol Soc Bras Ictio. 2018; 125:16–23.
Soares JM, Gomes JM, Anjos MR, Silveira JN, Custódio FB, Gloria MBA. Mercury in fish from the Madeira River and health risk to Amazonian and riverine populations. Food Res Int.2018; 109:537–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2018.04.069
Sonter LJ, Herrera D, Barrett DJ, Galford GL, Moran CJ, Soares-Filho BS. Mining drives extensive deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Nat Commun. 2017; 8(1): 1013. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00557-w
Souza-Araujo J, Giarrizzo T, Lima MO, Souza MBG. Mercury and methyl mercury in fishes from Bacaja River (Brazilian Amazon): evidence for bioaccumulation and biomagnification. J Fish Biol. 2016; 89(1):249–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.13027
Swenson JJ, Carter CE, Domec JC, Delgado CI. Gold mining in the Peruvian Amazon: Global prices, deforestation, and mercury imports. PLoS ONE. 2011; 6(4):e18875. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018875
Tarras-Wahlberg NH, Flachier A, Lane SN, Sangfors O. Environmental impacts and metal exposure of aquatic ecosystems in rivers contaminated by small scale gold mining: the Puyango River basin, southern Ecuador. Sci Total Environ.2001; 278(1–3):239–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(01)00655-6
Teresa FB, Casatti L, Cianciaruso MV. Functional differentiation between fish assemblages from forested and deforested streams. Neotrop Ichthyol. 2015; 13(2):361–70. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0224-20130229
Thomaz SM, Gomes Barbosa L, de Souza Duarte MC, Panosso R. Opinion: The future of nature conservation in Brazil. Inland Waters.2020; 10(2):295–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/20442041.2020.1750255
Thompson F, Oliveira BC, Cordeiro MC, Mais BP, Rangel TP, Paz P et al. Severe impacts of the Brumadinho dam failure (Minas Gerais, Brazil) on the water quality of the Paraopeba River. Sci Total Environ. 2020; 705:135914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135914
Tófoli RM, Dias RM, Alves GHZ, Hoeinghaus DJ, Gomes LC, Baumgartner MT et al. Gold at what cost? Another megaproject threatens biodiversity in the Amazon. Perspect Ecol Conserv. 2017; 15(2):129–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2017.06.003
Toussaint A, Charpin N, Brosse S, Villéger S. Global functional diversity of freshwater fish is concentrated in the Neotropics while functional vulnerability is widespread. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:22125. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep22125
Uryu Y, Malm O, Thornton I, Payne I, Cleary D. Mercury contamination of fish and its implications for other wildlife of the Tapajós Basin, Brazilian Amazon. Conserv Biol. 2001; 15(2):438–46.
Verbete. Exploração de cobre em Minas do Camaquã (RS) provocou alterações na paisagem [Internet]. Rio de Janeiro: Centro de Tecnologia Mineral Ministério da Ciência e da Tecnologia; 2012. Available from: http://verbetes.cetem.gov.br/verbetes/ExibeVerbete.aspx?verid=19
Vergilio CS, Lacerda D, Oliveira BCV, Sartori E, Campos GM, Pereira ALS et al. Metal concentrations and biological effects from one of the largest mining disasters in the world (Brumadinho, Minas Gerais, Brazil). Sci Rep. 2020; 10:5936. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62700-w
Vick SG. Failure of the Omai tailings dam. Geotechnical News-Vancouver. 1996; 14:34–40.
Virgilio LR, Ramalho WP, Silva JCB, Susçuarana MS, Brito CH, Soares LJ. Does riparian vegetation affect fish assemblage? A longitudinal gradient analysis in three Amazonian streams. Acta Sci Biol Sci. 2018; 40:e42562. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascibiolsci.v40i1.42562
Villén-Perez S, Mendes P, Nóbrega C, Córtes LG, Marco Junior PM. Mining code changes undermine biodiversity conservation in Brazil. Environ Conserv. 2017; 45(1):96–99. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892917000376
Vitule JRS, Agostinho AA, Azevedo-Santos VM, Daga VS, Darwall WRT, Fitzgerald DB et al. We need better understanding about functional diversity and vulnerability of tropical freshwater fishes. Biodivers Conserv. 2017; 26:757–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1258-8
Wantzen K, Mol J. Soil erosion from agriculture and mining: A threat to tropical stream ecosystems. Agriculture. 2013; 3(4):660–83. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture3040660
Weber AA, Sales CF, de Souza Faria F, Melo RMC, Bazzoli N, Rizzo E. Effects of metal contamination on liver in two fish species from a highly impacted neotropical river: A case study of the Fundão dam, Brazil. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf.2020; 190:110165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110165
Winemiller KO, McIntyre PB, Castello L, Fluet-Chouinard E, Giarrizzo T, Nam S et al. Balancing hydropower and biodiversity in the Amazon, Congo, and Mekong. Science. 2016; 351:128–29. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac7082
Windsor FM, Tilley RM, Tyler CR, Ormerod SJ. Microplastic ingestion by riverine macroinvertebrates. Sci Total Environ. 2019; 646:68–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.271
Wise. Chronology of major tailings dam failures [Internet]. World Information Service on Energy; 2020. Available from: http://www.wise-uranium.org/mdaf.html
Yusta-García R, Orta-Martínez M, Mayor P, González-Crespo C, Rosell-Melé A. Water contamination from oil extraction activities in Northern Peruvian Amazonian rivers. Environ Pollut. 2017; 225:370–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.02.063
Zawadzki CH, Renesto E, Bini LM. Genetic and morphometric analysis of three species of the genus Hypostomus Lacépède, 1803 (Osteichthyes, Loricariidae) from the Rio Iguaçu basin (Brazil). Rev Suisse Zool. 1999; 106:91–105. http://dx.doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.80072
Valter M. Azevedo-Santos1 , Marlene S. Arcifa2 , Marcelo F. G. Brito3 , Angelo A. Agostinho4 , Robert M. Hughes5 , 6 , Jean R.S. Vitule7 , Daniel Simberloff8 , Julian D. Olden3 and Fernando M. Pelicice10
 Oregon State University, Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, & Conservation Sciences, Corvallis, OR, USA.
Valter M. Azevedo-Santos: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Supervision, Writing-original draft, Writing-review and editing.
Marlene S. Arcifa: Methodology, Writing-original draft, Writing-review and editing.
Marcelo F. G. Brito: Methodology, Writing-review and editing.
Angelo A. Agostinho: Writing-review and editing.
Robert M. Hughes: Writing-review and editing.
Jean R.S. Vitule: Writing-review and editing.
Daniel Simberloff: Writing-review and editing.
Julian D. Olden: Writing-review and editing.
Fernando M. Pelicice: Writing-review and editing.
The authors declare no competing interests.
How to cite this article
Azevedo-Santos VM, Arcifa MS, Brito MFG, Agostinho AA, Hughes RM, Vitule JRS, Simberloff D, Olden JD, Pelicice FM. Negative impacts of mining on Neotropical freshwater fishes. Neotrop Ichthyol. 2021; 19(3):e210001. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0224-2021-0001
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0
© 2021 The Authors.
Diversity and Distributions Published by SBI
Accepted May 17, 2021 by Paulo Pompeu
Submitted January 1, 2021
Epub Sept 17, 2021