Carlos Alfonso Frías-Quintana , Emyr Saul Peña-Marín Carlos David Ramírez-Custodio Rafael Martínez-García Luis Daniel Jiménez-Martínez Susana Camarillo-Coop Rocío Guerrero-Zárate Gloria Gertrudys Asencio-Alcudia and Carlos Alfonso Álvarez-González
The fish culture in Mexico has been supported from the beginning by the culture of introduced fish such as rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum, 1792), grass carp Ctenopharyngodon idella (Valenciennes, 1844), and Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus, 1758), which has imitated the development of technology for the culture of native fish species. As a scientific and technological discipline, aquaculture has had a relatively recent development and research, particularly with native fish species, to understand many fundamental aspects such as biology, ecology, and physiology (Dávila-Camacho et al., 2019). However, in Southeast Mexico, there are some native cichlid species with great commercial importance such as bay snook Petenia splendida Günther, 1862, Mayan cichlid Mayaheros urophthalmus (Günther, 1862), redhead cichlid Vieja melanurus (Günther, 1862), and twoband cichlid Vieja bifasciata (Steindachner, 1864) (Pérez-Sánchez, Páramo-Delgadillo, 2008). All these species have a high demand in the local market, proper growth, and excellent meat quality (Uscanga-Martínez et al., 2011). Vieja melanurus and V. bifasciata have a neotropical distribution and can be found in shallow waters such as lakes, lagoons, and swampy areas and on the banks of rivers and flood zones of the state of Tabasco (lower part of Usumacinta), in Guatemala (to the north in the Petén area) and Belize. Their feeding habit is omnivorous, mainly based on insects, larvae of smaller fish, and aquatic plants. However, although larviculture is currently achieved using Artemia nauplii and commercial trout feed, it is unknown if these foods are suitable for this stage since necessary studies have not been carried out on the digestive physiology in V. bifasciata and V. melanurus. Thus, there has been a growing interest in developing technologies with native species for their incorporation and culture for commercial purposes. Research efforts aim to determine the conditions that increase the survival and viability of crop production and characterize digestive physiology to develop a better plan feeding schedule. In the last case, the studies are based on the detailed knowledge of the digestive physiology in different life stages by determining the digestive enzymatic activities and characterization of proteases. This aspect has been verified that the level of activity of some enzymes acts as a good indicator of nutritional status, so that the data obtained may be relevant to establish an optimal artificial feed to be used in its culture and reduce production costs in hatcheries (Ueberschär, 1993). Recently, several studies have been conducted to relate the appearance of digestive enzymes with physiological and nutritional aspects in various species such as the Adriatic sturgeon Acipenser naccarii Bonaparte, 1836, California halibut Paralichthys californicus (Ayres, 1859), sardine Sardinella aurita Valenciennes, 1847, manjuarí Atractosteus tristoechus (Bloch & Schneider, 1801), pike perch Sander lucioperca (Linnaeus, 1758), Mayaheros urophthalmus, Petenia splendida, tropical gar Atractosteus tropicus Gill, 1863, three spot cichlid Cichlasoma trimaculatum (= Amphilophus trimaculatus (Günther, 1867), thicklip grey mullet Chelon labrosus (Risso, 1827), common snook Centropomus undecimalis (Bloch, 1792), green cichlid Cichlasoma beani (= Mayaheros beani (Jordan, 1889)), sheepshead Archosargus probatocephalus (Walbaum, 1792), longfin yellowtail Seriola rivoliana Valenciennes, 1833, and short-tailed pipefish Microphis brachyurus (Bleeker, 1854) (Furnè et al., 2005; Álvarez-González et al., 2005; Comabella et al., 2006; Hamza et al., 2007; Khaled et al., 2011; López-Ramírez et al., 2011; Uscanga-Martínez et al.,2011; Guerrero-Zarate et al.,2014; Toledo-Solís et al., 2015; Pujante et al.,2016; Concha-Frias et al., 2016; Martínez-Cárdenas et al., 2017; Merino-Contreras et al., 2018; Teles et al., 2019; Martínez-Cárdenas et al., 2020). In this way, this work aims to characterize the digestive proteases determining the optimum and stability of pH and temperature and the effect of general and specific inhibitors in juveniles of V. bifasciata and V. melanurus using the biochemical technique.
Material and methods
Obtaining and processing samples. For digestive protease characterization trials 100 juveniles (50 fish per species, 1–2 g wet weight and 5–8 cm of total length) of Vieja bifasciata (voucher ECOSC 14764, five specimens), and V. melanurus (voucher ECOSC 14765, five specimens) were captured in the Sánchez Magallanes Lagoon (average temperature of 32.1 ± 0.5°C and >5 mg L-1 dissolved oxygen) and transported to the Laboratorio de Acuicultura Tropical of the Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco and placed in three 70 L capacity tanks with constant aeration. Fish were fed an apparent satiation three times per day (8:00, 14:00 and 20:00 h) with trout diet (Silver Cup, 45% protein and 16% lipid) for a period of 30 days.All organisms per species were used for digestive enzymatic characterization, which were previously starved for 48 h, and then, fish were sacrificed by freezing in ice-cold water. Afterward, they were weighed before, and after evisceration, the stomach and intestine were removed separately, which were homogenized with a tissue homogenizer (ULTRA TURRAX® IKA T18 Basic). The extracts were prepared in a 100 mmol L-1 glycine buffer solution pH 2 for the stomach extracts, and tris buffer 100 mmol L-1 CaCl2 10 mmol L-1 at pH 9 for the intestine extracts in a 5: 1 ratio (5 mL of buffer per g of tissue) at 4°C, the obtained mixture was placed in Eppendorf tubes (1 mL per tube) and centrifuged at 14000 rpm at 4°C. The supernatant was extracted, and the pH required for each extract was adjusted then stored in Eppendorf tubes at -80ºC until further enzymatic analysis.
Digestive proteases evaluation. The concentration of soluble protein in the multienzymatic extracts was determined following Bradford’s (1976) technique, using bovine serum albumin (600 mg mL-1) as the standard protein. For the activity of acid protease, the technique of Anson (1938) was applied using as substrate hemoglobin (1%), and with the following modifications: 1 mL of hemoglobin al (1%) in buffer 100 mmol L-1 glycine-HCl at pH 2.0 was added 50 μL of multienzyme extract. The extract was incubated for 2 hours at 37°C, and the reaction was stopped by the addition of 0.5 mL of trichloroacetic acid (20% TCA). After standing the reaction mixture (15 to 30 min) at 4°C, it was centrifuged at 16000 g for 5 min. The amount of tyrosine released (280 nm) was measured by uv/visible spectrophotometer in the supernatant. One activity unit was defined as the amount of enzyme that catalyzes the formation of 1 μg of tyrosine per minute. Tyrosine molar extinction coefficient was determined using different tyrosine concentrations (from 0 to 300 μg mL-1). All tests were performed in triplicate.
The determination of alkaline protease activity was performed by the method of Kunitz (1947) modified by Walter (1984) using 1% casein as the substrate in a buffer 100 mmol L-1 Tris-HCl, 10 mmol L-1 CaCl2 at pH 9. The reaction was stopped with 20% trichloroacetic acid (TCA), and the amount of tyrosine released was determined according to the protocol described in the previous section.
Effect of pH on the activity and stability of proteases. The effect of pH on acid and alkaline protease activities in the enzymatic extracts of juveniles of Vieja bifasciata and V. melanurus were incubated with hemoglobin (1%) diluted with universal buffer Stauffer (1989), with a pH range from 2 to 12, following the procedure of activity determination enzyme described above for this type of proteases. In the case of alkaline proteases, casein (1%) buffered with the same buffer and using the same pH values was used as the substrate. All these tests were performed in triplicate.
The effect of pH on the stability of the acid and alkaline protease activity was determined by preincubated the extracts at different pH (from 2 to 12) with times of 0, 30, 60 and 90 min, then their activity was measured at normal pH (2 for acidic proteases and 9 for alkaline proteases) following the techniques described above. The results were shown in relation to the residual activity at regular intervals with respect to a control without preincubating. For all the stability tests, the values of zero reaction times were taken, such as 100% of the residual activity that allowed observing the enzyme’s fluctuations from that moment.
Effect of temperature on the activity and stability of proteases. To determine the optimal temperature and the influence of temperature on the stability of the acid and alkaline proteases of the digestive proteases, the extracts of the juveniles were incubated in the substrates of hemoglobin (1%) and casein (1%), with the techniques described above for activities of acidic proteases (Anson, 1938) and alkaline (Kunitz, 1947 modified by Walter, 1984), respectively at a temperature range from 25 to 75ºC. Different incubation times were used for pH and temperature stability for this type of proteases at temperatures from 25 to 65°C with preincubation times of 0, 30, 60, and 90 min for each temperature. All these tests were performed in triplicate.
Enzymatic inhibition in digestive proteases. The characterization of alkaline proteases was obtained also applying the method of Dunn (1989), using different types of inhibitors: Tosyl-L-lysyl-chloromethane hydrochloride 10 mmol L-1 (TLCK), N-p-Tosyl-L-phenylalanine chloromethyl ketone 10 mmol L-1 (TPCK), Soybean trypsin inhibitor 250 mmol L-1 (SBT1), Phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride 100 mmol L-1 (PMSF), Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid 10 mmol L-1 (EDTA), Ovalbumin 250 mmol L-1 (OVO), and Phenanthroline 10 mmol L-1 (PHEN), mixing 20 μL of multienzyme extract and preincubated with 20 μL of each inhibitor for 1 hour at 37°C. After the preincubation, the technique described for the determination of alkaline proteases was applied; the result of the tests was compared with a control without inhibitors, to obtain the residual activity.
Statistical analysis. Data did not comply with the assumptions of normality and homoscedasticity, therefore, a nonparametric variance analysis (Kruskal-Wallis) was used to compare the residual activity between pH, and Chi2 test from the arcsine transformation was used to analyze temperature stability and the percentage of residual activity in the inhibition tests of acidic and alkaline proteases. A non-parametric Nemenyi test was used when significant differences were detected. All tests were carried out with Statistica v 7.0 software (StatSoft, Tulsa, OK, EU).
Optimum pH and stability of acidic and alkaline proteases. The optimal pH of the proteases in the stomach extracts was 4 for Vieja bifasciata, this being the highest peak of relative activity, which was decreasing constantly, while V. melanurus obtained an optimum pH of 2, which represents the maximum activity and starting from this peak activity decreased gradually (Fig. 1A). The optimum pH obtained for alkaline proteases was 6 for V. melanurus,which presented different oscillations in its activity, with pH 6 being the highest peak of activity, while for V. bifasciata it presented oscillations in its alkaline activity, with a peak of maximum activity at pH 12 (Fig. 1B).
The acid digestive proteases of Vieja melanurus presented a peak of maximum activity around 110%, during 90 min of preincubation with a pH 2.0; same that decreased its activity at 60 min, presenting again an increase at 90 min of preincubation, while the other activities at different pHs maintained percentages below 50% (Fig. 2A). Meanwhile, V. bifasciata obtained a percentage of activity of the acid proteases of 105% during 30 min of preincubation at pH 4.0, which was decreasing at 60 min and increased slightly at 90 min of preincubation, being the activity of pH 4, which it stood out above 100% of relative activity compared to other evaluated pH’s (Fig. 2B). The maximum residual activity of digestive alkaline proteases for V. melanurus was obtained at pH 10, which was increased from 30 min to 90 min of preincubation, where it presented its peak of maximum activity (approximately 125%) (Fig. 2C). Finally, the activity of alkaline proteases in V. bifasciata increase of approximately 120% at a pH of 10, during 30 min of preincubation itself, which decreased after 60 and 90 min, while the other activities remained below 110% of relative activity (Fig. 2D).
Optimum temperature and stability in acidic and alkaline proteases. The optimal temperature in the stomach enzymatic extract was detected at 55°C for Vieja bifasciata which increased from 45°C, presenting its maximum activity peak at 55°C and decreased at 65°C, while for V. melanurus it showed a peak of maximum activity at 35°C and gradually decreased to 65°C (Fig. 3A). Regarding the optimal temperature of the alkaline proteases for V. melanurus, an increase in temperature occurred from 35°C to 45°C, this being the maximum activity peak and subsequently, its activity decreased until reaching 65°C, while for V. bifasciata, it showed oscillations in the increase in activity until reaching 55°C as the temperature with the highest activity of the alkaline proteases (Fig. 3B).
Concerning the temperature stability in acidic conditions for Vieja melanurus, it was observed that at 45°C the temperature is maintained over 100% of the relative activity (approximately 110) during 60 min of preincubation, increasing to 90 min, while at 25°C the protease activity also remains quite stable (Fig. 4A); however, for V. bifasciata it presents an increase in activity at 55°C for 60 min, showing the highest residual activity (110%), descending drastically at 90 min, however, the temperature of 65°C showed oscillations at 30, 60 and 90 min, while the temperature of 35°C showed a gradual decrease (Fig. 4B). For the stability of temperature in alkaline proteases of V. melanurus, an increase of the relative activity was shown at 45°C, presenting the maximum peak (approximately 105%) at 90 min of preincubation, at 35°C the protease activity also remains quite stable with a peak of activity at 30 min of preincubation (Fig. 4C), as well as V. bifasciata, there was an increase at 55°C with a preincubation time of 30 min, this being the maximum activity around 120% relative activity, with a drastic decrease in activity at 90°C, at 25 and 35°C the protease activity also remains fairly stable until 60 min of preincubation, after which the activity at 35°C declines (Fig. 4D). The rest of the temperatures recorded residual activities that remain around 100%, in case of 55 and 65°C they remain below 50% of the residual activities.
FIGURE 1 | Effect of optimal pH (mean ± SD, n = 3) on A. acid proteases and B. alkaline proteases of Vieja melanurus and V. bifasciata. Significant differences (P< 0.05) between pH values are shown by letters.
FIGURE 2 | pH stability of acid digestive protease for A. Vieja melanurus and B. V. bifasciata; and alkaline digestive protease for C. V. melanurus and D. V. bifasciata (mean ± SD, n = 3). Significant differences (P< 0.05) between pH values residual activity are shown by letters.
FIGURE 3 | Effect of optimal temperature (mean ± SD, n = 3) on A. acid proteases and B. alkaline proteases of Vieja melanurus and V. bifasciata. Significant differences (P< 0.05) between pH values are shown by letters.
Effect of the inhibitors on acid and alkaline enzymes. The residual activity of alkaline proteases showed that for trypsin TLCK was 24% for Vieja melanurus and 50% for V. bifasciata, in the case of chymotrypsin the residual activity was 27% and 53% using TPCK as a specific inhibitor for both species, meanwhile with SBT1 the residual activity was 7% and 55% respectively; PMSF showed 1.3% and 42%, on case of metalloproteases the EDTA left 10% and 52%, while with ovalbumin left 2.7% and 46% of activity residual, finally with phenanthroline (PHEN) the residual activity was 12% and 20% for V. melanurus and V. bifasciata, respectively (Fig. 5).
FIGURE 4 | Temperature stability of acid digestive protease for A. Vieja melanurus and B. V. bifasciata; and alkaline digestive protease for C. V. melanurus and D. V. bifasciata (mean ± SD, n = 3). Significant differences (P< 0.05) between pH values residual activity are shown by letters.
FIGURE 5 | Effect of inhibitors on alkaline digestive proteases of Vieja melanurus and V. bifasciata: Alkaline control (alkaline proteases without inhibitor), TPCK (N-p-Tosyl-L-phenylalanine chloromethyl ketone), PHEN (phenanthroline), EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid), TLCK (Tosyl-L-lysyl-chloromethane hydrochloride), OVO (ovalbumin), SBT1 (soybean trypsin inhibitor), PMSF (phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) (mean ± SD, n = 3) significant differences (P< 0.05) between inhibitors values are shown by letters. Different letter between bars indicates statistical differences.
The maximum pH value of the stomach extracts found in Vieja melanurus was located within the parameters reported by other studies using hemoglobin in the acid hydrolysis (Rodrigáñez et al., 2005; Kumar et al., 2007; Xiong et al.,2011; Guerrero-Zárate et al., 2014; Toledo-Solís et al., 2015; Pujante et al., 2016; Concha-Frias et al.,2016; Martínez-Cárdenas et al., 2017; Merino-Contreras et al.,2018; Teles et al., 2019; Martínez-Cárdenas et al., 2020). Some studies reported the maximum pH values for the stomach between 2.0–3.0; however, they differ with V. bifasciata, which obtained a pH value of 4, although it is still an acidic condition not previously reported. Considering the above-mentioned, Uscanga-Martínez et al. (2011) recorded a stomach pH close to neutral at pH 5 in P. splendida, which suggests that pH 4 is within the acidity parameters suitable for the enzymatic activity of V. bifasciata.
In the case of alkaline proteases, the maximum value in enzymatic activity at pH was reported in a single peak at pH 6 for V. melanurus that is different from that found in other species. However, there are investigations with the blue disc Symphysodon aequifasciatus Pellegrin, 1904 and gilthead seabream Sparus aurata Linnaeus, 1758 (Chong et al., 2002; Deguara et al., 2003) in which two activity peaks were found in the alkaline part, lower than pH 8.0. In this aspect, Concha-Frias et al. (2016) obtained a peak of activity at pH 7 in C. undecimalis juveniles, which is consistent with these authors; this may be since V. melanurus requires an acid, almost neutral environment to activate alkaline proteases. However for V. bifasciata, two maximum pH peaks of 6 and 12, which is outside the range of values reported in other marine and freshwater species that generally lies between pH 8.0–11.0, such as those found in bluefin tuna Thunnus thynnus (Linnaeus, 1758), mahi languish fish Scleropages formosus (Müller & Schlegel, 1840), Senegalese sole Solea senegalensis Kaup, 1858, P. splendida, A. tropicus, C. trimaculatum, C. labrosus, C. undecimalis, C. beani, A. probatocephalus and M. brachyurus (Eshel et al., 1993; Natalia et al., 2004; Rodrigáñez et al., 2005; Uscanga-Martínez et al., 2011; Guerrero-Zárate et al., 2014; Toledo-Solís et al., 2015; Pujante et al., 2016; Concha-Frias et al., 2016; Martínez-Cárdenas et al., 2017; Merino-Contreras et al., 2018; Martínez-Cárdenas et al., 2020), this could be explained as the residual activities recorded depend not only on a protein but on a group of proteins that interact with each other and can get to be activated at different pHs and temperatures even in alkaline conditions and this will depend on the type of enzyme and the substrate in which it is interacting with other proteins that result in different residual activities.
The stability tests of the pH on the activity in the stomach enzymatic extracts of V. melanurus showed a remarkable ability to maintain its activity above 100% of the activity at acidic conditions (pH 4). For V. bifasciata the residual activity was above 100% at a pH of 4 during the 30 min of preincubation, keeping enzymatic activity constant because it is in the preferential activity range. As already mentioned, as the pH towards the alkaline part was increased, the enzymatic activity declined, which agrees with those reported in A. tropicus, C. trimaculatum, C. labrosus, C. undecimalis, C. beani, A. probatocephalus, and M. brachyrus (Guerrero-Zárate et al.,2014; Toledo-Solís et al., 2015; Pujante et al., 2016; Concha-Frias et al., 2016; Martínez-Cárdenas et al.,2017; Merino-Contreras et al.,2018; Martínez-Cárdenas et al., 2020). This situation shows that enzymes have higher activity in acidic conditions when the pH is within the range of 2–4, due to the secretion of HCl from the stomach glands, which promotes acid digestion, while peristaltic movements are the cause of the movement of the chyme to the anterior intestine for alkaline digestion (Moyano et al., 1996; Díaz-López et al., 1998).
On the other hand, the pH stability for alkaline protease was 6 for V. melanurus, and pH 12 for V. bifasciata. The last one corresponds to the normal range of pH for alkaline proteases in marine and freshwater (Natalia et al.,2004; Rodrigáñez et al., 2005; Uscanga-Martínez et al.,2011; Guerrero-Zárate et al.,2014; Toledo-Solís et al., 2015; Pujante et al., 2016; Concha-Frias et al., 2016; Martínez-Cárdenas et al.,2017; Merino-Contreras et al.,2018; Martínez-Cárdenas et al., 2020). However, these pH values presented variations of incubation times for V. melanurus were 90 min and for V. bifasciata 30 min, which is an indication that even though both species handle the same alkaline pH values. These variations in pH for the activation time of alkaline proteases vary by species, food habit or environmental variations (Solovyev et al., 2015).
The maximum temperatures recorded in the stomach enzymatic extracts for V. melanurus and V. bifasciata were 35°C and 55°C, respectively; the results for V. melanurus are within the ranges of 40–55°C, established both in marine and sweet aquaculture species (Alarcón et al., 1998; Rodrigáñez et al.,2005; de la Parra et al.,2007; Uscanga-Martínez et al.,2011; Toledo-Solís et al., 2015; Pujante et al., 2016; Martínez-Cárdenas et al.,2017; Merino-Contreras et al., 2018; Teles et al., 2019; Martínez-Cárdenas et al.,2020); however, V. bifasciata recorded a maximum digestive activity at 55°C in the stomach, which suggests that differences in temperature vary to carry out the denaturation of proteins by stomach enzymes, which occurs at a temperature range from 35°C to 65°C, these are determined by different features linked to the molecular structure of the proteins (amino acid sequence, folding, number and position of disulfide bonds, the structure of the active site, etc.); however, these studies have do not been done in this research. On the other hand, the temperature in alkaline proteases was obtained at 45°C for V. melanurus and 55°C for V. bifasciata, which are within the same range (Jónás et al., 1983; Xiong et al., 2011; Villalba-Villalba et al.,2011), where they reported maximum activity at temperatures of 45–55°C. In contrast, temperatures of 35°C and 55°C for acidic conditions have been reported in both marine and freshwater species (Toledo-Solís et al., 2015; Pujante et al., 2016; Martínez-Cárdenas et al.,2017; Merino-Contreras et al.,2018; Martínez-Cárdenas et al., 2020).
Regarding the stability of the proteases, the enzymatic activities of the stomach and intestine for V. melanurus was 45°C and for V. bifasciata 55°C on 100% of the relative activity, both during 60 min of preincubation, these temperatures remaining stable for both species, these data are different from those reported by Guerrero-Zárate et al. (2014), where they mention stable temperatures below 45°C since most fish are ectotherms. Since fish cannot regulate their temperature, they depend entirely on the environment, being temperatures of 30–32°C that predominate for tropical fish species. Of course, the digestive enzymes cannot respond to such temperatures (above 45 ºC), as in the case of P. splendida (Uscanga-Martínez et al., 2011), C. trimaculatum (Toledo-Solís et al., 2015); C. beani (Martínez-Cárdenas et al., 2017); A. probatocephalus (Merino-Contreras et al.,2018) with recorded intervals of 35°C and 55°C. In the case of C. undecimalis (Concha-Frias et al., 2016), alkaline proteases tolerate and even work better at 65°C. In such cases, digestive physiology compensates the high temperatures required for the enzymes (35–65°C), increasing the retention time of food, by closing the cardiac and pyloric sphincters, in addition to the effect that gastric hormones (gastrin and CCK) cause by increasing the peristaltic movements of the stomach and intestine, respectively (Kurokawa et al., 2003; Cahu et al., 2004).
Inhibition of alkaline proteases in both species was high; however, the most affected species is V. melanurus, with the lowest residual activity for all inhibitors and inactivators. These high inhibition values correspond to omnivorous fish species, which has been reported for other neotropical cichlids by Toledo-Solís et al. (2015) in C. trimaculatum and Martínez-Cárdenas et al. (2017) in C. beani. Both authors found similar inhibition percentages for trypsin and chymotrypsin with TLCK, TPCK, and SBT1. Different results on the effect of the protease inhibitors have been reported in other fish species such as the carp Catla catla (= Labeo catla (Hamilton, 1822)), roho labeo Labeo rohita (Hamilton, 1822), silver carp Hypophthalmichthys molitrix (Valenciennes, 1844), P. splendida, sailfin catfish Pterygoplichthys disjunctivus (Weber, 1991), A. tropicus, C. labrosus and A. probatocephalus (Kumar et al., 2007; Chakrabarti, Rathore, 2010; Uscanga-Martínez et al., 2011; Villalba-Villalba et al., 2011; Guerrero-Zárate et al., 2014; Pujante et al., 2016; Merino-Contreras et al., 2018). All these differences depend on each species’ feeding habits. For example, in the black carp Mylopharyngodon piceus (Richardson, 1846), the main alkaline proteases were trypsin and chymotrypsin, and eighth protease isoforms were detected, which have been related to its herbivorous feeding habit (Liu, Li, 2008).
In Vieja melanurus and V. bifasciata, results indicate that metalloproteases are essential digestive enzymes that intervene mainly in protein hydrolysis, releasing amino acids that are absorbed by the enterocytes and their role in the resolution of inflammatory processes (Chadzinska et al., 2008). So, serine proteases’ luminal digestive activity (trypsin and chymotrypsin) seems to be second but still relevant in the intestinal digestive process. Both species have similar digestive protease capacities, which is caused by they sharing the same habitat and even feeding habits (Pease et al., 2018), gives them the advantage of digesting the various foods that the environment provides, in addition to the possibility of adapting to the consumption of balanced foods that include, not only ingredients of animal origin, but plant origin. However, their inclusion must be carefully evaluated to ensure that these vegetable meals do not contain high antinutrient concentrations when incorporated into the formulation (Alarcón et al., 2001).
In conclusion, both species showed typical capacities of digestive enzymes observed for other neotropical freshwater species with high thermal and pH stability and high sensitivity to specific inhibitors. However, V. bifasciata has a higher resistance to the presence of inhibitors, so the development of a food based on different protein ingredients of animal or vegetable origin should be tested using in vitro and in vivo techniques. The digestive enzymes are of particular interest since the rate of digestion in the intestinal system limits the amount of nutrients that can be contributed to the bloodstream and, therefore, influences the entire organism’s growth due to the great importance of protein fraction in fish nutrition. The levels of secretion of this enzyme are related to food intake and stomach filling, so a period of fasting or poor feeding results in a decrease in activity. On the other hand, other alkaline proteases such as chymotrypsin may even be a better indicator of nutritional status in some species. Therefore, both species present thermostable enzymatic activities that could be taken as a reference to evaluate optimal protein ingredients for the development of specific diets for each species and minimize production costs in both species’ culture.
This research was funded through the research project FOMIX CONACYT – Government of the State of Tabasco “Identification of ingredients in balanced feed and its digestibility in the experimental culture of native fish in Tabasco” TAB–2005–C06–16260.
Alarcón FJ, Díaz M, Moyano FJ, Abell’n E. Characterization and functional properties of digestive proteases in two sparids; gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) and common dentex (Dentex dentex). Fish Physiol Biochem. 1998; 19(3):257–67. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007717708491
Alarcón FJ, García-Carreño FL, Toro MAN. Effect of plant protease inhibitors on digestive proteases in two fish species, Lutjanus argentiventris and L. novemfasciatus. Fish Physiol Biochem. 2001; 24(3):179–89. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014079919461
Álvarez-González CA, Cervantes-Trujano M, Tovar-Ramírez D, Conklin DE, Nolasco H, Gisbert, E, Piedrahita R. Development of digestive enzymes in California halibut Paralichthys californicus larvae. Fish Physiol Biochem. 2005; 31(1):83–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10695-006-0003-8
Anson ML. The estimation of pepsin, trypsin, papain and cathepsin with hemoglobin. J Gen Physiol. 1938; 22(1):79–89. https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.22.1.79
Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein dye-binding. Anal Biochem. 1976; 72(1–2):248–54. https://doi.org/10.1006/abio.1976.9999
Cahu C, Rønnestad I, Grangier V, Zambonino Infante JL. Expression and activities of pancreatic enzymes in developing sea bass larvae (Dicentrarchus labrax) in relation to intact and hydrolyzed dietary protein; involvement of cholecystokinin. Aquaculture. 2004; 238(1–4):295–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2004.04.013
Chadzinska M, Baginski P, Kolaczkowska E, Savelkoul HFJ, Verburg-van Kemenade BML. Expression profiles of matrix metalloproteinase 9 in teleost fish provide evidence for its active role in initiation and resolution of inflammation. Immunology. 2008;125(4):601–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2567.2008.02874.x
Chakrabarti R, Rathore RM. Ontogeny changes in the digestive enzyme patterns and characterization of proteases in Indian major carp Cirrhinus mrigala. Aquac Nutr. 2010;16(6):569–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2095.2009.00694.x
Chong ASC, Hashim R, Chow-Yang L, Ali AB. Partial characterization and activities of proteases from the digestive tract of discus fish (Symphysodon aequifasciata). Aquaculture. 2002; 203(3–4):321–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(01)00630-5
Comabella Y, Mendoza R, Aguilera C, Carrillo O, Hurtado A, García-Galano T. Digestive enzyme activity Turing early larval development of the Cuban gar Atractosteus tristoechus. Fish Physiol Biochem. 2006;32(2):147–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10695-006-0007-4
Concha-Frias B, Alvarez-González CA, Gaxiola-Cortés MG, Silva-Arancibia AE, Toledo-Agüero PH, Martínez-García R, Camarillo-Coop S, Arias-Moscoso JL. Partial Characterization of digestive proteases in the common snook Centropomus undecimalis. Int J Biol. 2016; 8(4):1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ijb.v8n4p1
Dávila-Camacho CA, Galaviz-Villa I, Lango-Reynoso F, Castañeda-Chávez MR, Quiroga-Brahms C, Montoya-Mendoza J. Cultivation of native fish in Mexico: Cases of success. Rev Aquacult. 2019; 11(3):816–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12259
Deguara S, Jauncey K, Agius C. Enzyme activities and pH variations in the digestive tract of gilthead sea bream. J Fish Biol. 2003; 62(5):1033–43. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1095-8649.2003.00094.x
Díaz-López M, Moyano FJ, Alarcón-López FJ, García-Carreño FL, Toro MAN. Characterization of fish acid proteases by substrate-gel electrophoresis. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol. 1998; 121(4):369–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0491(98)10123-2
Dunn BM. Determination of protease mechanism. In: Beynon RJ, Bond JS, editors. Proteolytic enzymes: A practical approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1989. p.57–81.
Eshel A, Lindner P, Smirnoff P, Newton S, Harpaz S. Comparative study of proteolytic enzymes in the digestive tracts of the European sea bass and hybrid striped bass reared in freshwater. Comp Biochem Physiol A Physiol. 1993;106(4):627–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-9629(93)90371-A
Furné M, Hidalgo MC, López A, García-Gallego M, Morales AE, Domezain A, Domezainé J, Sanz A. Digestive enzyme activities in Adriatic sturgeon Acipenser naccarii and rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss: A comparative study. Aquaculture. 2005; 250(1–2):391–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.05.017
Guerrero-Zárate R, Álvarez-González CA, Olvera-Novoa MA, Perales-García N, Frías-Quintana CA, Martínez-García R, Contreras-Sánchez WM. Partial characterization of digestive proteases in tropical gar Atractosteus tropicus juveniles. Fish Physiol Biochem. 2014;40(4):1021–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10695-013-9902-7
Hamza N, Mhetli M, Kestemont P. Effects of weaning age and diets on ontogeny of digestive activities and structures of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) larvae. Fish Physiol Biochem. 2007; 33(2):121–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10695-006-9123-4
Jónás E, Rágyanszki M, Oláh J, Boross L. Proteolytic digestive enzymes of carnivorous (Silurus glanis L.), herbivorous (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix val.) and omnivorous (Cyprinus Carpio L.) fishes. Aquaculture. 1983; 30(1–4):145–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(83)90158-8
Khaled HB, Jellouli K, Souissi N, Ghorbel S, Barkia A, Nasri M. Purification and characterization of three trypsin isoforms from viscera of sardinelle (Sardinella aurita). Fish Physiol Biochem. 2011; 37(1):123–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10695-010-9424-5
Kumar S, García-Carreño FL, Chakrabarti R, Toro MAN, Córdova-Murueta MJ. Digestive proteases of three carps Catla catla, Labeo rohita and Hypophthalmichthys molitrix: partial characterization and protein hydrolysis efficiency. Aquac Nutr. 2007; 13(5):381–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2095.2007.00488.x
Kunitz M. Crystalline soybean trypsin inhibitor: II. General properties. J Gen Physiol. 1947; 30(4):291–310. https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.30.4.291
Kurokawa T, Suzuki T, Hashimoto H. Identification of gastrin and multiple cholecystokinin genes in teleost. Peptides. 2003; 24(2):227–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0196-9781(03)00034-2
Liu ZY, Li ZH. Proteinases from the digestive organs of black carp (Mylopharyngodon piceus): Partial characterization and protein digestibility in vitro. J Life Sci. 2008; 2(5):18–28. Available from: http://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh?DocID=19347391-200805-2-5-18-28-a
López-Ramírez G, Cuenca-Soria CA, Alvarez-González CA, Tovar-Ramírez D, Ortiz-Galindo JL, Perales-García N, Márquez-Couturier G, Arias-Rodríguez L, Indy JR, Contreras-Sánchez WM, Gisbert E, Moyano FJ. Development of digestive enzymes in larvae of Mayan cichlid Cichlasoma urophthalmus. Fish Physiol Biochem. 2011; 37(1):197–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10695-010-9431-6
Martínez-Cárdenas L, Álvarez-González CA, Hernández-Almeida OU, Frías-Quintana CA, Ponce-Palafox JT, Castillo-Vargasmachuca S. Partial characterization of digestive proteases in the green cichlid, Cichlasoma beani. Fishes. 2017; 2(1):4. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes2010004
Martínez-Cárdenas L, Frías-Quintana CA, Álvarez-González CA, Jiménez-Martínez LD, Martínez-García R, Hernández-Almeida OU, Bello-Pineda J, Arellano-Méndez LU, Ponce-Palafox JT. Partial characterization of digestive proteases in juveniles of Microphis brachyurus (short-tailed pipefish) (Syngnathiformes: Syngnathidae). Neotrop Ichthyol. 2020; 18(2):e190085. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0224-2019-0085
Merino-Contreras ML, Sánchez-Morales F, Jiménez-Badillo ML, Peña-Marín ES, Álvarez-González CA. Partial characterization of digestive proteases in sheepshead, Archosargus probatocephalus (Spariformes: Sparidae). Neotrop Ichthyol. 2018; 16(4):e180020. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0224-20180020
Moyano FJ, Díaz M, Alarcón FJ, Sarasquete MC. Characterization of digestive enzyme activity during larval development of gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata). Fish Physiol Biochem. 1996; 15(2):121–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01875591
Natalia Y, Hashim R, Ali A, Chong A. Characterization of digestive enzymes in a carnivorous ornamental fish, the Asian bony tongue Scleropages formosus (Osteoglossidae). Aquaculture. 2004; 233(1–4):305–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2003.08.012
de la Parra AM, Rosas A, Lazo JP, Viana MT. Partial characterization of the digestive enzymes of Pacific bluefin tuna Thunnus orientalis under culture conditions. Fish Physiol Biochem. 2007; 33(3):223–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10695-007-9134-9
Pease AA, Mendoza-Carranza M, Winemiller KO. Feeding ecology and ecomorphology of cichlid assemblages in a large Mesoamerican river delta. Environ Biol Fishes. 2018; 101(6):867–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-018-0743-1
Pérez-Sánchez E, Páramo-Delgadillo S. The culture of cichlids of southeastern Mexico. Aquac Res. 2008; 39(7):777–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2008.01929.x
Pujante IM, Díaz-López M, Mancera JM, Moyano FJ. Characterization of digestive enzymes protease and alpha-amylase activities in the thick-lipped grey mullet (Chelon labrosus, Risso 1827). Aquac Res. 2016;48(2):367–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.13038
Rodrigáñez MS, Alarcón FJ, Martínez MI, Ruiz F, Díaz M, Moyano FJ. Caracterización de las proteasas digestivas del lenguado senegalés Solea senegalensis Kaup, 1858. Bol Inst Esp Oceanogr. 2005; 21(1–4):95–104. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=2358993
Solovyev MM, Kashinskaya EN, Izvekova GI, Glupov VV. pH Values and activity of digestive enzymes in the gastrointestinal tract of fish in lake Chany (West Siberia). J Ichthyol. 2015; 55(2):251–58. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0032945215010208
Stauffer CE. Enzyme assays for food scientists. New York: Van Nostand Reinhold; 1989.
Teles A, Salas-Leiva J, Alvarez-González CA, Tovar-Ramírez D. Changes in digestive enzyme activities during early ontogeny of Seriola rivoliana. Fish Physiol Biochem. 2019; 45(2):733–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10695-018-0598-6
Toledo-Solís FJ, Márquez-Couturier G, Uscanga-Martíınez A, Guerrero-Zárate R, Perales-García N, Martínez‐García R, Contreras‐Sánchez WM, Camarillo‐Coop S, Álvarez-González CA. Partial characterization of digestive proteases of the three-spot cichlid Cichlasoma trimaculatum (Günter, 1867). Aquac Nutr. 2015; 22(6):1230–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/anu.12329
Ueberschär B. Measurement of proteolytic enzyme activity: Significance and application in larval fish research. In: Walther BT, Fyhn HJ, editors. Physiological and biochemical aspects of fish development. Norway: University of Bergen; 1993. p.233–39.
Uscanga-Martínez A, Perales-García N, Álvarez-González CA, Moyano FJ, Tovar-Ramírez D, Gisbert E, Indy JR. Changes in digestive enzyme activity during initial ontogeny of bay snook Petenia splendida. Fish Physiol Biochem. 2011; 37:667–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10695-011-9467-2
Villalba-Villalba AG, Pacheco-Aguilar R, Ramírez-Suarez JC, Valenzuela-Soto EM, Castillo-Yáñez FJ, Márquez-Ríos E. Partial characterization of alkaline proteases from viscera of vermiculated sailfin catfish Pterygoplichthys disjunctivus Weber, 1991. Fish Sci. 2011; 77(4):697–705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12562-011-0372-5
Walter HE. Proteinases: Methods with hemoglobin, casein and azocoll as substrates. In: Bergmeyer HU, editor. Methods of enzymatic analysis – Volume V. Weinheim: Verlag Chemie; 1984. p.270–77.
Xiong DM, Xie CX, Zhang HJ, Liu HP. Digestive enzymes along digestive tract of a carnivorous fish Glyptosternum maculatum (Sisoridae, Siluriformes). J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 2011; 95(1):56–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0396.2009.00984.x
Carlos Alfonso Frías-Quintana , Emyr Saul Peña-Marín Carlos David Ramírez-Custodio Rafael Martínez-García Luis Daniel Jiménez-Martínez Susana Camarillo-Coop Rocío Guerrero-Zárate Gloria Gertrudys Asencio-Alcudia and Carlos Alfonso Álvarez-González
 Laboratorio de Investigación en Biotecnología Acuícola (LIBA), Tecnológico Nacional de México Campus Boca del Río (ITBoca). Carretera Veracruz-Córdoba km 12, 94290, Boca del Río, Veracruz, Mexico. (CAFQ) firstname.lastname@example.org.
 Laboratorio de Acuicultura Tropical, DACBIOL-Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco. Carretera Villahermosa-Cárdenas km 0.5, C.P. 86139, Villahermosa, Tabasco, Mexico. (ESPM) email@example.com; (CDRC) firstname.lastname@example.org; (RMG) email@example.com; (SCC) firstname.lastname@example.org; (RGZ) email@example.com; (GGAA) firstname.lastname@example.org; (CAAG) email@example.com (corresponding author)
 Cátedra CONACyT-UJAT. Av. Insurgentes Sur 1582, Col. Crédito Constructor, Alcaldía Benito Juárez, C.P. 03940, CDMX, Mexico.
 División Académica Multidisciplinaria de Jalpa de Méndez, Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco, Carretera Nacajuca-Jalpa de Méndez R/a Rivera Alta, C.P. 86200, Jalpa de Méndez, Tabasco, Mexico. (LDJM) firstname.lastname@example.org
Carlos Alfonso Frías-Quintana: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing-original draft, Writing-review and editing.
Emyr Saul Peña-Marín: Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Writing-original draft, Writing-review and editing.
Carlos David Ramírez-Custodio: Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Writing-original draft.
Rafael Martínez-García: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Supervision, Validation, Writing-original draft, Writing-review and editing.
Luis Daniel Jiménez-Martínez: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing-original draft, Writing-review and editing.
Susana Camarillo-Coop: Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Writing-original draft, Writing-review and editing.
Rocío Guerrero-Zárate: Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing-original draft, Writing-review and editing.
Gloria Gertrudys Asencio-Alcudia: Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing-original draft, Writing-review and editing.
Carlos Alfonso Álvarez-González: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing-original draft, Writing-review and editing.
Biological material is registered at the Colección de Peces de ECOSUR, Unidad San Cristóbal de Las Casas (ECOSC) number INE-SEMARNAP (CHI.PE.010.0497).
The authors declare no competing interests.
How to cite this article
Frías-Quintana CA, Peña-Marín ES, Ramírez-Custodio CD, Martínez-García R, Jiménez-Martínez LD, Camarillo-Coop S, Guerrero-Zárate R, Asencio-Alcudia GG, Álvarez-González CA. Comparative characterization of digestive proteases in redhead cichlid (Vieja melanurus) and twoband cichlid (Vieja bifasciata) (Percoidei: Cichlidae). Neotrop Ichthyol. 2021; 19(1):e200095. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0224-2020-0095
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0
© 2021 The Authors.
Diversity and Distributions Published by SBI
Submitted September 5, 2020
Accepted January 24, 2021
by Bernardo Baldisserotto
Epub March 15, 2021